Simon Marlow wrote: > Regarding Data.Map, I'd be interested in trying out AVL trees instead, > to see if they have better performance, but then we'd have to import the > code of course.
Surely, we want the best maps possible for ghc and as public library (and minimize maintenance). The problem is to agree on a suitable interface. I would suggest to take (or only slightly change) Daan's interface (the current Data.Map) and improve the underlying implementation possibly using (i.e. Adrian Hey's) AVL trees. Christian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
