Torbjorn Granlund writes:
> > __gmpn_gcdext_lehmer_n
>
> I think this would make sense as public, under a different name, e.g.,
> mpn_gcdext_n_basecase.
>
> Maybe. We need to worry about the itch/scratch interface. For user
> interface code, it seems to mak
Torbjorn Granlund writes:
> And this. (I think I'd prefer
>
> mp_limb_t
> mpn_cnd_add_n (mp_limb_t cnd, mp_ptr rp, mp_srcptr ap, mp_srcptr bp,
> mp_size_t n)
>
> but that's a minor detail, and view the cnd_-prefix as a family of
> functions. Some other potential members are m
Torbjorn Granlund writes:
> ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
>
> Here are some comments on a few that stood out.
>
> Thanks!
I think I'll reply in one mail per function (-group).
> I didn't list __gmpn_add_n_sub_n as public since I consider it
> experimental. It seemed like a g
About gmp-func-list.txt. Note that this file was laid out for easy
automated processing for the shared library overhead reduction project.
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
Here are some comments on a few that stood out.
Thanks!
> __gmpn_add_n_sub_n
Torbjorn Granlund writes:
> As a start, I automatically made a list of symbols.
Here are some comments on a few that stood out.
> __gmpn_add_n_sub_n
> __gmpn_add_nc
I think these make sense as public (we'd need to investigate how
Richard Henderson writes:
Excellent. That's more or less exactly what I want to do.
That would be another welcome contribution!
I believe that IFUNC and the "fallback" fat system can live side-by side,
sharing most of the actual logic. The choice of which implementation to build
int
On 02/28/2013 12:50 AM, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> Richard Henderson writes:
>
> Several times over the past week as I debug my neon routines, it has
> become painfully apparent (as I accidentally single-step into the
> dynamic linker) that the shared libgmp could use some help in
> moder
On 02/28/2013 03:14 AM, bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it wrote:
>> We could start there, and wait for the screams. :-)
>
> Our own test-suite will let the first scream out !-D
Yes, I know. The solution that I like best is to do such unit testing
statically, rather than disturbing symbols exported from
I try to classify things on my list a bit further, and correct errors.
I stumbed over some functions. I need feedback here.
mpn_div_qr_2 is decl but not doc.
I suggest we move the declaration to gmp-impl.h.
mpn_divrem_2 is decl but not doc.
I suggest we move the declaration to gmp-impl.h.
mpn_g
On 2013-02-28 12:51:29 +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
>
> > I don't understand why changing the __ prefix to a gmp_ or libgmp_
> > namespace would be a problem.
>
> It breaks ABI compatibility (but that's no big problem, since I think we
> all agree the change should be don
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> I don't understand why changing the __ prefix to a gmp_ or libgmp_
> namespace would be a problem.
It breaks ABI compatibility (but that's no big problem, since I think we
all agree the change should be done only when we have some other good
reason to break the ABI). An
bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it writes:
Il Gio, 28 Febbraio 2013 9:50 am, Torbjorn Granlund ha scritto:
> Richard Henderson writes:
> We are at least aware of these things ("Calls and linkage"):
> https://gmplib.org/devel/GMPng.html
> But the first thing to do is to confirm exactly what A
Ciao,
Il Gio, 28 Febbraio 2013 9:50 am, Torbjorn Granlund ha scritto:
> Richard Henderson writes:
> We are at least aware of these things ("Calls and linkage"):
> https://gmplib.org/devel/GMPng.html
> But the first thing to do is to confirm exactly what API symbols
> should be exported. I'm
On 2013-02-28 10:43:20 +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> But I don't think using a __ prefix on symbols is appropriate, it would
> be better to use the namespace gmp_* or maybe libgmp_*.
>
> I disagree.
>
> Any solution here is a compromise. An
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
I think it make sense with some level of name mangling from API symbols
to linker names. First, it's good practice to use a single prefix for
all linker symbols, while it's nice to use multiple prefixes for API
symbols (mpz_*, mpn_*, gmp_*, ...).
Torbjorn Granlund writes:
> There are some specific GNU/Linux loader features which were
> discusssed here not long ago. I prefer to start portable, then do
> unportable tweaks. (Yes, the GNU system is the most important goal
> for the GNU project, but I want GMP to be great on every reasonable
From: Torbjorn Granlund
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:50:29 +0100
> One reason for this is that we put some mpn functions in libc. They
> were there for many years, and last time I looked they where still
> there. We don't ever want to replace libc's internal routines for
> people that also link to
Richard Henderson writes:
Several times over the past week as I debug my neon routines, it has
become painfully apparent (as I accidentally single-step into the
dynamic linker) that the shared libgmp could use some help in
modernizing its internal linkage.
We are at least aware of thes
18 matches
Mail list logo
