[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with the compilation of GROMACS on a Mac Pro (OS X).
It's a machine with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon, so 8 nodes in all. As
compiler I used the programs delivered with the Xcode tools 3.0 and for
parallelisation the LAM/MPI package delivered with
Dear Rebeca,
I modestly build a program based on antechamber and inspired mostly by
amb2gmx.pl:
http://code.google.com/p/acpypi/
I hope it can be a bit easier to use. You should also take a look in
the tutorials I put there, because the may give you an idea why you
are facing problems (I
Dear Rebeca,
I modestly build a program based on antechamber and inspired mostly by
amb2gmx.pl:
http://code.google.com/p/acpypi/
I hope it can be a bit easier to use. You should also take a look in
the tutorials I put there, because the may give you an idea why you
are facing problems (I
xi zhao wrote:
Dear users:
I want to analyze the EDS (essential dynamics sampling ) results
(sam.edo file),though the website and manual both show that parse_edo
can do it, I do not know how to get it,because I can not find it in
the website. Please help me!
I don't seem to have a
sunita gupta wrote:
Hello
I have a query that how to do PCA which further includes *plotting the
displacement of each C-alpha along first eigenvector having largest
eigenvalue*. I read in many articles that this can be done using
gromacs. I did my MD simutaion using charmm forcefield and
Hi Prasun,
As a side-note to the replies of Justin and Florian, why not take the
following approach?:
1. run pdb2gmx on the monomer, giving structure and topology for one unit
(2. energy minimize in vacuum)
3. use editconf to make a transformed copy of the monomer
-- now, you know for sure that
Hi,
A displacement is not a fluctuation. Displacement is also relational,
so you'll have to specify with respect to what. Likely you'd interpret
displacement with respect to the mean structure, which by definition
is at zero on a given principl axis. But in that case, the
displacement is more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roll back to gcc 3.x.
There is information available that says something like don't use gcc
4.x, it is broken, but I stand by my previous comments that it is
unfortunate that it is up to the end user to search the gromacs archives
to find this out, not withstanding
Hi
I am doing 5 peptide simulation.
1. First i am defining a box using editconf
editconf -f 1st.gro -o box1.gro -bt cubic -box 6 -d 1.1
then for inserting the next peptide i am using genbox
genbox -cp box1.gro -ci 2nd.gro -nmol 1 -o box2.gro -seed 24 -try 100
and same for the subsequent 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am doing 5 peptide simulation.
1. First i am defining a box using editconf
editconf -f 1st.gro -o box1.gro -bt cubic -box 6 -d 1.1
then for inserting the next peptide i am using genbox
genbox -cp box1.gro -ci 2nd.gro -nmol 1 -o box2.gro -seed 24 -try 100
and
David van der Spoel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roll back to gcc 3.x.
There is information available that says something like don't use gcc
4.x, it is broken, but I stand by my previous comments that it is
unfortunate that it is up to the end user to search the gromacs
archives to
minnale wrote:
Thanks to Justin for his suggestion
I tried the way mentioned in http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/make_ndx.
I made index file with seperate groups and feed to g_order command
g_order -f .xtc -s .tpr -od scd.xvg -o ord -n .ndx
Group0 (C34) has 128 elements
Dear all,
I performed essential dynamics analysis on two proteins at
different temperatures ranging from 300 K to 473 K; subsequently I tried to
calculate RMSIP (root mean square inner product) to determine the subspace
overlap between two different trajectories at different
Yes, I never managed to get a later version of g_order to function properly. I
only ever get the -Sg and -Sk outputs, no matter WHAT I put in the index
files. I've just kept an old version of gromacs on the machine I use for
analysis. A copy of 3.2.1 should be quite easy to download, and
Alan Dodd wrote:
Yes, I never managed to get a later version of g_order to function properly. I
only ever get the -Sg and -Sk outputs, no matter WHAT I put in the index files.
I've just kept an old version of gromacs on the machine I use for analysis. A
copy of 3.2.1 should be quite easy
1. First i am defining a box using editconf
editconf -f 1st.gro -o box1.gro -bt cubic -box 6 -d 1.1
then for inserting the next peptide i am using genbox
genbox -cp box1.gro -ci 2nd.gro -nmol 1 -o box2.gro -seed 24 -try 100
and same for the subsequent 3 peptides.
So in this way when i am
This type of notification is a good idea, although I would suggest a
few things.
- Find a way to make this message visible to people who script their
installation and redirect their output to log files. For example, if I
get executable binaries and I can't find the word error or warning in
Thanks Justin for your promt reply, whatever you told is correct, with same
.xtc , .tpr , .ndx files I have used in gromacs version 3.3 It is working.
Thanks alot once again.
minnale wrote:
Thanks to Justin for his suggestion
I tried the way mentioned in
I did actually run the test set on an earlier installation of gromacs on
this computer and I just ran it again to see what the output would be.
The only error I receive is in the dec+water files, which is described
in the wiki as 'unimportant' (I did check the #s and they are similar to
what
David Chan wrote:
I did actually run the test set on an earlier installation of gromacs on
this computer and I just ran it again to see what the output would be.
The only error I receive is in the dec+water files, which is described
in the wiki as 'unimportant' (I did check the #s and they are
I am reinstalling now - hopefully everything will work after that!
Please do let this list know how it works out, either way, and even if
you do submit a bugzilla (which would also be great). I am quite
interested to know what you find.
Chris.
-- Forwarded message --
From: sunita gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:12 PM
Subject: plotting the displacement of each C-alpha along first
eigenvector having largest eigenvalue
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I have done 15 ns MD to study the effect of point
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:47 AM, David van der Spoel [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roll back to gcc 3.x.
There is information available that says something like don't use gcc
4.x, it is broken, but I stand by my previous comments that it is
unfortunate that it is up to
Roland Schulz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:47 AM, David van der Spoel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roll back to gcc 3.x.
There is information available that says something like don't
use
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:48 PM, David van der Spoel [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Roland Schulz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:47 AM, David van der Spoel [EMAIL
PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roll back to gcc 3.x.
Hello once again
As per the suggestions, I went ahead and installed an older version of the
gcc compiler: version 3.4.
I then re-installed fftw and gromacs3.3.3 using the following commands:
./configure --enable-float --enable-threads --enable-sse
--prefix=/home/david/fftw-gcc3
Hi
I've converted the OPLS-AA torsional potential parameters for the
alkane C-C-C-C (CT-CT-CT-CT in the gromacs parameter file notation),
C-C-C-H (CT-CT-CT-HC), and H-C-C-H (HC-CT-CT-HC) torsions from the
OPLS format given in Jorgensen et al, JACS 118, 11225 (1996) (which
are identical to those
in my previous post, for the values of the Ryckaert-Bellemans
parameters (in kJ/mol) that i calculated
dihedral C0 C1 C2 C3
C-C-C-C3.56686 -1.889076 1.313776 -2.33467
should be:
dihedral C0 C1 C2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello once again
As per the suggestions, I went ahead and installed an older version of the
gcc compiler: version 3.4.
I then re-installed fftw and gromacs3.3.3 using the following commands:
./configure --enable-float --enable-threads --enable-sse
29 matches
Mail list logo