Hi,
I have incorporated some metal binding sites(zinc ion) in my protein. Now I
want to see whether that region binds to zinc ions or not and what is the
effect of ion binding to the topology of the protein .. Can this be done
using gromacs and how ??
Regards
--
Bharat
Ph.D. Candidate
Room No.
Hi,
"3000 water molecule per lipids per second" corresponds to 0.000384 water
molecules transferred across the membrane per nano second (assume the system
contains 128 lipids). It seems water translocation should not be observed in a
simulation of 10 ns, but I am not sure. And I only find one r
Moeed wrote:
Hello,
I tried to follow the FE tutorials and get my own system working but it
seems I am missing something coz I get a blank dgdl file. log file is
saying:
There are 0 atoms and 0 charges for free energy perturbation
Removing pbc first time
What I do is runnin
Hello,
I tried to follow the FE tutorials and get my own system working but it
seems I am missing something coz I get a blank dgdl file. log file is
saying:
There are 0 atoms and 0 charges for free energy perturbation
Removing pbc first time
What I do is running EM (lambda 0) on a solvated syst
Dear Aldo,
It is totally OK to see water molecules within the bilayer, both in
simulations and real life. If I am not totally wrong, 3000 water
molecule per lipids per second are being transferred across the bilayer
without any protein involvement.
If your system is stable, the lipids densit
Justin Kat wrote:
Dear Gromacs,
My colleague has attempted to issue this command:
mpirun -np 8 (or 7) mdrun_mpi .. (etc)
According to him, he gets the following error message:
MPI_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 in communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
with errorcode -1.
NOTE: invoking
Dear Gromacs,
My colleague has attempted to issue this command:
mpirun -np 8 (or 7) mdrun_mpi .. (etc)
According to him, he gets the following error message:
MPI_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 in communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
with errorcode -1.
NOTE: invoking MPI_ABORT causes Open MPI to kil
Hi,
That suggets it's related to the new merge-on-the-fly-code and not the
pbc handling.
And it's me, not Justin, who's fixing and probably creating the bugs. :-)
Cheers,
Erik
Zuzana Benkova skrev 2011-02-16 19.58:
Dear Justin,
maybe following information helps you. When I evaluated the n
Hello,
I got your files. However, the error is completely another than you
mention and it occurs directly at the first time-step of the
simulation.
Inner product between old and new vector <= 0.0!
constraint #1 atoms 1377 and 1381
Wrote pdb files with
Dear Justin, maybe following information helps you. When I evaluated the number of hydrogen bonds between two different groups, particularly, water and frozen atoms of the siloxane surface I got the same results with both version of GROMACS, 4.0.3 and 4.5.2.GreetingsZuzanaOn 02/15/11, Zuzana Benkov
Aldo Segura wrote:
Dear gmx-users,
I completed a MD (10 ns) of my protein-membrane system. When I perform a
visual inspection (VMD) of md_0_1.gro file I observed a few water
molecules within the bilayer. In previous steps (e.g. equilibration)
this was not observed. Could be expected such beh
Dear
gmx-users,
I
completed a MD (10 ns) of my protein-membrane system. When I perform a visual
inspection
(VMD) of md_0_1.gro file
I
observed a few water molecules within the
bilayer. In previous steps (e.g. equilibration) this was not observed. Could be
expected such behavior?
Best regards
Thank you very much for the clarification!
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:46:18 +0100
From: Tsjerk Wassenaar
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] g_rmsf reference structure?
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
The reference i
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20110216/8495d798/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:43:56 +0100
From: Tsjerk Wassenaar
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Periodic Boundary Conditions g_mindist -pi
To: Discussion list for GROMACS
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Ifat
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The output:
>>>>
>>>> 343.7 10.813 5.924 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>>>
>>>> 343.8 10.809 5.949
;>
>>> 345 0.173 21.981 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>>
>>> 345.1 0.191 21.954 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>>
>>> 345.2 0.183 21.958 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>>
>>> 345.3 0.181 22.012 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>>
>>&g
.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.4 0.17 22.054 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.5 0.168 22.054 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.6 0.189 22.039 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.7 0.171 22.007 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.8 0.186
On 16/02/2011 11:24 PM, oguz gurbulak wrote:
/Dear All/,
I want to generate some initial crystalline structures of my
targetmolecules for md simulations. /Are there any free softwares/ to
do this?
Some sources for obtaining initial coordinates can be found here
http://www.gromacs.org/Doc
45 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.6 0.189 22.039 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.7 0.171 22.007 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.8 0.186 22.031 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 345.9 0.171 22.077 16.445 16.445 16.445
>>
>> 346
Dear All,
I want to generate some initial crystalline structures of
my target molecules for md simulations. Are there any free softwares to do this?
And are there any complete sources that give the
theoretical structures of organic molecules ( like hydrocarbons ) determined by
the exper
6.445 16.445 16.445
347 10.762 5.999 16.445 16.445 16.445
347.1 10.781 5.984 16.445 16.445 16.445
347.2 10.784 6.002 16.445 16.445 16.445
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gm
45
>
> 346.6 10.813 5.996 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.7 10.781 6.006 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.8 10.793 6.026 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 346.9 10.745 5.985 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 347 10.762 5.999 16.445 16.445 16.445
>
> 347.1 10.781
Hi there!
We are trying to compile gromacs with Gaussian 03 rev D.02 (we also
have g09). We followed the instructions in
http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~ggroenh/roadmap.pdf despite that they do no
fit exactly with the g03 rev d03 version,for instance, FrcNCN is no
in l710 but in utilam.F
Despite of that
Hi,
The reference is used for fitting. The RMSF is calculated with respect
to the average (fitted) structure, unless you explicitly specify that
deviations from the reference should be used.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> On 16/02/2011 3:44 PM, kulleperum
Hi Ifat,
I guess this is a jump over the periodic boundaries. You should remove
jumps from the trajectory (-pbc nojump) before running g_mindist -pi.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, ifat shub wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am running a simulation on the complex 1aik.pdb in 310K. I wan
Hi,
I am running a simulation on the complex 1aik.pdb in 310K. I wanted to see
if the complex is seeing its next periodic image, so I used the g_mindist
command with the -pi option. My command line was:
g_mindist -f run.xtc -s run.gro -n index.ndx -od tmp.xvg -pi
The output (see below) was sta
26 matches
Mail list logo