Wolfgang Thaller wrote:
Could someone on MacOS X try the 6.4.x branch again? I just
committed a fix that makes the threaded RTS more stable on Solaris,
and I'm hoping it clears up the problems on MacOS X too. Remember to
re-enable -threaded in ghc/compiler/Makefile if you previously
disa
Could someone on MacOS X try the 6.4.x branch again? I just
committed a fix that makes the threaded RTS more stable on Solaris,
and I'm hoping it clears up the problems on MacOS X too. Remember
to re-enable -threaded in ghc/compiler/Makefile if you previously
disabled it.
The problem se
Could someone on MacOS X try the 6.4.x branch again? I just committed a fix
that makes the threaded RTS more stable on Solaris, and I'm hoping it clears up
the problems on MacOS X too. Remember to re-enable -threaded in
ghc/compiler/Makefile if you previously disabled it.
If this does indeed
David Kirkman wrote:
I ran the testsuite against the current HEAD (as of saturday afternoon)
and had far fewer failures. Is the last week's work supposed to have
fixed so many test cases? Or are different machines giving different
results? The tests that resulted in unexpected failures for gre
I'll run the latest on my G4 tonight and we can see.
Best Wishes,
Greg
On Aug 28, 2006, at 12:05 AM, David Kirkman wrote:
I ran the testsuite against the current HEAD (as of saturday
afternoon)
and had far fewer failures. Is the last week's work supposed to have
fixed so many test cases?
I ran the testsuite against the current HEAD (as of saturday afternoon)
and had far fewer failures. Is the last week's work supposed to have
fixed so many test cases? Or are different machines giving different
results? The tests that resulted in unexpected failures for greg were
all run on my m
Gregory Wright wrote:
Here's what happened (this is after I applied David Kirkman's SMP.h
patch to my tree).
When I said 132 failures I was speaking from memory. The actual number
was 136,
as noted in the log:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Mon Aug 14 11:20:03 EDT 2006
1412 t
Hi Simon,
On Aug 24, 2006, at 7:34 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Gregory Wright wrote:
I built HEAD and ran ghc-regress last week. It looks like the
compiler crashes are almost
all gone. There are still 132 unexpected failures, but only one
compiler crash.
Are these crashes all for the thr
Hi Simon,
On Aug 24, 2006, at 7:34 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Gregory Wright wrote:
I built HEAD and ran ghc-regress last week. It looks like the
compiler crashes are almost
all gone. There are still 132 unexpected failures, but only one
compiler crash.
Are these crashes all for the th
Gregory Wright wrote:
I built HEAD and ran ghc-regress last week. It looks like the compiler
crashes are almost
all gone. There are still 132 unexpected failures, but only one
compiler crash.
Are these crashes all for the threaded2 way? We'll probably need to disable SMP
on PPC for th
Hi Simon,
On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:56 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hi Folks,
Roman Leshchinskiy and I looked into the 6.4.3 crashes on Sparc/
Solaris yesterday. I think we may have found the problem, and it
seems likely that this is the same problem affecting 6.4.3 on MacOS
X. The threaded RTS
"Worse is Better" gives an entertaining view on this fact.
pepe
On 24/08/06, skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 08:56 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Roman Leshchinskiy and I looked into the 6.4.3 crashes on Sparc/Solaris
> yesterday. I think we may have found
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 08:56 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Roman Leshchinskiy and I looked into the 6.4.3 crashes on Sparc/Solaris
> yesterday. I think we may have found the problem, and it seems likely that
> this
> is the same problem affecting 6.4.3 on MacOS X. The threaded RTS
Hi Folks,
Roman Leshchinskiy and I looked into the 6.4.3 crashes on Sparc/Solaris
yesterday. I think we may have found the problem, and it seems likely that this
is the same problem affecting 6.4.3 on MacOS X. The threaded RTS is assuming in
a couple of places that pthread_cond_wait() doesn'
14 matches
Mail list logo
