I would like to explore making a backend for .NET. I've done a lot of
background reading about previous .NET and JVM attempts for Haskell. It
seems like several folks have made significant progress in the past and,
with the exception of UHC, I can't find any code around the internet from
the previo
> The trac claims that ghc can compile itself to C so that only standard gnu C
> tools are needed to build an unregistered compiler.
Wait, it can? Where's that?
On 28 January 2013 02:15, Jason Dagit wrote:
> I would like to explore making a backend for .NET. I've done a lot of
> background read
I believe that some Microsoft Research folks at Cambridge got a fairly
far along implementation of Haskell on Java or .NET many years back
but concluded it wasn't a good fit. My rusty memory of a conversation
with Simon Marlow about this was that all the Java libraries basically
ended up in IO and
o:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Jason Dagit
Sent: 28 January 2013 01:16
To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: How to get started with a new backend?
I would like to explore making a backend for .NET. I've done a lot of
background reading about previous .NET
On 01/28/13 02:15 AM, Jason Dagit wrote:
I would like to explore making a backend for .NET. I've done a lot of
background reading about previous .NET and JVM attempts for Haskell. It
seems like several folks have made significant progress in the past and,
with the exception of UHC, I can't find a
On 28/01/13 11:21, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
I would like to explore making a backend for .NET. I've done a lot of
background reading about previous .NET and JVM attempts for Haskell. It
seems like several folks have made significant progress in the past and,
with the exception of UHC, I can't fi
On 28/01/13 01:15, Jason Dagit wrote:
I would like to explore making a backend for .NET. I've done a lot of
background reading about previous .NET and JVM attempts for Haskell. It
seems like several folks have made significant progress in the past and,
with the exception of UHC, I can't find any
On 28/01/13 06:35, Christopher Done wrote:
The trac claims that ghc can compile itself to C so that only standard gnu C
tools are needed to build an unregistered compiler.
Wait, it can? Where's that?
It used to be able to. Nowadays we cross-compile.
Cheers,
Simon
On 28 January
On Jan 27, 2013, at 10:35 PM, Christopher Done wrote:
>> The trac claims that ghc can compile itself to C so that only standard gnu C
>> tools are needed to build an unregistered compiler.
>
> Wait, it can? Where's that?
Look at unregistered builds. For example:
http://hackage.haskell.org/t
On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:21 PM, David Terei wrote:
> I believe that some Microsoft Research folks at Cambridge got a fairly
> far along implementation of Haskell on Java or .NET many years back
> but concluded it wasn't a good fit. My rusty memory of a conversation
> with Simon Marlow about this
On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:21 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> I would like to explore making a backend for .NET. I've done a lot of
> background reading about previous .NET and JVM attempts for Haskell. It seems
> like several folks have made significant progress in the past and, with the
> excep
On Jan 28, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 28/01/13 01:15, Jason Dagit wrote:
>> I would like to explore making a backend for .NET. I've done a lot of
>> background reading about previous .NET and JVM attempts for Haskell. It
>> seems like several folks have made significant progress
Someone wrote a Haskell library that could interoperate with .NET -
you might get ideas for how to express .NET's type system in Haskell
from it:
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Salsa
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Jason Dagit wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:21 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
