In my setup, I just need to have a 2-node replicated volume. DATA CONSISTENCY
BETWEEN THE BRICKS IS THE PRIMARY CONCERN. So does that mean, 3.3.2 is a better
option. At present I'm using
"glusterfs 3.3.1 built on Oct 11 2012 21:49:37".
Thanks & Regards,
Bobby Jacob
P SAVE TREES. Please don't pri
Howdy,
I was looking over the latest release of gluster and saw
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/authentication.txt
in the repo and saw the lines about username and password auth. Is
there any docs explaining how authentication works or is setup. I
failed at finding anything
On 07/22/2013 11:43 AM, Todd Stansell wrote:
I never got any responses to this. Anyone have any thoughts?
Todd
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 03:22:40PM +, Todd Stansell wrote:
Does anyone know if enabling profiling all the time is okay to do? I'm
worried that the accounting pieces might cause
On 07/18/2013 02:28 PM, Jacob Yundt wrote:
2. In release Notes for 3.4.0 it is stated that ext4-issue has been
addressed - does this mean that it is safe to use ext4 with later
kernels now?
There are no known problems with ext4 and 3.4.0, even with newer kernels.
Just to be perfectly clear, d
On 07/22/2013 05:21 AM, s19n wrote:
* Vijay Bellur [2013 07 18, 00:00]:
There are no known problems with ext4 and 3.4.0, even with newer kernels.
What about 3.3.2? Does the same apply for 3.3.2?
Yes.
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gl
I never got any responses to this. Anyone have any thoughts?
Todd
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 03:22:40PM +, Todd Stansell wrote:
> Does anyone know if enabling profiling all the time is okay to do? I'm
> worried that the accounting pieces might cause increased memory usage over
> time or some o
I'm not sure there was ever a bug reported.
I was testing a 2 machine cluster with replica 2 and I was doing a simple
write then power failed one. The other machine took over and I brought the
one back up and it caused split-brain. I looked at the code and found
self-heal was not activating correct
Hello.
I have gluster 3.3.2-ubuntu1~precise1 running on Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS
(Precise).
I mount a gluster volume via NFS with the following mount options:
"defaults,nfsvers=3,proto=tcp". (I figured it might be better to mount via
NFS to take advantage of the caching in the NFS client, the files bei
Any chance of a lucid package for 3.3.2? I'm feeling orphaned in LTS-land!
https://launchpad.net/~semiosis/+archive/ubuntu-glusterfs-3.3
Marcus
--
Marcus Bointon
Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/
UK info@hand CRM solutions
mar...@synchromedia.co.uk | http://www.sync
Hello,
On 17.7.2013. 20:30, Vijay Bellur wrote:
3.4.0 rdma code is much different from 3.3.0. 3.4 makes use of rdma
connection manager and we would like to make that implementation more
mature. Testing is what will help us get there and if you plan to run
tests with RDMA, I would prefer that 3.
Where may I find release docs. on what is new on 3.3.2, and which release
should I lean towards if I want to head into production?
Thanks,
Khoi
From: gluster-users-requ...@gluster.org
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Date: 07/19/2013 06:59 AM
Subject:Gluster-users Digest, Vol
Hi Khoi,
I found a large changelog in the source package
http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.3.2.tar.gz
For production, depends on what you are going to do.
If you work a lot with virtual machine, then 3.4.0 will probably what you want.
We are stay with 3.3.2 (upgrdae
On 07/22/2013 05:51 PM, s19n wrote:
* Vijay Bellur [2013 07 18, 00:00]:
There are no known problems with ext4 and 3.4.0, even with newer kernels.
What about 3.3.2? Does the same apply for 3.3.2?
Yes, the same applies to 3.3.2 as well.
Regards,
Vijay
__
* Vijay Bellur [2013 07 18, 00:00]:
> There are no known problems with ext4 and 3.4.0, even with newer kernels.
What about 3.3.2? Does the same apply for 3.3.2?
Regards
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluste
14 matches
Mail list logo
