Joel Reymont wrote:
On Jul 11, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Which ones hang? Could you take one of the hanging tests, compile it
with -debug, run with +RTS -Ds, and send us the output?
What ends up happening is this:
28683 p2 S 0:00.11 ../../timeout/timeout 300 cd ./typec
On Jul 11, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Which ones hang? Could you take one of the hanging tests, compile
it with -debug, run with +RTS -Ds, and send us the output?
What ends up happening is this:
28683 p2 S 0:00.11 ../../timeout/timeout 300 cd ./typecheck/
should_compile &
Joel Reymont wrote:
It's a little bit more complicated for me since some tests just plain
hang. I will investigate, though.
Which ones hang? Could you take one of the hanging tests, compile it with
-debug, run with +RTS -Ds, and send us the output?
Cheers,
Simon
___
It's a little bit more complicated for me since some tests just plain
hang. I will investigate, though.
On Jul 11, 2006, at 2:56 AM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Not too bad (mips64 is around the same), but not the same as the
linux head:
[...]
So the next step would be to diff the two resul
joelr1:
> This is using stage2. Does it look any better?
>
> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Mon Jul 10 15:11:22 BST 2006
> 952 total tests, which gave rise to
> 4583 test cases, of which
> 11 caused framework failures
> 1099 were skipped
>
> 3185 expected passes
>
This is using stage2. Does it look any better?
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Mon Jul 10 15:11:22 BST 2006
952 total tests, which gave rise to
4583 test cases, of which
11 caused framework failures
1099 were skipped
3185 expected passes
24 expected failures
Joel Reymont wrote:
On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Using the wrong stage for the test? You'll need to use the stage2 ghc.
make stage=2 does it but I wish this was documented.
wish granted :-)
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-
On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Using the wrong stage for the test? You'll need to use the stage2 ghc.
make stage=2 does it but I wish this was documented.
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing lis
On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Using the wrong stage for the test? You'll need to use the stage2 ghc.
How do I do this?
I just ran make in the tests directory and it indeed picked up stage1
ghc.
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
___
dons:
> joelr1:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.7 on Intel. This is the result of running
> > the ghc-regress suite of tests using a freshly updated ghc 6.5 that
> > was bootstrapped using a binary distribution.
> >
> > I suspect the framework failures were cases where tests got
joelr1:
> Folks,
>
> I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.7 on Intel. This is the result of running
> the ghc-regress suite of tests using a freshly updated ghc 6.5 that
> was bootstrapped using a binary distribution.
>
> I suspect the framework failures were cases where tests got hung and
> I had to
Folks,
I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.7 on Intel. This is the result of running
the ghc-regress suite of tests using a freshly updated ghc 6.5 that
was bootstrapped using a binary distribution.
I suspect the framework failures were cases where tests got hung and
I had to Ctrl-C them to let tes
12 matches
Mail list logo
