The detail in this response is much appreciated. Thank you.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> For Fedora/RHEL/CentOS rpms:
>
> + People file bugs, e.g. against Fedora/glusterfs or
> GlusterFS/packaging, and we fix them.
>
> + Some of us
On 06/28/2016 08:07 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
>
> I have a follow-up question on the production of these artifacts -
> when do we check whether the RPMs or, the images produced are sane?
> For example, that the RPMs are packaged well and as per specifications
> ...
>
For
[and yes, NOW with gluster-devel-on CC, sorry for the duplicate]
[changed subject and added gluster-devel on CC]
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:37:17AM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > Coincidentally I've asked Humble