[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have been trying to generate .rtp, .top files from having input of .gro
file for particular molecule in gromacs. I tried this with (x2top) command
implemented in gromacs but i have encountered a problem while executing
this command , that i am mentioning below.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have been trying to generate .rtp, .top files from having input of .gro
file for particular molecule in gromacs. I tried this with (x2top) command
implemented in gromacs but i have encountered a problem while executing
this command , that i am mentioning below.
Hi all,
I have been trying to generate .rtp, .top files from having input of .gro
file for particular molecule in gromacs. I tried this with (x2top) command
implemented in gromacs but i have encountered a problem while executing
this command , that i am mentioning below.
Fatal error: Library file
Hi all,
I have been trying to generate .rtp, .top files from having input of .gro
file for particular molecule in gromacs. I tried this with (x2top) command
implemented in gromacs but i have encountered a problem while executing
this command , that i am mentioning below.
Fatal error: Library file
shall you find them yourself first?
/src/mdlib/*fft*
Actual FFT is done by FFTW.
Regards,
Yang Ye
xuji wrote:
xuji wrote:
>
> Hi all gromacs users:
>
> I am digging into the PME method in gromacs. Can someone tell
> me what files have something to do with PME and the corresponding
> method FFT?
>From the gromacs source directory, try
find * -name "*pme*"
and
grep -i pme src/*/*.c include/*.h include
Hi all gromacs users:
I am digging into the PME method in gromacs. Can someone tell
me what files have something to do with PME and the corresponding
method FFT?
Thanks!
Best wishes!
Ji Xu
Institute of Process Engineering
Chinese Academy of Sciences
P.O.Box 353, Beijing, 100080, China
Tel
Steven Kirk wrote:
Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
"Non-Protein" serves well here. So a usual tc-grps line has "Protein
Non-Protein" for a protein simulation.
Mark
A supplementary question.
The tc-grps line can take predefined standard group names such as
'System', 'Protein' and '
ABEL Stephane 175950 wrote:
I used the following command
./do_dssp -s test.SecStruc.tpr with test.SecStruc.tpr is a pdb file with a part is show below. I obtained a segmentation fault.
Maybe it is not a the good command. Remember that my trajectories are not made/compatible with GROMACS and
I used the following command
./do_dssp -s test.SecStruc.tpr with test.SecStruc.tpr is a pdb file with a part
is show below. I obtained a segmentation fault.
Maybe it is not a the good command. Remember that my trajectories are not
made/compatible with GROMACS and i have only a pdb coordinat
Hmmm, thanks. An obvious solution, but I had not yet thought of that
myself.
Well, you know what they say:
Een dag niets geleerd is een dag niet geleefd! ;-)
>Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:27:38 +0100
>From: David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Dihedral with parameters s
Prasad Gajula wrote:
Dear Dr. David,
Thank you very for the reply.
When i looked the energy minimized average structure it looks just fine.
??
but you did not say energy minimized... check the rmsd between average
and minimized average structure as well.
Maybe you want to do a clustering analy
Dear Dr. David,
Thank you very for the reply.
When i looked the energy minimized average structure it looks just fine.
??
>>>
>> I calcualted the average structure from the simulation trajectory. when
>> I
>> calculate the rmsd of the protein to this average sturture, it is giving
>> average rmsd
Prasad Gajula wrote:
Dear Groamcs users,
I calcualted the average structure from the simulation trajectory. when I
calculate the rmsd of the protein to this average sturture, it is giving
average rmsd of 0.16 nm. But, it is not clear for me why the average
sturcture is never adapted rmsd near (o
Dear Groamcs users,
I calcualted the average structure from the simulation trajectory. when I
calculate the rmsd of the protein to this average sturture, it is giving
average rmsd of 0.16 nm. But, it is not clear for me why the average
sturcture is never adapted rmsd near (or equal) to zero. I did
When actually building the topology I find it easiest to create the residues in
the relevant .rtp and allow pdb2gmx to build the topology for you. However, all
this does is correctly connect everything and put your parameters where they
should be. All previous comments (in this thread and the h
van Bemmelen wrote:
OK. Now I'm confused. What did you mean by the second part?
Of course, when doing FEP with the B state different, you would
gradually introduce a dihedral as lambda increases. But that would still
mean that setting all dihedral parameters to 0 for the A state would be
exactly
Quoting ABEL Stephane 175950 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi gromacs users
> >
> > For my work I have performed some simulations of a protein in water with an
> other MD software not compatible with >GROMACS. And I would like to compute
> the time evolution of the secondary structure of my protein, I
Protein are defined by the residue names inside aminoacids.dat. So, it
is possible for nucleic acid to be "Protein".
Steven Kirk wrote:
Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: Targeted MD
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Conten
Hi Soni,
I have never had such problems, but only some suggestions:
1) Try the PRODRG beta server
(http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/cgi-bin/prodrg_beta)
2) Try drawing your molecule (or part of it) directly with the JME
editor, included on the PRODRG website
3) Try using another input file type,
Hi Soni,
I have never had such problems, but only some suggestions:
1) Try the PRODRG beta server
(http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/cgi-bin/prodrg_beta)
2) Try drawing your molecule (or part of it) directly with the JME
editor, included on the PRODRG website
3) Try using another input file type,
OK. Now I'm confused. What did you mean by the second part?
Of course, when doing FEP with the B state different, you would
gradually introduce a dihedral as lambda increases. But that would still
mean that setting all dihedral parameters to 0 for the A state would be
exactly equivalent to having
Mufaddal Soni wrote:
Dear users,
I am working with PTP1B protein. Recently I tried to
run it in gromacs along with an inhibitor
{[7-(DIFLUORO-PHOSPHONO-METHYL)-NAPHTHALEN-
2-YL]-DIFLUORO-METHYL}-PHOSPHONIC ACID[FNP in short]. The problem
is that gromacs does not recogniz
Hi gromacs users
In previous message Mark Abraham. said me that do_dssp tools can be used only
with a pdb file (thank to him ;))). I am newbie with gromacs (i came from the
ORAC MD world), so i have two questions
1 °) Can do_dssp can be used with "only" one pdb file with some configurations
> Hi gromacs users
>
> For my work I have performed some simulations of a protein in water with an
> other MD software not compatible with >GROMACS. And I would like to compute
> the time evolution of the secondary structure of my protein, I know that the
> >with >the xpm2ps tool give in gromacs
Quoting Mufaddal Soni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear users,
> I am working with PTP1B protein. Recently I tried to run it
> in gromacs along with an inhibitor
> {[7-(DIFLUORO-PHOSPHONO-METHYL)-NAPHTHALEN- 2-YL]-DIFLUORO-METHYL}-PHOSPHONIC
> ACID[FNP in short]. The problem is that
Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: Targeted MD
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
wei-xin xu wrote:
> Some hints on practices that generally *not a good idea* to us
Mark Abraham wrote:
tangxuan wrote:
Mark Abraham wrote:
tangxuan wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I have another question. I can get the
coordinates covariance by option -ascii, but do you know how to get
a exact covariance value for each atom?
How do you mean "exact", and in what format?
Ma
Dear users,
I am working with PTP1B protein. Recently I tried to run it in
gromacs along with an inhibitor {[7-(DIFLUORO-PHOSPHONO-METHYL)-NAPHTHALEN-
2-YL]-DIFLUORO-METHYL}-PHOSPHONIC ACID[FNP in short]. The problem is that
gromacs does not recognize FNP and hence I am no
tangxuan wrote:
Mark Abraham wrote:
tangxuan wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I have another question. I can get the
coordinates covariance by option -ascii, but do you know how to get a
exact covariance value for each atom?
How do you mean "exact", and in what format?
Mark
__
Ramya Cherukupalli wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to simulate a mutant lipase molecule using OPLS AA
forcefield. In the crystal structure study, presence of a Pi-stacking
interaction has been proposed to help in enhancement of thermostable
behavior of the mutant.
I wanted to clarify 2 things.
Dear all,
I am trying to simulate a mutant lipase molecule using OPLS AA
forcefield. In the crystal structure study, presence of a Pi-stacking
interaction has been proposed to help in enhancement of thermostable
behavior of the mutant.
I wanted to clarify 2 things..
1. Does OPLS AA paramete
Mark Abraham wrote:
tangxuan wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I have another question. I can get the
coordinates covariance by option -ascii, but do you know how to get a
exact covariance value for each atom?
How do you mean "exact", and in what format?
Mark
___
33 matches
Mail list logo