Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-24 Thread gigo
Dear Mark, Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately, TIP5P is completely rigid and the FLEXIBLE define will not change it. Any other ideas? Best, g On 2013-09-24 23:51, Mark Abraham wrote: You should be able to minimize with CG and TIP5P by eliminating constraints, by making the water use a fle

Re: [gmx-users] ensemble selection

2013-09-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 9/24/13 2:40 PM, fatemeh ramezani wrote: Dear Justin I'm simulating gold nanoparticle interaction with protein by OPLSAA forcefield. I'm confused for selection an ensemble for my md run. I did energy minimization by NPT . then I did the MD by NVT. I did it because of Let's take a step b

Re: [gmx-users] The charge of cofactor and ligand

2013-09-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 9/24/13 7:16 AM, aixintiankong wrote: Dear prof. The format of parameters is convenient to the software of Amber and not to gromacs. if i use the parameters i must use some tools to convert it to the itp format for gromacs. so i use acpype to get itp format. i just doubt th

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Fatal Error: Residue 'DMP' not found in residue topology database

2013-09-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 9/23/13 11:43 PM, Santhosh Kumar Nagarajan wrote: Justin.. I understand the problem.. But.. How to generate a .rtp file myself.. Study existing examples, read manual section 5.6.1, and fire up a text editor. -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul

Re: [gmx-users] SPC with amber?

2013-09-24 Thread Rafael I. Silverman y de la Vega
Ok, thanks, I may just do that On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > The FF+water combinations still work the same way they did 3 years > ago! :-) The important question is whether validation for the > observables has occurred. (And no relevant problems were seen). If the > pape

Re: [gmx-users] SPC with amber?

2013-09-24 Thread Mark Abraham
The FF+water combinations still work the same way they did 3 years ago! :-) The important question is whether validation for the observables has occurred. (And no relevant problems were seen). If the paper does not support its decision to mix and match, go and ask them why it was reasonable! Mark

[gmx-users] SPC with amber?

2013-09-24 Thread Rafael I. Silverman y de la Vega
Dear all, I have been trying to evaluate a paper that used amber99 with SPC water to simulate a protein. How would this affect the results, is it important? I googled for a bit, all I found was: "Amber, charmm and OPLS-AA were developed with TIP3P, and that should be the default. Except that charm

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-24 Thread Mark Abraham
You should be able to minimize with CG and TIP5P by eliminating constraints, by making the water use a flexible molecule, e.g. define = -DFLEXIBLE (or something). Check your water .itp file for how to do it. Mark On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:25 PM, gigo wrote: > Dear GMXers, > Since I am intereste

[gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-24 Thread gigo
Dear GMXers, Since I am interested in interactions of lone electron pairs of water oxygen within the active site of an enzyme that I work on, I decided to give TIP5P a shot. I use OPLSAA. I run into troubles very fast trying to minimize freshly solvated system. I found on the gmx-users (http:/

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding g_sgangle index file

2013-09-24 Thread Teemu Murtola
Hello, On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Venkat Reddy wrote: > I have been using the new tool "gmx gangle". My actual intention is to > calculate the orientation between any two same molecules (say cholesterol) > throughout the trajectory and there are 40 cholesterol molecules. But I > couldn't c

[gmx-users] ensemble selection

2013-09-24 Thread fatemeh ramezani
 Dear Justin I'm simulating gold nanoparticle interaction with protein by OPLSAA forcefield. I'm confused for selection an ensemble for my md run. I did energy minimization by NPT . then I did the MD by NVT. I did it because of studying of two paper that were similar to my project (Adsorption

[gmx-users] walls combining with the PME and pressure coupling

2013-09-24 Thread 彭春望
Dear all, I have sent this e-mail to the gmx-users mailing list for a few days, but without any reply until now. I'm not sure if it has something to do with the format, because the link can’t be opened when I search the mailing list. So this time I use the plain text and send it once more, wou

[gmx-users] Use of walls combining with the PME and pressure coupling (new)

2013-09-24 Thread p . chunwang
 Dear all, I have sent this e-mail to the gmx-users mailing list for a few days, but without any reply until now. I'm not sure if it has something to do with the format, because the link can’t be opened when I search the mailing list. So this time I use the plain text and send it once more, would a

[gmx-users] periodic surface minimization

2013-09-24 Thread escajarro
Dear list members, I am trying to simulate an infinite layer of quartz in Gromacs. Due to my needs (afterwards I need to place a large molecule on top of it) the surface must be at least 12x12 nm^2. I generated the input files from a pdb file of the structure, and adapted the OPLS force field to m

[gmx-users] Re:gmx-users Digest, Vol 113, Issue 108

2013-09-24 Thread aixintiankong
Dear prof. The format of parameters is convenient to the software of Amber and not to gromacs. if i use the parameters i must use some tools to convert it to the itp format for gromacs. so i use acpype to get itp format. i just doubt that i use amber99sb for protein and AM1-BBC for