They're already tagged with [
ghc-Feature . ]. Is that ok?
Cheers,
Simon
From: Seth Kurtzberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 January 2005 23:45To: Simon MarlowCc:
Ketil Malde; glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.orgSubject: Re: [
ghc-Feature Requests-1104381 ] Add wxHa
I would prefer to keep them on the list. There are already a number of
different lists, and (of course IMO) I can't see a need to read _only_
feature requests, so why separate them?
Adding a tag to the email that would let maildrop or procmail deliver
it to a different folder would be a nice
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's intentional, but it can be easily turned off. Do people want to
> see feature-requests, task-list entries and so forth on this mailing
> list, or should they be confined to, say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would vote to put them in a separate list. At
On 18 January 2005 14:42, Ketil Malde wrote:
> I seem to be getting messages from Sourceforge from this mailing
> list. Is that an intended use for ghc-users?
It's intentional, but it can be easily turned off. Do people want to
see feature-requests, task-list entries and so forth on this mailin
On 18 January 2005 14:52, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> While we're thinking about it, could a link to Gtk2Hs be added:
> http://gtk2hs.sourceforge.net/ . Our web page has been updated to be
> rather more current.
Done.
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 06:09 -0800, SourceForge.net wrote:
> Initial Comment:
> Hi, I am a user of wxHaskell, a wxWidgets binding for
> haskell.
>
> The product is very useful to me.
> Adding it to the homepage will ensure that more
> contribution is added to it though.
> Haskell community has t
I seem to be getting messages from Sourceforge from this mailing
list. Is that an intended use for ghc-users?
-kzm
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-user
