2011/3/25 Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com:
unsafePerformIO traverses the stack to perform blackholing. It could
be that your code uses a deep stack and unsafePerformIO is repeatedly
traversing it. Just a guess, though.
Sounds reasonable. Here is a variant of the program without
ghc should not fail if HOME is not set. It certainly cannot look up
local packages then, but ghc should work without those, too.
ghc is a compiler like gcc. Does gcc need HOME?
Cheers Christian
Am 25.03.2011 08:26, schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi,
new FTBFS coming up: ghc fails if HOME is not
On 25/03/2011 08:56, Sebastian Fischer wrote:
2011/3/25 Thomas Schillingnomin...@googlemail.com:
unsafePerformIO traverses the stack to perform blackholing. It could
be that your code uses a deep stack and unsafePerformIO is repeatedly
traversing it. Just a guess, though.
Sounds reasonable.
On 25/03/2011 09:28, Christian Maeder wrote:
ghc should not fail if HOME is not set. It certainly cannot look up
local packages then, but ghc should work without those, too.
ghc is a compiler like gcc. Does gcc need HOME?
Does gcc have a package database? :-)
Of course, GHC should work
I don't think anyone has really looked at those SrcSpans before. I'm fixing...
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-
| users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of JP Moresmau
| Sent: 18 March 2011 13:52
| To:
