Hi,
http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
Regards,
J
On 2015-09-22 10:04, Andreas Hollaus wrote:
Hi,
Are there any restrictions as to when I'm allowed to make changes to
the GlusterFS
volume (for instance: start/stop volume, add/remove brick or peer)? How
will it
handle such changes whe
erFS)(?). Maybe the extended attribute should have been replaced as well
as the
configuration files?
BTW: Yes, I rely on GlusterFS commands and avoid manual editing of files.
Regards
Andreas
> I hope that will answer your doubt.
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
> Gaurav Garg
ndreas Hollaus"
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:32:08 PM
Subject: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS 3.7
Hi,
Are there any restrictions as to when I'm allowed to make changes to the
GlusterFS
volume (for instance: start/stop volume, add/remove brick or p
Hi & thanks,
Well, obviously my intention is not to create a mess, but the reason for
redundancy is probably that servers may disappear from the cluster for a
while. In case I run any glusterfs commands related to the volume
definition at that time, those changes will not reach the unavailable
glusterd should handle syncing any changes you make with the "gluster"
command to the peers, obviously if you make local changes to the volume
file on one server you are likely to break things unless you copy rsync the
changes to the other server.
On 22 September 2015 at 04:02, Andreas Hollaus w
Hi,
Are there any restrictions as to when I'm allowed to make changes to the
GlusterFS
volume (for instance: start/stop volume, add/remove brick or peer)? How will it
handle such changes when one of my two replicated servers is down? How will
GlusterFS
know which set of configuration files it ca
Hi,
Are there any restrictions as to when I'm allowed to make changes to the
GlusterFS
volume (for instance: start/stop volume, add/remove brick or peer)? How will it
handle such changes when one of my two replicated servers is down? How will
GlusterFS
know which set of configuration files it ca
"Pranith Kumar Karampuri" ,
>> gluster-users@gluster.org
>> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 8:37:08 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS 3.7 - slow/poor performances
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Do you know more about?
>>
>> In addition, do you
om: "Geoffrey Letessier"
>> To: "Ben Turner"
>> Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" ,
>> gluster-users@gluster.org
>> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 8:37:08 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS 3.7 - slow/poor performances
>>
>> He
- Original Message -
> From: "Geoffrey Letessier"
> To: "Ben Turner"
> Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , gluster-users@gluster.org
> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 8:37:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS 3.7 - slow/poor performances
>
Do you see a perf problem with just a simple DD or do you need a more
>> complex workload to hit the issue? I think I saw an issue with metadata
>> performance that I am trying to run down, let me know if you can see the
>> problem with simple DD reads / writes or if we need to d
saw an issue with metadata performance
> that I am trying to run down, let me know if you can see the problem with
> simple DD reads / writes or if we need to do some sort of dir / metadata
> access as well.
>
> -b
>
> - Original Message -----
>> From: "Geof
ginal Message -
> From: "Geoffrey Letessier"
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:09:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS 3.7 - slow/poor performances
>
> Hi Pranith,
>
> I’m so
Hi Pranith,I’m sorry but I cannot bring you any comparison because comparison will be distorted by the fact in my HPC cluster in production the network technology is InfiniBand QDR and my volumes are quite different (brick in RAID6 (12x2TB), 2 bricks per server and 4 servers into my pool)Concerning
hi Geoffrey,
Since you are saying it happens on all types of volumes,
lets do the following:
1) Create a dist-repl volume
2) Set the options etc you need.
3) enable gluster volume profile using "gluster volume profile
start"
4) run the work load
5) give output of "gluster volume
Dear all,
I have a crash test cluster where i’ve tested the new version of GlusterFS
(v3.7) before upgrading my HPC cluster in production.
But… all my tests show me very very low performances.
For my benches, as you can read below, I do some actions (untar, du, find, tar,
rm) with linux kernel
It is working. Thanks Kaleb
Regards
Backer
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 05/19/2015 10:17 AM, Mohamed Pakkeer wrote:
>
>> Hi GlusterFS experts,
>>
>> I am trying to compile GlusterFS 3.7 on Ubuntu 14.04 and getting
>> following error
>>
>> checking sys/acl.h usabi
On 05/19/2015 10:17 AM, Mohamed Pakkeer wrote:
Hi GlusterFS experts,
I am trying to compile GlusterFS 3.7 on Ubuntu 14.04 and getting
following error
checking sys/acl.h usability... no
checking sys/acl.h presence... no
checking for sys/acl.h... no
configure: error: Support for POSIX ACLs is req
Hi GlusterFS experts,
I am trying to compile GlusterFS 3.7 on Ubuntu 14.04 and getting following
error
checking sys/acl.h usability... no
checking sys/acl.h presence... no
checking for sys/acl.h... no
configure: error: Support for POSIX ACLs is required
node001:~/glusterfs-3.7.0$
Ubuntu 14.04 en
19 matches
Mail list logo
