ts as showstopper, though.
Cheers, Kyra
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
of indirection a that delicate stage.
Maybe some gcc mimicing cl wrapper tailored specifically for GHC
building system could help? One more layer of indirection, but could
leave ghc driver relatively intact.
Cheers,
Kyra
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mail
in Foreign.COM
namespace.
I'm very interested in such a library. I've also developed my own com
(client) library, but as for now it is too raw to be published.
Cheers,
Kyra
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.o
Simon Marlow wrote:
To fix this properly we should have a C++ compiler phase in
DriverPipeline, it wouldn't be too hard. Care to submit a bug report
with this info?
Submitted.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
h
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 17:54 +0300, kyra wrote:
With GHC 6.4.x I was able to use a ghc driver to compile .cpp sources.
Now, with GHC HEAD I cannot. GHC HEAD now ALWAYS enforces "treat as .c"
option.
Just wondering, you're using ghc to compile C++ so
s completely breaks my build infrastructure. Could it be reversed?
Cheers,
Kyra
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
i prefer to see the asm code. this may be because of better high-level
optimization strategies (reusing fib values). the scheme about i say
will combine advantages of both worlds
no strategies, plain exponential algorithm,
ocaml:
_camlFibo__fib_57:
subesp, 8
L101
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
i think that ocaml can't generate code better than gcc and especially
icc (intel C/C++ compiler), but may be i'm wrong? ;)
didn't try factorial, but exponential fib in ocaml is *FASTER* than both
gcc and intel c/c++ with highest optimization levels
.o"
...
Meanwhile, ghc-6.3 correctly outputs intermediate .c or .s (when compiling
without gcc) files.
I'm completely stuck.
Regards,
Kyra
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Hi, folks!
Trying to build either 6.2 or 6.3 ghc with mingw ghc 6.0.1 and gcc 3.3.1, I
get multiple
"undefined reference to `__module_registered' " errors during a stage2 ghc
linking.
Is the gcc 3.3 behaviour the case?
Regards,
Kyra
10 matches
Mail list logo