Re: [GLLUG] KVM Performance

2020-06-09 Thread Mike Brodbelt via GLLUG
On 09/06/2020 22:52, Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote: Indeed. So wouldn't passing a block device from the host through to the guest minimise the 'components' that are 'in the way' I can' t help thinking that there must be something more behind a drop from 60MB/s to 15MB/s in write performance

Re: [GLLUG] KVM Performance

2020-06-09 Thread Ken Smith via GLLUG
Martin A. Brooks via GLLUG wrote: The more levels of indirection you have between any 2 components in a system the slower stuff will move. Indeed. So wouldn't passing a block device from the host through to the guest minimise the 'components' that are 'in the way' I can' t help thinking

Re: [GLLUG] KVM Performance

2020-06-09 Thread Martin A. Brooks via GLLUG
On 2020-06-09 21:51, Ken Smith via GLLUG wrote: What to conclude? Is the hardware just not fast enough? Are newer processors better at abstracting the VM guests with less performance impact? What am I missing?? The more levels of indirection you have between any 2 components in a system the

[GLLUG] KVM Performance

2020-06-09 Thread Ken Smith via GLLUG
Hi All, While in lockdown I decided to do some performance testing on KVM. I had believed that passing a block device through to a guest rather than using a QCOW2 file would get better performance. I wanted to see whether that was true and indeed whether using iSCSI storage was any