Here's the error. I've run make clean, but it didn't help:
"/usr/bin/ghc" -H64m -O -fasm -package-conf
libraries/bootstrapping.conf -package-name Cabal-1.11.0
-hide-all-packages -i -ilibraries/Cabal/.
-ilibraries/Cabal/dist-boot/build
-ilibraries/Cabal/dist-boot/build/autogen
-Ilibraries/Cabal
Excellent, those suggestions are along the lines I was thinking.
Thanks for the pointer (no pun intended) re. the C functions in the
RTS; I hadn't known of those.
Will
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Sounds interesting, though I know nothing about LLDB. It would be nice t
On Thursday 21 April 2011 13:08:22, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 20/04/2011 18:28, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:02:50PM +0200, Daniel Fischer wrote:
> >> So, is it possible that some change in ghc-7.0.3 vs. the previous
> >> versions
> >
> > Very little changed between 7.0.2 and 7.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Fischer
wrote:
> On Thursday 21 April 2011 17:18:47, Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
>> I tried "ghc --make -fforce-recomp simpleTest.hs" with -O0 and -O1 and
>> -O2 on OS X with 64-bit ghc-7.0.3
>>
>> All versions ran without printing errors.
>
> I seem to recall t
On Thursday 21 April 2011 17:18:47, Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
> I tried "ghc --make -fforce-recomp simpleTest.hs" with -O0 and -O1 and
> -O2 on OS X with 64-bit ghc-7.0.3
>
> All versions ran without printing errors.
I seem to recall that GHC produces sse2 code on x86_64. If that's correct,
the eff
I tried "ghc --make -fforce-recomp simpleTest.hs" with -O0 and -O1 and -O2 on OS
X with 64-bit ghc-7.0.3
All versions ran without printing errors.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/li
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Right, it could be related to this. However this change was made to
> eliminate some causes of NaNs, see:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4914
>
> So I'm very depressed if it managed to introduce NaNs somehow.
>
> Could someone
On 20/04/2011 18:28, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:02:50PM +0200, Daniel Fischer wrote:
So, is it possible that some change in ghc-7.0.3 vs. the previous versions
Very little changed between 7.0.2 and 7.0.3. The only thing that jumps
out to me as possibly being relevant is:
di
