Sven writes:
P.S.: Something completely unrelated: Why is majordomo.haskell.org
expanded to scarlet.cam.uk.eu.microsoft.com in the To:-field?
IMHO this is a bad idea, e.g. when people cut-and-paste this
into their address books and scarlet is renamed to
e.g.
Sven writes:
P.S.: Something completely unrelated: Why is majordomo.haskell.org
expanded to scarlet.cam.uk.eu.microsoft.com in the To:-field?
IMHO this is a bad idea, e.g. when people cut-and-paste this
into their address books and scarlet is renamed to e.g. rhett. :-)
Panne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 10:09 AM
To: GHC Users
Subject: Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS
"Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)" wrote:
[...]Good point, I've committed a fix for this.
Adjustor.c gets more and more impressive. :-) BTW: What is the
Sven Panne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Aaaah! *lights going on* But then I suggest that foreign export
dynamic should be changed to return a stable pointer instead
of an Addr. This shouldn't break too much code, because both
are CCallable.
I don't see the need, since (deep
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Yes, we do this a lot. It's such a useful thing that I wonder
whether we should support it more directly, somehow.
That eases my mind. :-) I feared that I'm the only one doing this
kind of hackery...
As it stands, its vulnerable to 'blockingSem' getting inlined
"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" wrote:
[...]
The required synchronization could of course be programmed
using `Concurrent's semaphores, but with the disadvantage
that if we want to provide this thread-safety transparently
for user applications in a library, we have to define a
"new" IO monad on
