Re: [Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Testing

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:34:28PM -0400, Shyam wrote: > On 08/29/2016 08:25 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > > > I've had chats with Manoj and A

Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious failures for ./tests/basic/afr/root-squash-self-heal.t

>From glusterd log: [2016-08-31 07:54:24.817811] E [run.c:191:runner_log] (-->/build/install/lib/glusterfs/3.9dev/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xe1c30) [0x7f1a34ebac30] -->/build/install/lib/glusterfs/3.9dev/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xe1794) [0x7f1a34eba794] -->/build/install/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(

[Gluster-devel] spurious failures for ./tests/basic/afr/root-squash-self-heal.t

Hi, $subject is failing spuriously for one of my patch. One of the test case is: EXPECT_WITHIN $PROCESS_UP_TIMEOUT "1" afr_child_up_status $V0 0 ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-de

Re: [Gluster-devel] Running strfmt as smoke test

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:40:48PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello, > > Kaleb has pointed out that the number of failures here are creeping up. > I've suggested we run this as a smoke test. It's going to fail all the time > at first, so I propose it be a non-voting test for now. Once we get master

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS 3.7.15 released

GlusterFS 3.7.15 has been released. This is a regular scheduled release for GlusterFS-3.7 and includes 26 bug fixes since 3.7.14. The release-notes can be read at [1]. ## Downloads The tarball can be downloaded from [2]. ### Packages Binary packages have been built are in the process of being m

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] NetBSD aborted runs

I am seeing a pause when the .t runs that seem to last close to how much ever time we put in EXPECT_WITHIN [2016-09-01 03:24:21.852744] I [common.c:1134:pl_does_monkey_want_stuck_lock] 0-patchy-locks: stuck lock [2016-09-01 03:24:21.852775] W [inodelk.c:659:pl_inode_setlk] 0-patchy-locks: MONKEY L

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On 2016-08-26 at 21:38 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi, > Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), > want to get a sense if any of the status of the features. > > Please respond with: > 1) Feature already merged > 2) Undergoing review will make it by 31st

[Gluster-devel] Status of block and object storage on gluster(integration with containers as well)

hi, I will be sending status of this work every week. This is first mail of this work. We are enhancing these interfaces primarily for container storage - From gluster a container will be able to export a file as virtual block and will be used as private storage for that container, an

Re: [Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Hi, I would like to propose a lightning talk/ignite session. Running distaf/glusto tests in CentOS CI environment. I would like like to talk about the plans to make distaf/glusto run on CentOS CI, current status and the work pending there. If I could send pending patches before the summit, I wou

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

Created following etherpad to track the patches which needs to be merged before branching 3.9 https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/glusterfs-3.9-branch-blockers Please Note: - Patch should have Ack from Maintainer - Ready to merge patches but pending regressions. regards Aravinda On Friday 26 August

[Gluster-devel] Multiplexing status, August 31

(This is as much for my own reference as anything, but there seems to be a decent chance that others might be interested) The good news is that almost all of the tests in tests/basic, except for those related to problematic features (see below) pass now. Two of the AFR tests fail sporadically

[Gluster-devel] adding smoke test to catch printf-style format string errors

Hi, FYI, we are adding a new smoke test that builds on a 32-bit platform to catch printf-style format string errors. We have cleaned up these errors in the past, but they're creeping in again in new code and fixes. The test will start out as a non-voting test. After we get the source cleaned up

Re: [Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

I have one more talk to propose: Deterministic Releases and How to Get There Our release process needs to less about communication and more about "Are we confident this release is good". The path to get there is long and involves a lot of work. I'd like to talk about my rough ideas, get feedback,

[Gluster-devel] Running strfmt as smoke test

Hello, Kaleb has pointed out that the number of failures here are creeping up. I've suggested we run this as a smoke test. It's going to fail all the time at first, so I propose it be a non-voting test for now. Once we get master in a good shape, we can turn on voting for this job. Does that soun

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

I've given the flags. The change can be merged now. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Aravinda wrote: > +1 > > regards > Aravinda > > On Wednesday 31 August 2016 04:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Hi All, > > We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able > to debug

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Hi All, > > We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able > to debug the issue yet. > It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines > or that there is a bug in the brick code. > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Avoid merge conflicts for per component eventing changes

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> Is it a good idea to consolidate all of the events declaration (the >> identified ones) in one patch and then respective patches take care of >> implementing them to avoid t

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

+1 regards Aravinda On Wednesday 31 August 2016 04:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: Hi All, We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able to debug the issue yet. It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines or that there is a bug in th

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

On 08/31/2016 12:42 PM, Paul Cuzner wrote: Sounds great! I had to knit together different cli commands in the past for 'gstatus' to provide a view of the cluster - so this is a cool. Hi Paul, Glad you found it interesting. I had checked gstatus a few months back and yeah, I had noticed th

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Hi All, > > We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able > to debug the issue yet. > It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines > or that there is a bug in the brick code. > >

[Gluster-devel] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

Hi All, We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able to debug the issue yet. It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines or that there is a bug in the brick code. However, as we have 3.9 merge deadline tomorrow this is causing the test p

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Hi, I 'd like to talk about: Title : Gluster and Bareos Integration - Opensource Backup solution Theme : Experience - Description of real world experience and feedback from: b> Developers integrating Gluster with other ecosystems Agenda Planned: - Bareos Intr

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Sounds great! I had to knit together different cli commands in the past for 'gstatus' to provide a view of the cluster - so this is a cool. Would it be possible to add an example of the output to the RFE BZ* 1353156 * *?* Paul C On Wed, Aug