On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Sven Panne wrote:
> Sven Panne wrote:
> > [...] This has been fixed for 4.07, but as people are supposed to be
> > able to build 4.07 with pre-4.07 compilers, I'll change those
> > identifiers in the driver sources with something more defensive.
>
> I've just realised that t
Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven Panne wrote:
> > [...] This has been fixed for 4.07, but as people are supposed to be
> > able to build 4.07 with pre-4.07 compilers, I'll change those
> > identifiers in the driver sources with something more defensive.
>
> I've ju
I think it's a legitimate problem with the new driver. I hit it myself
on Friday. I think that the _Capitalised entity naming scheme is
being misinterpreted by pre-4.07 ghc's.
... and I see that Sven has already fixed it. Cool.
J
Sven Panne wrote:
> [...] This has been fixed for 4.07, but as people are supposed to be
> able to build 4.07 with pre-4.07 compilers, I'll change those
> identifiers in the driver sources with something more defensive.
I've just realised that this is not the true story. You *can* build
4.07 with
Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> For some time I haven't been able to compile ghc from cvs. [...]
> What's going wrong? [...]
> Config.hs:2: Data constructor not in scope: `_ProjectName' [...]
Until recently (including 4.06) GHC confused variables having names
starting with an underscore followed by
For some time I haven't been able to compile ghc from cvs. Presumably
it is due to some local artefact in my cvs copy, but as a ghc learner
I don't really know where to start looking.
On my Linux Redhat 6.2 box, I have ghc-current, and am compiling with:
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 1999031
