Wow, lots of great information. We'll take a look at the papers and get back if
there's any remaining confusion. Thanks!
Chad
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskel
| I think we're all rather excited about seeing this stuff land.
| What's the expected timeline, wrt. ghc 6.10's release?
Good question. I've updated the overview here
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Compiler/NewCodeGen
to say what we plan.
Simon
___
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Deborah Goldsmith:
Has there been any thought about working with the LLVM project? I
didn't find anything on the wiki along those lines.
I have only had a rather brief look at LLVM, but my understanding at the
moment is that LLVM would not be able to support one
| > Has there been any thought about working with the LLVM project? I
| > didn't find anything on the wiki along those lines.
|
| I have only had a rather brief look at LLVM, but my understanding at
| the moment is that LLVM would not be able to support one of GHC's
| current code layout optimisati
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:25 +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> However, I am not convinced that this layout optimisation is really
> gaining that much extra performance these days. In particular, since
> dynamic pointer tagging, very short running "evals" (for which the
> extra indirect
on-Jones
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:32 PM
To: Norman Ramsey; John Dias
Cc: Chad Scherrer; GHC Users
Subject: RE: "dataflow rewriting engine"
Norman, John
Would you care to respond to this? (Perhaps by amplifying the wiki
page?) A good starting point is perhaps Craig's paper.
Excerpts from Deborah Goldsmith's message of Tue Aug 26 14:26:33 -0500 2008:
> Has there been any thought about working with the LLVM project? I
> didn't find anything on the wiki along those lines.
I imagine if tried, haskell as a language on LLVM would quickly end up
a second-class citizen, du
Cc: Chad Scherrer; GHC Users
Subject: RE: "dataflow rewriting engine"
Norman, John
Would you care to respond to this? (Perhaps by amplifying the wiki
page?) A good starting point is perhaps Craig's paper.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:glasgow-
[E
;
> Let me know how I can further clarify the text,
> -j
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simon Peyton-Jones
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:32 PM
> > To: Norman Ramsey; John Dias
> > Cc: Chad Scherrer; GHC Users
> > Subject: RE: "
amsey and Dias
2005 http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/pubs/zipcfg-abstract.html).
Let me know how I can further clarify the text,
-j
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Peyton-Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:32 PM
> To: Norman Ramsey; John Dias
> Cc: Chad Scherrer; GHC Users
Norman, John
Would you care to respond to this? (Perhaps by amplifying the wiki page?) A
good starting point is perhaps Craig's paper.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
| Behalf Of Chad Scherrer
| Sent: 22 August 2008 22:21
| To: GHC User
11 matches
Mail list logo
