Hi guys, I wanted to share my experiences with Go. I have been using it
for the past few months and I have to say I am very impressed. Instead
of writing a massive email I created a blog entry:
http://goo.gl/g9abOi
Hope this helps.
- Luis
On 09/05/2014 11:44 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
Does
Hi guys, I wanted to share my experiences with Go. I have been using it
for the past few months and I have to say I am very impressed. Instead
of writing a massive email I created a blog entry:
http://goo.gl/g9abOi
Fantastic. Thanks, Luis!
___
On 11/09/2014, at 2:51 AM, Luis Pabón wrote:
I think the real question is, Why do we depend on core files? What does it
provide? If we rethink how we may do debugging, we may realize that we only
require core files because we are used to it and it is familiar to us. Now,
I am not saying
On 09/08/2014 10:29 PM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
While the proposal for Glusterd-2.0 is doing its rounds in the devel/users
lists, let me find out how the Go toolchain fares in debugging a live
application and a core file, with a dash of go routines and channels for good
effect :-)
Darcy jda...@redhat.com
Cc: Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org, Gluster Devel
gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Friday, September 5, 2014 5:32:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Languages (was Re: Proposal for GlusterD-2.0)
One reason to use c++ could be to build components that we wish
Two characteristics of a language (tool chain) are important to me,
especially
when you spend a good part of your time debugging failures/bugs.
- Analysing core files.
- Ability to reason about space consumption. This becomes important in
the case of garbage collected languages.
I
Parthasarathi kpart...@redhat.com
Cc: Dan Lambright dlamb...@redhat.com, Gluster Devel
gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2014 8:14:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Languages (was Re: Proposal for GlusterD-2.0)
Two characteristics of a language (tool chain) are important
While the proposal for Glusterd-2.0 is doing its rounds in the devel/users
lists, let me find out how the Go toolchain fares in debugging a live
application and a core file, with a dash of go routines and channels for good
effect :-) Shouldn't take long. I will share my experience and lets take
: Re: [Gluster-devel] Languages (was Re: Proposal for GlusterD-2.0)
One reason to use c++ could be to build components that we wish to share with
ceph. (Not that I know of any at this time). Also c++0x11 has improved the
language.
But the more I hear about it, the more interesting go sounds
