Hi,
Ok, the basic setup is 6 bricks per server, 2 servers. Mirror the six
bricks and DHT them.
I'm running three tests, dd 1G of zeros to the gluster mount, dd 1000
100k files and dd 1000 1M files.
With 3M write-behind I get:
0m35.460s for 1G file
0m52.427s for 100k files
1m37.209s for 1M fil
Hello all,
I really do wonder if any of you does rsync onto glusterfs. I can't hardly
believe that, because 2.0.6 as every single release before has broken mtimes
on non-empty directories. Am I really the only one recognising this
fundamental flaw?
--
Regards,
Stephan
- "Stephan von Krawczynski" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I really do wonder if any of you does rsync onto glusterfs. I can't
> hardly believe that, because 2.0.6 as every single release before has broken
> mtimes on non-empty directories. Am I really the only one recognising this
> fundamental f
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:01:46 +0200
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I really do wonder if any of you does rsync onto glusterfs. I can't hardly
> believe that, because 2.0.6 as every single release before has broken mtimes
> on non-empty directories. Am I really the only one recogn
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:01:46 +0200
And, I forgot to mention: it took me around 1 hour of bonnie to crash a server
in a classical distribute setup...
This is new to us. We have done quite a bit of testing with bonnie++ and
did not encounter issues. Can you ple
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:22:11 +0200
> Von: Stephan von Krawczynski
> An: gluster-users@gluster.org
> Betreff: Re: [Gluster-users] 2.0.6
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:01:46 +0200
> Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I really do wonder i
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
And, I forgot to mention: it took me around 1 hour of bonnie to crash a server
in a classical distribute setup...
Please stop featurism and start reliability.
What is your problem?? How much code have you contributed to this project?
I am si
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, the basic setup is 6 bricks per server, 2 servers. Mirror the six
> bricks and DHT them.
>
> I'm running three tests, dd 1G of zeros to the gluster mount, dd 1000
> 100k files and dd 1000 1M files.
>
> With 3M write-behind I get:
> 0
> [lots of flame by Steve]
> Steve
Dear Steve,
generally you are right. It would possibly be more helpful if I did a lot of
debug work and maybe even code some patches. But the simple truth is, I don't
have the spare time. So currently all I can do is to point at every single
release and post a
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:37:18 +0200
> Von: Stephan von Krawczynski
> An: "Steve"
> CC: gluster-users@gluster.org
> Betreff: Re: [Gluster-users] 2.0.6
>
> > [lots of flame by Steve]
> > Steve
>
> Dear Steve,
>
Lieber Stephan (Ja! Ich kann Deutsch. Bin
HI all:
My glusterfs storage was using for xen images , which configure afr+dht
,but had some error
the core error message was :
GNU gdb 6.6
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to
HI all:
I met some error in glusterfs2.0.0
2009-08-19 12:04:52 E [afr-self-heal-metadata.c:727:afr_sh_metadata_lk_cbk]
afr1: locking of / on child 0 failed: Success
2009-08-19 12:04:52 E [afr-self-heal-metadata.c:727:afr_sh_metadata_lk_cbk]
afr1: locking of / on child 1 failed: Success
12 matches
Mail list logo
