Re: OS X - Haskell to Objective-C Binding on GHC 6.6

2006-10-26 Thread Mathew Mills
, Would you be willing to send me a cvs diff as well? Thanks, -Rod On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:08 PM, Mathew Mills wrote: I just succeeded in building HOC from CVS HEAD against ghc-6.6 on x86 Mac OS X last night. I didn't encounter that specific problem, though. I can send you a cvs diff if

Re: OS X - Haskell to Objective-C Binding on GHC 6.6

2006-10-26 Thread Mathew Mills
I just succeeded in building HOC from CVS HEAD against ghc-6.6 on x86 Mac OS X last night. I didn't encounter that specific problem, though. I can send you a cvs diff if that would help. On Oct 26, 2006, at 10:15 AM, Charlie Conklin wrote: Is anyone out there running OS X and using HOC and

getting the -B topdir for a GHC-API app

2006-10-22 Thread Mathew Mills
What is the "right" way to get the topDir for use with the GHC API. I have a little app that I would like to cabalize and release, but I am not sure what is the approved way of getting the '-B' option set-up. I think it would be great if I could use template-haskell to insert the topDir fr

Re: Link errors when using the GHC API

2006-10-11 Thread Mathew Mills
Interesting. I was unable to reproduce your problem. What platform are you running on? Are you using a binary distribution or one you built from source? Seems like something didn't build right... You might use 'nm' to examine your libHSCabal.a to see if a similarly named symbol is pr

Re: Using GHC-as-a-library

2006-10-05 Thread Mathew Mills
check out main/SysTools.lhs. Looks like it uses some heuristic to decide whether GHC is "installed" or not. I suspect your test app is running from a location it considers to be part of the build-tree. Look at initSysTools and findTopDir. On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Martin Grabmueller wr

Re: GHC on MacOS

2006-10-02 Thread Mathew Mills
I won't have an Intel mac for another 30 days or so. I intend to do whatever it takes to get a working ghc 6.6 on that platform. Is no one working on this port? It seems to me that this should be a very simple port ( as simple as GHC ports get... ). I am surprised it isn't done yet. On