On 2012-01-16 19:16, Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Allow nested modules. [...]
Perhaps Agda's module/record system can provide some inspiration:
http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/pmwiki.php?n=ReferenceManual.Modules
http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/pmwiki.php?n=ReferenceManual.Records
(I
On 2011-01-10 16:39, Daniel Peebles wrote:
(especially if it lived on github)
Even if GitHub is used you should probably arrange some other kind of
backup solution, because GitHub reserves the right to delete your
repository for any reason at any time (http://help.github.com/terms/).
--
/NAD
On 2010-04-12 22:28, Bradford Larsen wrote:
2. If I cannot install multiple ghc versions from a different apt
repository, does anyone have advice for how to work with multiple
simultaneous installations? A how-to guide or anything like that?
I install GHC under /usr/local/stow/ghc-version/
On 2010-04-13 15:08, Dave Bayer wrote:
Why not just use symbolic links?
When using stow I am just using symbolic links (and directories), except
that I don't need to create them all manually, and I can remove all of
them with a single command. I don't need to modify my PATH.
I only believe
On 2009-10-13 08:58, Ian Lynagh wrote:
If you're installing one of the Linux bindists then you can use
./configure --prefix=/your/path
and again you will have to set up the aliases yourself.
And if installing from source you can likewise use
./configure --prefix=/your/path
and set up
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
What about putting this thing on the Haskell Wiki?
Feel free to do so. I recently noted that some version of GHC (6.3?)
ships with a runghc program, so this problem will most likely disappear
soon, though.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
I want to use ghc as a script interpreter, using the '-e' option. The
problem is that I can't give the script any command line arguments,
because 'ghc -e' intepretes everything argument as the name of a module
to compile.
I once wrote a script
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Peter Simons wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this on his system?
getUserEntryForName [] = print . userName
wasabi
On Solaris I get the following results (GHC 6.2.2, GHC 6.2.1 exits with
Illegal Instruction):
Prelude System.Posix.User getUserEntryForName undefined user
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
Consider the compilation flag -allow-extension-for-bottom
which changes the language meaning so that allows to ignore
the bottom value. For example, the programs
(1) (\ x - (if p x then foo (g x) else foo (h x)) )
and
(2) (\ x
