Re: Maps, was Re: GHC source code improvement ideas

2008-01-09 Thread Adrian Hey
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Am Sonntag, 6. Januar 2008 13:37 schrieb Adrian Hey: It's the GT class here.. Short remark: Wouldn’t a longer, more descriptive identifier be better? Like GeeTee maybe? or even GeneralisedTrie? I like short names myself. But as I have stopped work on this particular

Re: Maps, was Re: GHC source code improvement ideas

2008-01-08 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Sonntag, 6. Januar 2008 13:37 schrieb Adrian Hey: It's the GT class here.. Short remark: Wouldn’t a longer, more descriptive identifier be better? Best wishes, Wolfgang ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: Maps, was Re: GHC source code improvement ideas

2008-01-06 Thread Adrian Hey
Christian Maeder wrote: Simon Marlow wrote: Regarding Data.Map, I'd be interested in trying out AVL trees instead, to see if they have better performance, but then we'd have to import the code of course. Surely, we want the best maps possible for ghc and as public library (and minimize

Maps, was Re: GHC source code improvement ideas

2008-01-04 Thread Christian Maeder
Simon Marlow wrote: Regarding Data.Map, I'd be interested in trying out AVL trees instead, to see if they have better performance, but then we'd have to import the code of course. Surely, we want the best maps possible for ghc and as public library (and minimize maintenance). The problem is