Hi Hassan,
If you have an index file with all the groups, you can use something like:
#!/bin/bash
groups=`grep ^\[ index.ndx | wc -l`
for ((i=0; i$groups; i++))
do
echo $((i++)) $i | g_dist ...
done
This will take groups 0 and 1, 2 and 3, etc, passing the selections to
g_dist. If you want
Hi,
Our philosophy up till now is that with bond constraints and hydrogens
replaced by virtual sites one can reach a time step of 4 or 5
femtoseconds. This is roughly equal to the largest time step, used for
the PME mesh part, in multiple time stepping. But we then do less
work on the non-bonded
Hi Vijaya,
could it be that you mixed something up when making the .edi file?
The tool make_edi reads the total number of atoms from the provided
.tpr file and saves this number with the other ED sampling
information to the .edi file.
The ED sampling module in mdrun then compares the number
Dear all,
I'm running my first simulation of a dimer.
When I run g_rms on Calpha (lsq fit and RMSD calculation on Calpha) to get
the RMSD of the whole dimer, the graph is ascending, till reaching a value
of 8 A.
in this case, I take a .tpr file, a .xtc file and a .ndx file of the whole
dimer.
On Jun 30, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Carla Jamous wrote:
Dear all,
I'm running my first simulation of a dimer.
When I run g_rms on Calpha (lsq fit and RMSD calculation on Calpha)
to get the RMSD of the whole dimer, the graph is ascending, till
reaching a value of 8 A.
in this case, I take a .tpr
Hi gromacs users
I want to know what is purpose of -dt flag in most of commands? in my
analysis, different values for -dt
results in outcomes have not determined trend .
I used this flag for g_rms as follows :
if g_rms -f pr.xtc -s pr.tpr -n pr.ndx-o 5.xvg -dt 5 so :
gromacs record
Dear Vitaly Chaban
yes. my md simulation is equilibrioum.
I did simulation of protein-dna. I want to know how protein and dna close
together and interact together (approach of protein to major groove of dna).
thanks alot in advance.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
Hi,
In the mathematical sense, gromacs will only use the frames in the
trajectory for which time modulus dt equals 0 (time % dt == 0).
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:47 AM, XAvier Periole x.peri...@rug.nl wrote:
-dt will define the frequency of analysis that a program will do.
In
Hi all,
I want to reproduce some experimental data on Spectroscopy using
Gromacs. I want to know is it possible? If yes, how to do that? Is there
any tutorial related to that?
Any help is appreciate!
regards,
Baofu Qiao
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
Hi,
I am using MPICH2 library for gromacs.
Thanks and Regards
Syed Tarique Moin
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post
Baofu Qiao wrote:
Hi all,
I want to reproduce some experimental data on Spectroscopy using
Gromacs. I want to know is it possible? If yes, how to do that? Is there
any tutorial related to that?
Any help is appreciate!
Your question is too vague to get much useful advice. The term
Dear Vitaly Chaban
yes. my md simulation is equilibrioum.
I did simulation of protein-dna. I want to know how protein and dna close
together and interact together (approach of protein to major groove of dna).
thanks alot in advance.
Dear leila,
Please look towards g_rmsdist utility of
Dear Vitaly Chaban
yes. my md simulation is equilibrioum.
I did simulation of protein-dna. I want to know how protein and dna close
together and interact together (approach of protein to major groove of dna).
thanks alot in advance.
Dear leila,
Please look towards g_rmsdist utility of
XAvier Periole skrev:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Carla Jamous wrote:
Dear all,
I'm running my first simulation of a dimer.
When I run g_rms on Calpha (lsq fit and RMSD calculation on Calpha)
to get the RMSD of the whole dimer, the graph is ascending, till
reaching a value of 8 A.
in
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your reply! And sorry for the vague question due to my little
knowledge on the spectroscopy.
What I want to reproduce is wavenumber of C-H vibrations in alkyl
chains. In NMR experiments, such wavenumber is measured to be 2000-3000
cm-1, namely in the middle region of infra
Hi all
I used [ g_rama -f *.xtc -s *.tpr -o rama.xvg ] command for analysis of
protein. gromacs give me rama.xvg as output but during calculation :
Found 68 phi-psi combinations
Dihedral around 9,11 not found in topology. Using mult=3
Dihedral around 11,18 not found in topology. Using mult=3
I think this is not a problem of Gromacs, but the cluster you are using.
Try to contact with your cluster administrator, and check the
administration software.
Syed Tarique Moin wrote:
Hi,
I am using MPICH2 library for gromacs.
Thanks and Regards
Syed Tarique Moin
--
Hi all
pdb file for my protein was obtained by solution NMR. this file is as
follows :
ATOM 1 N GLY A 1 -25.349 -8.577 4.055 1.00 0.00
ATOM 2 CA GLY A 1 -24.037 -8.099 4.448 1.00 0.00
ATOM 3 C GLY A 1 -23.580 -6.913 3.622 1.00 0.00
ATOM
leila karami skrev:
Hi all
pdb file for my protein was obtained by solution NMR. this file is as
follows :
ATOM 1 N GLY A 1 -25.349 -8.577 4.055 1.00 0.00
ATOM 2 CA GLY A 1 -24.037 -8.099 4.448 1.00 0.00
ATOM 3 C GLY A 1 -23.580 -6.913
Hi all,
I'm using ffamber99p ff in gromacs and now I have to use
some additional parameters in the force field. Regarding to designation
of proper dihedrals in AMBER, in some cases there are 2 or 3 dihedrals
given for a specific torsion, in which parameters(e.g. angles) differ
from each other
?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20100630/aa154dfa/attachment.html
--
--
gmx-users mailing list
gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman
On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Erik Marklund wrote:
XAvier Periole skrev:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Carla Jamous wrote:
Dear all,
I'm running my first simulation of a dimer.
When I run g_rms on Calpha (lsq fit and RMSD calculation on
Calpha) to get the RMSD of the whole dimer, the
Hi Shahab,
I used [ g_rama -f *.xtc -s *.tpr -o rama.xvg ] command for analysis of
Was that your actual command line? If you used a .tpr, why didn't it
have all the dihedrals defined then? How did you get it? Anyway, you
should be able to assert that the dihedrals mentioned are in fact your
Hi,
Not necessary!
If the dimer separates across the boundaries you have
a problem of fitting the two together while they are separated.
This is only if you use the dimer. The monomers would be fine.
That was the case before gromacs 4. But the current versions don't
keep molecules whole.
Dear All,
I had posted here a week or so ago, but fixed my problem, and wanted to post
it, and ask if somone has a better method for this:
Basically, I have 5 different proteins A-E in a pdb file.
I can generate a toplogy initially with pdb2gmx automated, which places the NH3
and COO-
Thank you for all your replies. Actually, I have already applied trjconv
-pbc. So I'm sure that my analysis is on a whole protein, centered in my
box. I'm using gromacs 4.0.3
So I think that you were right by saying that my dimer is not stable while
my monomers are. But now, I have to fgure out
Dear Tsjerk Wassenaar
thanks for your attentions.
ok. [ g_rama -f *.xtc -s *.tpr -o rama.xvg ] is my actual command line.
I get tpr file by command :
grompp -f *.mdp -c *.gro -p *.top -n *.ndx -o *.tpr
where I should put multiplicity of 3 (what file) ?
-- shahab
--
gmx-users
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 13:07 +0200, Erik Marklund wrote:
leila karami skrev:
Hi all
pdb file for my protein was obtained by solution NMR. this file is as
follows :
ATOM 1 N GLY A 1 -25.349 -8.577 4.055 1.00 0.00
ATOM 2 CA GLY A 1 -24.037 -8.099
Hi Shahab,
The dihedral definitions should be in the .top file. But you don't
give any clue to what you've done or what you're doing, so there's
nothing more for us to say to try and help you.
ok. [ g_rama -f *.xtc -s *.tpr -o rama.xvg ] is my actual command line.
So you're actually using
Hi
how to obtain residence time of water molecule using md simulation and
gromacs?
What is the best way to do this? Please suggest.
-- atila
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
MPICH is known to have problems with GROMACS under at least some circumstances.
Try OpenMPI
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Syed Tarique Moin taris...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 22:36
Subject: [gmx-users] the job is not being distributed
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
hi, all
Finally figured out that it was because all numbers in the cmap.itp
file must be separated by only one space,otherwise the program will
read in a zero. I would suggest this to be fixed in the release
version.
have a nice day.
dawei
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Da-Wei Li
- Original Message -
From: lloyd riggs lloyd.ri...@gmx.ch
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 21:55
Subject: [gmx-users] Re:Chain terminus
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Dear All,
I had posted here a week or so ago, but fixed my problem, and
wanted to post it, and ask if somone has a
- Original Message -
From: Baofu Qiao qia...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 20:57
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] question about Gromacs and Spectroscopy
To: jalem...@vt.edu, Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your reply! And sorry for
Hi,
Thanks a lot, i will try openmpi.
Regards
Syed Tarique Moin
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests
Hi all
I am commencing the initial stages for he calculation of potential of
mean force of bringing together two cage molecules. I am following the
tutorial in such an exercise at
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/umbrella/05_pull.html
In contrast to the
Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Hi all
I am commencing the initial stages for he calculation of potential of
mean force of bringing together two cage molecules. I am following the
tutorial in such an exercise at
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/umbrella/05_pull.html
Dear Gromacs users,
I need to determine electric potential on each atom, and I know that APBS
has such function. I wanted to first minimize the energies through gromacs
and then use the apbs to do the electrostatic calculations. Can you please
tell me what file do I need to convert to pqr after
Hi Justin
Thanks. If I use the pull_geometry = direction I would go for the
following jus t to pull the molecules together in the z direction.
pull= umbrella
pull_geometry = direction
pull_start = yes
pull_ngroups = 1
pull_group0 = cage_1
pull_group1 = cage_2
pull_vec1 = 0.0 0.0 -1.0
Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Hi Justin
Thanks. If I use the pull_geometry = direction I would go for the
following jus t to pull the molecules together in the z direction.
pull= umbrella
pull_geometry = direction
pull_start = yes
pull_ngroups = 1
pull_group0 = cage_1
pull_group1 = cage_2
Hello,
I have successfully compiled gromacs with openmpi but i see the same problem
that the jobs is still not distributed to other nodes but showing all the
processor in node and it should be distributed.
Thanks and regards
Syed Tarique Moin
--
gmx-users mailing list
Hello Gromacs users,
I've been doing some simple NVT simulations of Lennard-Jones particles using
the built-in 12-6 potential and a tabulated version (vdwtype=user) of this
same potential. Both give practically identical results for the density and
pressure, but differ in the chemical potential
*I read thorough the manual on index groups and creating index file. This is
the command I tried:
make_ndx -f index.gro -o index.ndx
*
with index.gro you proposed:
[ special ]
1 3
[ all ]
1 2 3 4
error I get:
Reading structure file
Moeed wrote:
*I read thorough the manual on index groups and creating index file.
This is the command I tried:
make_ndx -f index.gro -o index.ndx
*
with index.gro you proposed:
I posted an index file suitable for use as is. It is not a .gro file. I
created the index file using a simple
I have a .gro file and I am trying to convert is to a .top file using x2top.
The
.gro file is as follows:
Octyl Beta Glucoside
48
1OBG O1 2.840 2.397 2.515
1OBG C2 2.938 2.408 2.468
1OBG H3 2.946 2.418 2.356
1OBG C4
Hi
I am trying to follow the tutorial listed on
http://eugen.leitl.org/chem/kerrigje/pdf_files/fwspidr_tutor.pdf with
the latest version of Gromacs, 4.0.7
The commands I typed were
pdb2gmx ignh ff G43a1 f 1OMB.pdb o fws.gro p fws.top
editconf f fws.gro d 0.7
editconf f out.gro o
Amanda Watkins wrote:
I have a .gro file and I am trying to convert is to a .top file using
x2top. The .gro file is as follows:
Octyl Beta Glucoside
48
1OBG O1 2.840 2.397 2.515
1OBG C2 2.938 2.408 2.468
1OBG H3 2.946 2.418 2.356
Nayef Daher wrote:
Hi
I am trying to follow the tutorial listed on
http://eugen.leitl.org/chem/kerrigje/pdf_files/fwspidr_tutor.pdf with
the latest version of Gromacs, 4.0.7
The commands I typed were
pdb2gmx –ignh –ff G43a1 –f 1OMB.pdb –o fws.gro –p fws.top
editconf –f fws.gro –d 0.7
Amanda,
X2TOP is a somewhat enigmatic tool. You are never sure when it why it
works or refuses to generate a topology...
Try to start with PDB file instead of GRO. Try to use -pbc keyword.
Try to add new lines to N2T database corresponding to all atoms of
your molecule.
Good luck,
Vitaly
I
Vitaly Chaban wrote:
Amanda,
X2TOP is a somewhat enigmatic tool. You are never sure when it why it
works or refuses to generate a topology...
Try to start with PDB file instead of GRO. Try to use -pbc keyword.
Try to add new lines to N2T database corresponding to all atoms of
your molecule.
Yes, yes... I mixed them up again... One should try that option which
is not default.
Vitaly Chaban wrote:
Amanda,
X2TOP is a somewhat enigmatic tool. You are never sure when it why it
works or refuses to generate a topology...
Try to start with PDB file instead of GRO. Try to use -pbc
Hi Nayef,
grompp –f em.mdp –c fws_b4em.gro –p fws.top –o fws_em.tpr
genion –s fws_em.tpr –o fws_ion.gro –nname CL- –nn 2 –g fws_ion.log
[select Group 12: SOL]
pico fws.top [reduce number of SOL by two and add 2 CL- at the end of the
file]
This is all fine. You take the structure before em,
Hi Syed,
you have to give more information for other people to be able to
understand what you are doing. What is the exact sequence of
commands you use to start the mdrun job? How does your
OpenMPI hostfile look like, how are your nodes called, what does
mdrun print on the first lines. Without
Hi Nayef,
the next may be useful from technical point of view.
if you add the option -p with topology file as an argument to given genion
options you don't have to edit the topology file by hand.
for example
genion –s fws_em.tpr –o fws_ion.gro –nname CL- –nn 2 –g fws_ion.log -p
fws.top -pname
Hi Vladimir,
In [1] there is a option, called Prometheus which allows you to create pqr
files from pdb file. Please, see in tools options.
I would like to suggest you try to use Prometheus and tell me if it works
fine.
[1] http://glu.fcfrp.usp.br:8180/prometheus/
Thanks in advance,
--
Rodrigo
In addition to what everyone else has said, please note that pull_dim
= N N Y is going to allow X and Y distance components to get as
large/small as they will without any restraint. This may be what you
want, but if you want a distance, but want it to be mostly in Z, then
pull_dim = Y Y Y
Hi Justin
I manually modified the fws.top by removing two SOL and adding 2 CL-
and that still didn't work.
Adding -p flag gave me another type of error, stating that
input/output is wrong. I entered the genion command as such
genion s fws_em.tpr o fws_ion.gro -p fws.top nname CL- nn
Hi,
1) What capping residues are recognized by charmm implemented on gromacs in
the latest git version?
I was trying to use ACE for acetyl but it is not recognized by pdb2gmx.
2) Is it possible to define caps at residues other than those at the
termini?
Regards
Pooja
--
Quaerendo
Sai Pooja wrote:
Hi,
1) What capping residues are recognized by charmm implemented on gromacs
in the latest git version?
It looks like there aren't any. Check the .rtp file to be sure.
I was trying to use ACE for acetyl but it is not recognized by pdb2gmx.
2) Is it possible to define
Nayef Daher wrote:
Hi Justin
I manually modified the fws.top by removing two SOL and adding 2 CL- and
that still didn't work.
Adding -p flag gave me another type of error, stating that input/output
is wrong. I entered the genion command as such
The actual error message is the only
- Original Message -
From: Vladimir Lankevich vladimir.lankev...@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010 2:39
Subject: [gmx-users] Gromacs to APBS
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Dear Gromacs users, I need to determine electric potential on each
atom, and I know that APBS has such
- Original Message -
From: Syed Tarique Moin taris...@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010 4:22
Subject: [gmx-users] the job is not being distributed
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
---
| Hello,
I have successfully compiled gromacs
- Original Message -
From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010 9:58
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Capping residues
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sai Pooja wrote:
Hi,
1) What capping residues are recognized by charmm implemented
Hi gromacs users:
Using amber/charmm force field we simulated a solvated protein system
at different temperature(300,250 and 200K).
I used TIP5P water model and applied NVT ensemble . We analyzed the hydrogen
bond life time correlation function(HBCF) to study the protein water
interactions.
Hello All,
I have done simulation for 1ns on a protein dimer using GROMOS96 43a1 force
field.
I want to study if the protein is stable as a dimer or not, so can you please
give me some suggestion as to what analysis I could do for the same.
I checked g_rms after the simulation, graph which I
65 matches
Mail list logo