maryam zargarzadeh wrote:
I would like to know if I can install gromax on vista and the procedure.
Start by searching the GROMACS webpage.
Mark
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
subarna thakur wrote:
I am doing the energy minimization of a protein using the following
keywords in em.mdp file-
cpp = /usr/bin/cpp
define = -DFLEX_SPC
constraints = none
integrator = steep
nsteps = 3000
;
;Energy minimizing
On Dec 9, 2009, at 11:21 PM, César Ávila wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to simulate a DPPC membrane in gel phase using Martini
Force Field. As stated on
Simulation of gel phase formation and melting in lipid bilayers
using a coarse grained model, CPL 135 (2005) 223-244
the correct 30º
Hello
Can increase the emtol from 1000 to 1 KJ mol - 1 nm-1?
subarna
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Thu, 10 December, 2009 2:33:23 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] energy minimization
Dear Users of Groamcs:
ON the abasis of ED analysis, how to plot free energy landscape and exact
corresponding conformation?
Thank you very much!
___
好玩贺卡等你发,邮箱贺卡全新上线!
http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/--
gmx-users mailing list
On 12/10/09 11:11 AM, xi zhao wrote:
4
http://cn.webmessenger.yahoo.com/index.php?t=1to=eWlkPXpoYW94aWl0YzIwMDI-sig=703fa929658518b2720b087c59cd85f2dabf8844Dear
Users of Groamcs:
ON the abasis of ED analysis, how to plot free energy landscape and
exact corresponding conformation?
subarna thakur wrote:
Hello
Can increase the emtol from 1000 to 1 KJ mol ^- 1 nm^-1?
I wouldn't recommend it. That would be a really large maximum force, which
would probably cause your system to be very unstable. Look at your original
structure to see what might be wrong instead of
Thanks for the help.
On 12/09/2009 05:57 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Simone Pellegrini wrote:
Dear all,
I am researching optimization for MPI parallel programs.
As I saw Gromacs seems to use MPI and my idea is to test some of the
program transformations I am aware of to improve the performance.
Mahendran E wrote:
hi all
while running gromacs in parallel environment
i am getting the following command,
the command i used is
mpirun -np 5 -machinefile machinefile /usr/local/gromacs/bin/mdrun_mpi
-s fws_md.tpr -o fws_md.trr -c fws_pmd.pdb -g md.log -e md.edr
error:
Program
Mahendran E ha scritto:
hi all
while running gromacs in parallel environment
i am getting the following command,
the command i used is
mpirun -np 5 -machinefile machinefile /usr/local/gromacs/bin/mdrun_mpi -s
fws_md.tpr -o fws_md.trr -c fws_pmd.pdb -g md.log -e md.edr
error:
hi all
while running gromacs in parallel environment
*mpirun -np 3* -machinefile machinefile /usr/local/gromacs/bin/mdrun_mpi -s
fws_md.tpr -o fws_md.trr -c fws_pmd.pdb -g md.log -e md.edr
*for mpirun 3 nodes i got the output,*
while trying to increase the nodes to 5 or 8 i am getting the
Mahendran E wrote:
hi all
while running gromacs in parallel environment
*mpirun -np 3* -machinefile machinefile /usr/local/gromacs/bin/mdrun_mpi
-s fws_md.tpr -o fws_md.trr -c fws_pmd.pdb -g md.log -e md.edr
*for mpirun 3 nodes i got the output,*
while trying to increase the nodes to
Dear All:
I am doing umbrella sampling to calculate energy profile of an drug
passing through a ion channel by GROMACS3.3.
In order to get right result, I need to choose a reasonable force
constant in my simulation, right? I know that, a reasonable force
constant should produce enough
I am doing umbrella sampling to calculate energy profile of an drug
passing through a ion channel by GROMACS3.3.
why not gmx 4?
In order to get right result, I need to choose a reasonable force
constant in my simulation, right? I know that, a reasonable force
constant should produce
Hi all,
I am trying to do velocity auto-correlation function(VACF) for the
'oxygen atom' present in a 63 Ang. cubic water box, simulated upto 500ps.
And the velocities are stored at every 5fs. While doing the
analysis(g_velacc), it got struck at 400ps, since if felt it is mainly due
to the
Hi Justin,
Sorry about the email. I just made a mistake while posting.
First of all, Thanks for replying.
I tried the suggestions you gave like I changed the pbc from full to xyz,
removed -Dflex term and also changed the fourier grid spacing but still I am
getting the same error. I am attaching
Dallas B. Warren wrote:
Thanks Mark.
My stats on this, GROMACS 4.0.7 compiled with gcc, run on two quad-core Xeon
processors with 16GB of RAM, 100,000 atoms, PME, 200,000 steps
fftw 3.2.1 - 20,027 seconds
Intel cmkl - 19,792 seconds
So about 1.2% faster.
IIRC icc does a better job on mkl
Hello,
Does anyone have additional details about how the calculations are done for
the -mol flag of g_msd when using -rmcomm? I am comparing results with and
without the -mol flag. I presume that when -mol is used the file specified
by the -o flag contains the average msd of the centers of mass
shivkumar bale wrote:
Hi Justin,
Sorry about the email. I just made a mistake while posting.
First of all, Thanks for replying.
I tried the suggestions you gave like I changed the pbc from full to
xyz, removed -Dflex term and also changed the fourier grid spacing but
still I am getting
Hi Justin,
Thanks for replying.
No .log file is produced. Can you elaborate what do you mean by ' this
really sounds more like a job for your sysadmin '. What should I exactly do
to rectify this error? I am new to super computers and gromacs.
Regards
Shivkumar
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:59 PM,
shivkumar bale wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for replying.
No .log file is produced. Can you elaborate what do you mean by ' this
really sounds more like a job for your sysadmin '. What should I exactly
do to rectify this error? I am new to super computers and gromacs.
If no output is
3D-FFT under both situations is 21.4% and PME mesh down as 54% (figures taken
from the second last and last tables in the .log file, respectively).
Catch ya,
Dr Dallas Warren
Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Monash University
A polar bear is a Cartesian bear that has undergone a polar
Dear gromacs users:
Can any one tell me how can i split a trajectory file from a
specific time interval of my interest.
For example if i have a trajectory file up to 0-100ps, and my interest is to
consider part of the trajectory from 50-75ps,
how i can go about it either by splitting the
Ramachandran G wrote:
Dear gromacs users:
Can any one tell me how can i split a trajectory file from a
specific time interval of my interest.
For example if i have a trajectory file up to 0-100ps, and my interest
is to consider part of the trajectory from 50-75ps,
how i can go about
Another option is to create a new trajectory file to use in your analysis,
using trjconv
Catch ya,
Dr Dallas Warren
Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Monash University
A polar bear is a Cartesian bear that has undergone a polar transformation
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks for your help.
I have tried the command
trjconv -f traj.trr -s AFP-500ps.tpr -b 87001 -e 99000 -o test.gro
but nothing was written on output file(test.gro) and got the message
WARNING no output, trajectory ended at 500
Am i doing it right?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Justin A.
Ramachandran G wrote:
Thanks for your help.
I have tried the command
trjconv -f traj.trr -s AFP-500ps.tpr -b 87001 -e 99000 -o test.gro
but nothing was written on output file(test.gro) and got the message
WARNING no output, trajectory ended at 500
Am i doing it right?
Obviously not.
27 matches
Mail list logo