Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-06-03 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Sounds related to this: Reminder: 3.5.2 centos7 [2015-06-02 15:26:18.373590] I [master(/export/raid/usr_global):445:crawlwrap] _GMaster: 20 crawls, 0 turns [2015-06-02 15:27:20.3036] I [master(/export/raid/usr_global):445:crawlwrap] _GMaster: 20 crawls, 0 turns [2015-06-02 15:27:51.6190] I [mas

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-06-02 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Sure, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2663552/logs.tgz Yesterday I restart the geo-rep (and reset the changelog.changelog option). Today it looks converged and changelog keeps doing his job. BUT hybridcrawl doesn’t seem to update symlink links if they changed on master: From master: ll -

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-06-01 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Some news, Looks like changelog is not working anymore. When I touch a file in master it doesnt propagate to slave… .processing folder contain a thousand of changelog not processed. I had to stop the geo-rep, reset changelog.changelog to the volume and restart the geo-rep. It’s now sending mis

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-28 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
So, to sum up, I finally found a workaround: Get the diff between master and vol for data rsync -avn —delete src dst > liste.txt From here I delete deleted files from the slave. It was easy. Now update the mismatched gfid… I removed the unsynced files from the slave On master I do a cp myfile

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-28 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Oh and by the way, I’m using 3.5.2 so I don’t have the http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9370/ feature you add… -- Cyril Peponnet On May 28, 2015, at 8:54 AM, Cyril Peponnet mailto:cyril.pepon...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Hi Kotresh, Inline. Again, thank for you time. -- Cyril Peponnet On Ma

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-28 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
One more thing: nfs.volume-access read-only works only for nfs clients, glusterfs client have still write access features.read-only on need a vol restart and set RO for everyone but in this case, geo-rep goes faulty. [2015-05-28 09:42:27.917897] E [repce(/export/raid/usr_global):188:__call__]

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-28 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Hi Kotresh, Inline. Again, thank for you time. -- Cyril Peponnet > On May 27, 2015, at 10:47 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar > wrote: > > Hi Cyril, > > Replies inline. > > Thanks and Regards, > Kotresh H R > > - Original Message - >> From: "Cyril N PEPONNET (Cyril)" >> To: "Kot

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-27 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Hi and thanks again for those explanation. Due to lot of missing files and not up to date (with gfid mismatch some time), I reset the index (or I think I do) by: deleting the geo-reop, reset geo-replication.indexing (set it to off does not work for me), and recreate it again. So for now it’s s

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-26 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
So, changelog is still active but I notice that some file were missing. So I ‘m running a rsync -avn between the two vol (master and slave) to sync then again by touching the missing files (hopping geo-rep will do the rest). One question, can I pass the slave vol a RO ? Because if somebody chang

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-25 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Thanks for the clarification. Regarding our setup the xsync is done, but I had to force the change.detector to changelog (not switched automatiquely even after a geo-rep stop / restart). Now change log is enabled, let see how it behave :) -- Cyril Peponnet On May 25, 2015, at 12:43 AM, Kotresh

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-22 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
One last question, correct me if I’m wrong. When you start a geo-rep process it starts with xsync aka hybrid crawling (sending files every 60s, with files windows set as 8192 files per sent). When the crawl is done it should use changelog detector and dynamically change things to slaves. 1/ Du

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-21 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Thanks to JoeJulian / Kaushal I managed to re-enable the changelog option and the socket is now present. For the record I had some clients running rhs gluster-fuse and our nodes are running glusterfs release and op-version are not “compatible”. Now I have to wait for the init crawl see if it sw

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-21 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Hi, Unfortunately, # gluster vol set usr_global changelog.changelog off volume set: failed: Staging failed on mvdcgluster01.us.alcatel-lucent.com. Error: One or more connected clients cannot support the feature being set. These clients need to be upgraded or disconnected before running this com

[Gluster-users] Geo-Replication - Changelog socket is not present - Falling back to xsync

2015-05-18 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Hi Gluster Community, I have a 3 nodes setup at location A and a two node setup at location B. All running 3.5.2 under Centos-7. I have one volume I sync through georeplication process. So far so good, the first step of geo-replication is done (hybrid-crawl). Now I’d like to use the change log

[Gluster-users] op-version issue on 3 nodes setup

2015-02-12 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Hi, We had an outage in our gluster setup and I had to rm -rf /var/lib/gluster/* I rebuild the setup from scratch but op-version for volumes is set as 2 for op-version and client-op-version. op-version in glusterd.info is 30501. The main issue is when I try to set property it fails only for ce

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-02-02 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
(master). I still don’t understand why I have 3 masters… -- Cyril Peponnet On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:00 AM, PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril) mailto:cyril.pepon...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: But now I have strange issue: After creating the geo-rep session and starting it (from nodeB): [root@nodeB]# g

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-02-02 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
0 So. 1/Why there is 3 masters nodes ??? nodeB should be the master node only 2/Why it kept changing turn by turn from active to passive? Thanks -- Cyril Peponnet On Feb 2, 2015, at 10:40 AM, PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril) mailto:cyril.pepon...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-02-02 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
For the record, after adding operating-version=2 on every nodes (ABC) AND slave node, the commands are working -- Cyril Peponnet On Feb 2, 2015, at 9:46 AM, PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril) mailto:cyril.pepon...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: More informations here: I update the state of the p

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-02-02 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
/log/glusterfs/cli.log <== [2015-02-02 17:44:49.308493] I [input.c:36:cli_batch] 0-: Exiting with: -1 I have only one node… I don’t understand the meaning of the errror: One or more nodes do not support the required op version. -- Cyril Peponnet On Feb 2, 2015, at 8:49 AM, PEPONNET, Cyri

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-02-02 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
mailto:avish...@redhat.com>> wrote: Looks like node C is in diconnected state. Please let us know the output of `gluster peer status` from all the master nodes and slave nodes. -- regards Aravinda On 01/22/2015 12:27 AM, PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril) wrote: So, On master node of my 3 node set

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-01-21 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
wrote: On 01/20/2015 11:01 PM, PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril) wrote: Hi, I’m ready for new testing, I delete the geo-rep session between master and slace, remove the lines in authorized keys file on slave. I also remove the common secret pem from slave, and from master. There is only the gsyncd_templat

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-01-20 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
t; slave_ip=gluster-slave01 > > Also let us know the GlusterFS version in Master nodes and Slave nodes. > > -- > regards > Aravinda > > On 01/15/2015 09:12 PM, PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril) wrote: >> [2015-01-15 15:38:13.676252] E [run.c:190:runner_log] 0-management: Fai

Re: [Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-01-15 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
glusterd/geo-replication/common_secret.pem.pub > slave_ip=gluster-slave01 > > Also let us know the GlusterFS version in Master nodes and Slave nodes. > > -- > regards > Aravinda > > On 01/15/2015 09:12 PM, PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril) wrote: >> [2015-01-15 15:38

[Gluster-users] Geo-Replication push-pem actually does'nt append common_secret_pub.pem to authrorized_keys file

2015-01-14 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Folks, Gluster 3.5.2-1.el7 under centos7 Using gluster create master_vol slave::slave_vol create push-pem force (slave volume already contains data) doesn’t append the keys to the authorized_keys file. Looks like peer_add_secret_pub is not executed or fails at some point. No error from cli

Re: [Gluster-users] Conflicting entries for symlinks between bricks (Trusted.gfid not consistent)

2014-04-21 Thread PEPONNET, Cyril N (Cyril)
Hi, I will try to reproduce this in a vagrant-cluster environnement. If it can help, here is the time line of the event. t0: 2 serveurs in replicate mode no issue t1: power down server1 due to hardware issue t2: server2 still continue to serve files through NFS and fuse, and still continue to b