Yes, the plan was to eventually have a parallel --make mode.
If that's the goal, wouldn't it be easier to start many ghcs?
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Hi Pedro,
If it seems like this avoids the problem, I'd be happy to release a
new version of SYB containing these type-guided traversals.
Do you think it would be a good idea to make the interfaces of
Data.Generics.GPS and Data.Generics more similar? One thing I have
noted is, that
On 1 September 2011 08:44, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, the plan was to eventually have a parallel --make mode.
If that's the goal, wouldn't it be easier to start many ghcs?
Yes. With Scion I'm in the process of moving away from using GHC's
compilation manager (i.e., --make)
On 01/09/2011 08:44, Evan Laforge wrote:
Yes, the plan was to eventually have a parallel --make mode.
If that's the goal, wouldn't it be easier to start many ghcs?
It's an interesting idea that I hadn't thought of. There would have to
be an atomic file system operation to commit a compiled
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/09/2011 08:44, Evan Laforge wrote:
Yes, the plan was to eventually have a parallel --make mode.
If that's the goal, wouldn't it be easier to start many ghcs?
It's an interesting idea that I hadn't thought of.
It's an interesting idea that I hadn't thought of. There would have to be
an atomic file system operation to commit a compiled module - getting that
right could be a bit tricky (compilation isn't deterministic, so the commit
has to be atomic).
I suppose you could just rename it into place
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Jens Petersen
j...@community.haskell.orgwrote:
Since the test rpms are now gone from Koji and I don't think
I will start building 7.2 properly for Fedora until after ICFP
Just in case you didn't know, 7.4 is due to come out around the time of
ICFP. If you
