[Gluster-devel] gluster-block v0.5.1 is alive!

Hello Gluster folks, The gluster-block team is happy to announce the v0.5.1 release [1]. This is the security and bug fix release of gluster-block, the CVE and few bug fixes are made available as part of this release. Please find the release notes with notable fixes at [2]. One can find the deta

[Gluster-devel] gluster-block v0.5 is alive!

Hello Gluster folks, Gluster-block team is happy to announce the v0.5 release [1]. This is the new stable version of gluster-block, a good number of features and interesting bug fixes are made available as part of this release. Please find the list of release highlights and notable fixes at [2].

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster on RHEL 8

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:41 PM Barak Sason wrote: > > Greeting all, > > I've made a fresh installation of RHEL 8 on a VM and have been trying to set > up Gluster on that system. > > Running ./autogen.sh completes OK, but running ./config results in an error > regarding missing 'rpcgen'. > 'libt

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] gluster-block v0.4 is alive!

s-well-as IO happens over gfapi. Please go through the docs pointed above, if you have any specific queries, feel free to ask them here or on github. Best Regards, -- Prasanna > > v > > On Mon, May 20, 2019, 8:36 AM Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> >> Hey Vlad, >> >> T

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] gluster-block v0.4 is alive!

ystemd[1]: gluster-blockd.service: main process exited, > code=exited, status=1/FAILURE > May 17 19:13:19 vm2 systemd[1]: Unit gluster-blockd.service entered failed > state. > May 17 19:13:19 vm2 systemd[1]: gluster-blockd.service failed. > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:

[Gluster-devel] gluster-block v0.4 is alive!

Hello Gluster folks, Gluster-block team is happy to announce the v0.4 release [1]. This is the new stable version of gluster-block, lots of new and exciting features and interesting bug fixes are made available as part of this release. Please find the big list of release highlights and notable fi

Re: [Gluster-devel] Network Block device (NBD) on top of glusterfs

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:31 PM Xiubo Li wrote: > On 2019/3/21 18:09, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:00 AM Xiubo Li wrote: > >> All, >> >> I am one of the contributor for gluster-block >> <https://github.com/gluster/gluste

Re: [Gluster-devel] Network Block device (NBD) on top of glusterfs

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:00 AM Xiubo Li wrote: > All, > > I am one of the contributor for gluster-block > [1] project, and also I > contribute to linux kernel and open-iscsi > project.[2] > > NBD was around for some time,

[Gluster-devel] gluster-block Dev Stream Update

Hello Community! Starting this week, we will be sending a (bi)weekly update about the gluster-block development activities. For someone who is catching up with gluster's block storage project for the first time, here is everything that you need to know: - https://github.com/gluster/gluster-block/

Re: [Gluster-devel] reflink support for glusterfs and gluster-block using it for taking snapshots

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi, > I just created a github issue for reflink support(#349) in glusterfs. > We are intending to use this feature to do block snapshots in gluster-block. > > Please let us know your comments on the github issue. I have added th

[Gluster-devel] gluster-block v0.3 is alive!

Hello Gluster folks, We are happy to announce the release of gluster-block [1] v0.3. Please find highlights and notable fixes which went in this release at [2]. The packages are made available at copr for Fedora users [3]. For other distributions, one can easily compile it from source. Details ab

Re: [Gluster-devel] some gluster-block fixes

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2017-06-22 at 16:26 +0200, Michael Adam wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have created a few patches to gluster-block. >> But am a little bit at a loss how to create >> gerrit review requests. Hence I have created >> github PRs. >> >> https://git

[Gluster-devel] gluster-block v0.2.1 is alive!

Hello Gluster folks, gluster-block [1] release 0.2.1 is tagged, this release is more focused on bug fixing. All the documents are updated and packages made available at copr for fedora users [2] However for other distros one can easily compile it from source, find the install guide at [3] The so

[Gluster-devel] gluster-block v0.2 is alive!

Hello Gluster folks, gluster-block [1] is ready with its v0.2 tag, all the documents are updated and packages made available at copr for fedora users [2] However for other distros one can easily compile it from source, find the install guide at [3] The source tar file and community provided pack

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Elasticsearch with gluster-block

uster/commit/2392a76cfa4a08c94602ed5b9201760d828c0ba2 Cheers, -- prasanna On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:49 PM, vincent gromakowski wrote: > Hi > What is the order of magnitude in performance decrease compared to local > storage ? > > Le 16 mars 2017 7:53 AM, "Prasanna Kalever"

[Gluster-devel] Elasticsearch with gluster-block

If you have missed our post on "Elasticsearch with gluster-block" in social media feeds, then here is the nexus [1] [1] https://pkalever.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/elasticsearch-with-gluster-block/ Cheers! -- prasanna ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Glust

Re: [Gluster-devel] Demo in community meetings

Thanks for the opportunity. I will be happy to stream a demo on 'howto gluster-block' tomorrow. -- Prasanna On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Hi All, > > In the last meeting of maintainers, we discussed about reserving 15-30 > minutes in the community meeting for demoing ne

Re: [Gluster-devel] Announcing gluster-block v0.1

Heads up! Packages are made available at download.gluster.org [1] [1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/gluster-block/ Cheers. On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > gluster-block [1] is a block device management framework which aims at > making gluster

[Gluster-devel] Announcing gluster-block v0.1

gluster-block [1] is a block device management framework which aims at making gluster backed block storage creation and maintenance as simple as possible. With this release, gluster-block provisions block devices and exports them using iSCSI. Read about usage, examples and more at [2] The initial

[Gluster-devel] gluster-block design is out

Hello, Here [1] is the gluster-block design document, please feel free to comment. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1psjLlCxdllq1IcJa3FN3MFLcQfXYf0L5amVkZMXd-D8/edit?usp=sharing Thanks, Prasanna ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@glu

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal : Gluster Block Storage CLI Integration

43:05, Niels de Vos wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:28:52AM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> As we know gluster block storage creation and maintanace is not simple >>>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal : Gluster Block Storage CLI Integration

s, -- Prasanna > > Let us know your plans, and what help you may need. > > Thanks, > Shyam > > > On 12/09/2016 03:28 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Atin Mukherjee >> wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to see

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal : Gluster Block Storage CLI Integration

with design phase. Once the block storage team sticks on the design, one of us will definitely update all the required information. -- Prasanna > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Prasanna Kalever > wrote: >> >> Feature Page at https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-sp

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal : Gluster Block Storage CLI Integration

Feature Page at https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-specs/pull/10 -- Prasanna On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > Hi all, > > As we know gluster block storage creation and maintanace is not simple > today, as it involves all the manual steps mentioned at [

[Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal : Gluster Block Storage CLI Integration

Hi all, As we know gluster block storage creation and maintanace is not simple today, as it involves all the manual steps mentioned at [1] To make this basic operations simple we would like to integrate the block story with gluster CLI. As part of it, we would like Introduce the following command

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFs upstream bugzilla components Fine graining

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:09:34PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Muthu Vigneshwaran >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > This an update to the prev

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFs upstream bugzilla components Fine graining

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Muthu Vigneshwaran wrote: > > Hi, > > This an update to the previous mail about Fine graining of the > GlusterFS upstream bugzilla components. > > Finally we have come out a new structure that would help in easy > access of the bug for reporter and assignee too. >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Heketi] Block store related API design discussion

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:34:29PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:06:00PM -0400, Luis Pabón wrote: > > >> Very

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Heketi] Block store related API design discussion

e where the creation of the file could take place. >> >> We can capture our decisions from these discussions in the >> following page: >> >> https://github.com/heketi/heketi/wiki/Proposed-Changes >> >> - Luis >> >> >> - Original Messa

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Heketi] Block store related API design discussion

ter volume to be exposed as a block device. This will help > determine where the creation of the file could take place. > > We can capture our decisions from these discussions in the > following page: > > https://github.com/heketi/heketi/wiki/Proposed-Changes > > - Luis >

[Gluster-devel] [Heketi] Block store related API design discussion

Hi all, This mail is open for discussion on gluster block store integration with heketi and its REST API interface design constraints. ___ Volume Request ... | | PVC claim -> Heketi --->| |

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for QEMU integration for upstream release

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:04:37AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >> hi Bharata, >>What tests are run before the release of glusterfs so that we make >> sure this integration is stable? Could you add that information here so >> t

Re: [Gluster-devel] mainline compilation fails

ild (That much I can assure) Lets see if the regressions break after these patch goes in (mostly not, that I see from the code) Thanks, -- Prasanna On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Saturday 27 August 2016, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> >> Her

Re: [Gluster-devel] mainline compilation fails

Here is the patch that should fix it http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15331/ Happy weekend! -- Prasanna On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > [1] has broken mainline compilation and I feel this could be because its > parent patch is not been merged otherwise smoke should have c

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Hey All, Here is my topic to utter at gluster summit Abstract: Title: GLUSTER AS BLOCK STORE IN CONTAINERS As we all know containers are stateless entities which are used to deploy applications and hence need persistent storage to store application data for availability across container incarna

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggestions for improving the block/gluster driver in QEMU

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:51:11PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: >> > There are some features in QEMU that we could implement with the >> > existing libgfap

Re: [Gluster-devel] Suggestions for improving the block/gluster driver in QEMU

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > There are some features in QEMU that we could implement with the > existing libgfapi functions. Kevin asked me about this a while back, and > I have finally (sorry for the delay Kevin!) taken the time to look into > it. > > There are some opti

Re: [Gluster-devel] What tranpsort type in glfs_set_volfile_server() exactly mean ?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Prasanna Kalever" >> To: "gluster-devel" >> Cc: "Kaushal Madappa" >> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 4:10:24 PM >> Su

[Gluster-devel] What tranpsort type in glfs_set_volfile_server() exactly mean ?

Hey Team, My understanding is that @transport argumet in glfs_set_volfile_server() is meant for specifying transport used in fetching volfile server, IIRC which currently supports tcp and unix only... The doc here https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/api/src/glfs.h +166 shows the rdm

Re: [Gluster-devel] iSCSI

Hi Francis, The tcmu-runner is not available as a pre built package in Ubuntu distro, so you need to build it on your own, honestly I have not tried this on my own but the suggested solution should solve it for you. glfs is supported from initial version of tcmu-runner, so you can take up any la

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs 3.7.11 with LibGFApi in Qemu on Ubuntu Xenial does not work

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:41 PM, André Bauer wrote: > > Hi Lists, > > i just updated on of my Ubuntu KVM Servers from 14.04 (Trusty) to 16.06 > (Xenial). > > I use the Glusterfs packages from the officail Ubuntu PPA and my own > Qemu packages ( > https://launchpad.net/~monotek/+archive/ubuntu/qemu

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Please test Gerrit 2.12.2

> 'Fix' button is visible. May be you are missing something, please check. > > Thanks and Regards, > Kotresh H R > > - Original Message - >> From: "Prasanna Kalever" >> To: "Nigel Babu" >> Cc: "gluster-infra" , "

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Please test Gerrit 2.12.2

Hi Nigel, I don't see 'Fix' button in the comment section which is "fix for a remote code execution exploit" introduced in 2.12.2, it helps us in editing the code in the gerrit web editor instantaneously, hence we don't have to cherry pick the patch every time to address minor code changes. I fee

[Gluster-devel] changing client insecure port ceil

Hello all, please review [1] the above patch changes client insecure port ceiling from 65535 to 49151: current port allocation to various processes (clumsy): 1023 - 1-> client ports range if bind secure is turned on 49151 - 1024 -> fall back to this, if in above case ports exhaust 65

Re: [Gluster-devel] git-branch-diff: wrapper script for git to visualize backports

Hi all, checkout http://review.gluster.org/14230 I have added more cool features in patch set 2 to meet both developers as well as release maintainers expectations. Thanks, -- Prasanna On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Atin Mukher

[Gluster-devel] gerrit-2.12.2 will help us improve address comments faster

Hello Everyone, Gerrit has an exciting news for all of us! The latest version of gerrit-2.12.2 includes a fix for a remote code execution exploit see this at [1]; Current gerrit version which we use is 2.9.4, on a comment at a code line (say for a typo or a white space or correcting log msg), cur

[Gluster-devel] git-branch-diff: wrapper script for git to visualize backports

Hi Team, Checkout glusterfs script that is capable of showing your list of commits missed (backporting) in other branches (say 3.7.12) w.r.t master http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14230/ This script helps in visualizing backported and missed commits between two different branches. While backport

[Gluster-devel] changes to client port range in release 3.1.3

Hi all, The various port ranges in glusterfs as of now: (very high level view) client: In case of bind secure: will start from 1023 - 1, In case all these port exhaust bind to random port (a connect() with out bind() call) In case of bind insecure:

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression failure ./tests/bitrot/bug-1244613.t

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:21:17PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> 12:53:34 Test Summary Report >> 12:53:34 --- >> 12:53:34 ./tests/bitrot/bug-1244613.t (Wstat: 0 Te

[Gluster-devel] regression failure ./tests/bitrot/bug-1244613.t

Hi all, 12:53:34 Test Summary Report 12:53:34 --- 12:53:34 ./tests/bitrot/bug-1244613.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 35 Failed: 2) 12:53:34 Failed tests: 11, 34 which is "TEST mount_nfs $H0:/$V0 $N0;" while trying to mount using nfs I am suspecting that the reason could be "glusterd: def

Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions: tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t fails

, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > Hi all, > > Noticed 'tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t' fails both in CentOs and Netbsd > > https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/16201/console > https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression

[Gluster-devel] regressions: tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t fails

Hi all, Noticed 'tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t' fails both in CentOs and Netbsd https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/16201/console https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/20043/console http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regressi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] regression machines reporting slowly ? here is the reason ...

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 04:22:55PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Prasanna Kalever >> > wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] regression machines reporting slowly ? here is the reason ...

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Noticed our regression machines are reporting back really slow, >> especially CentOs and Smoke >> >> I found that most of the s

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] regression machines reporting slowly ? here is the reason ...

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Noticed our regression machines are reporting back really slow, >> especially CentOs and Smoke >> >> I found that most of the s

[Gluster-devel] regression machines reporting slowly ? here is the reason ...

Hi all, Noticed our regression machines are reporting back really slow, especially CentOs and Smoke I found that most of the slaves are marked offline, this could be the biggest reasons ? Here are their numbers : CentOs slaves: Hardly (2/14) salves are online [1] slave20.cloud.gluster.org

[Gluster-devel] How far are we from clang job/build

Hi all, Here is the current status of clang analysis job, which are likely to be scheduled on centos-ci regression machines. about: clang build will be triggered on every gerrit CR revision, very like similar to how smoke does currently. status: clang job for centos-ci available at https://gith

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Smoke results voting

ailure then he can re-trigger via 'recheck *' Thanks, -- Prasanna > >> >> [1] https://review.gluster.org/13898 >> [2] https://review.gluster.org/13869 >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Prasanna Kalever >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Smoke results voting

oke=+1 > ,` As Kaushal mentioned above 1. users are free to comment "recheck smoke" (which will trigger smoke) 2. only after success on step 1, administrators will get +1 done with 'ssh ...' Thanks, -- Prasanna > > I'm still figuring out how to solve it properly

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Smoke results voting

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Did anyone notice that for few of the patches smoke results are not voted > back? > > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13869 is one of them. +1 Here is another one http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11083/ I have also re-triggered it with "recheck

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] freebsd-smoke failures

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > I've seen a lot of patches blocked lately by this: > > > BD xlator requested but required lvm2 development library not found. > Hi Jeff, IIRC, this happens because in the build job use "--enable-bd-xlator" option while configure; but looks lik

Re: [Gluster-devel] Requesting for help with gluster test framework

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi all, > > As I am trying to write a test for the WORM translator > which I am working on right now, I am facing some issues > while executing the test framework. > I followed the steps in > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/m

Re: [Gluster-devel] Wanted - 3.7.5 release manager

Hi Pranith, If you need any assistance please let me know, I will be happy to learn this. Thanks & regards, Prasanna Kumar K - Original Message - From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" To: "Vijay Bellur" , "Atin Mukherjee" Cc: "Gluster Devel" Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 7:34:08 PM Su

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Plans for Gluster 3.8

Hi Athin :) I shall take Bug 1245380 [RFE] Render all mounts of a volume defunct upon access revocation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245380 Thanks & Regards, Prasanna Kumar K. - Original Message - From: "Atin Mukherjee" To: "Kaushal M" Cc: "Csaba Henk" , gluster-us..

Re: [Gluster-devel] gfapi 3.6.3 QEMU 2.3 Ubuntu 14.04 testing

think of that later. I am expecting some kind of scripts that helped you to produce segfaults in QEMU 2.0 + Ubuntu 14.04 + gluster 3.6.3 (libgfapi). Thanks & Regards, Prasanna Kumar K. - Original Message - From: "Josh Boon" To: "Prasanna Kalever" Cc: "Gl

Re: [Gluster-devel] gfapi 3.6.3 QEMU 2.3 Ubuntu 14.04 testing

hes I feel qemu- 2.3.0 doesn't have the segfaults issue. Please revert back for any information if required. Thanks & regards, Prasanna Kumar K. - Original Message - From: "Prasanna Kalever" To: "Josh Boon" Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "S

Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious failures tests/bugs/tier/bug-1205545-CTR-and-trash-integration.t

descending order, as a result port clash is minimized, also it fixes issues in rdma too Thanks to Raghavendra Talur for help in discovering the real cause Regards, Prasanna Kalever - Original Message - From: "Raghavendra Talur" To: "Krishnan Parthasarathi" Cc

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal: Using LLVM clang-analyzer in gluster development

Message - From: "Ira Cooper" To: "Prasanna Kalever" Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:54:31 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal: Using LLVM clang-analyzer in gluster development Prasanna, have you compared the results to the ones we see

Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal: Using LLVM clang-analyzer in gluster development

el] Proposal: Using LLVM clang-analyzer in gluster development On 05/27/2015 12:24 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:00:25PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> On 26 May 2015 17:30, "Prasanna Kalever" wrote: >>> >>> Hi gluster team, >>&

[Gluster-devel] Proposal: Using LLVM clang-analyzer in gluster development

Hi gluster team, Proposal: Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project About Clang: >From a very high level view, Clang has two features 1. Clang as a compiler 2. Clang as a code analyzer The Idea hear is to use second point i.e Clang as code analyzer and still gcc will be our def

[Gluster-devel] Proposal: Using LLVM clang-analyzer in gluster development

Hi gluster team, Proposal: Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project About Clang: >From a very high level view, Clang has two features 1. Clang as a compiler 2. Clang as a code analyzer The Idea hear is to use second point i.e Clang as code analyzer and still gcc will be our defa