search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
Arneh Babakhani
McCammon Lab
De
/Erik
>
> 20 sep 2007 kl. 17.18 skrev Arneh Babakhani:
>
>> Great, got it, thanks for the suggestion, appreciate the input,
>>
>> Arneh
>>
>>> Arneh Babakhani wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> When outputting the average structure fro
Great, got it, thanks for the suggestion, appreciate the input,
Arneh
> Arneh Babakhani wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When outputting the average structure from g_rmsf using the -ox option,
>> some of my residues in that average structure pdb have awkward
>> coordinates
Ok, thanks, I figured as much, was wondering if there was an option
perhaps in g_rmsf that would produce a "minimized" average structure . . .
I guess not,
Arneh
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 20. September 2007 16:15, Arneh Babakhani wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When
Hi,
When outputting the average structure from g_rmsf using the -ox option,
some of my residues in that average structure pdb have awkward coordinates
(when you visualize it in VMD, it looks very strange). Sometimes atoms
are placed very close to each other, with really bad bond angles. I
suppos
I see to calculate the average structure of a protein in a trajectory
minus any rotational + translational effects, using g_rmsf. Does the
-fit option (default yes) eliminate rot + trans contributions?
Or must one use trjconv first, to convert the trajectory to some
reference frame eliminati
A = [
x1 0 0
x2 0 0
x3 0 0
y1 0 0
y2 0 0
y3 0 0
z1 0 0
z2 0 0
z3 0 0
0 x1 0
0 x2 0
0 x3 0
0 y1 0
0 y2 0
0 y3 0
0 z1 0
0 z2 0
0 z3 0
0 0 x1
0 0 x2
0 0 x3
0 0 y1
0 0 y2
0 0 y3
0 0 z1
0 0 z2
0 0 z3
];
and
B = [
x1 y1 z1
x2 y2 z2
x3 y3 z3 ]
Arneh
100
> atoms.
>
> Hope it helps,
>
> Tsjerk
>
> On 9/5/07, Arneh Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks Tsjerk,
>>
>> One other question, regarding the covar.dat file (the covariance matrix
>> that's outputted when using the -ascii f
nd paste the output here for us to continue our help?
On 9/6/2007 5:43 AM, Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled a mpi double-precision version of mdrun_d. I'm trying
to use it, but I get the following error. Any ideas what the 'symbol
lookup error' is?
-
Hi,
I've compiled a mpi double-precision version of mdrun_d. I'm trying to
use it, but I get the following error. Any ideas what the 'symbol
lookup error' is?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Window-1]$ mpirun -np 4 mdrun_d -np 4 -s
UmbrellaMD.tpr -o UmbrellaMD -c AfterUmbrellaMD
h,
Yes. As you should be able to recall, the (linear, not "generalized")
correlation is formally given as:
cor(x,y) = cov(x,y) / ( sqrt(var(x))*sqrt(var(y)) )
The diagonal elements of the covariance matrix give the variances...
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On 8/31/07, Arneh Babakhani <[EMAIL P
m_ij
> by sqrt(m_ii)*sqrt(m_jj).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tsjerk
>
> On 8/31/07, Arneh Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can anyone briefly recommend a procedure for calculating the correlation
>> matrix (not the diagonalized covariance matrix, as done by g_co
Yes, I have seen this, had trouble compiling it. Does it matter what
version of gromacs you're trying to compile it with?
> Hi,
>
>
> On Friday, 31. August 2007 05:14, Arneh Babakhani wrote:
>> Can anyone briefly recommend a procedure for calculating the correla
Can anyone briefly recommend a procedure for calculating the correlation
matrix (not the diagonalized covariance matrix, as done by g_covar) of a
specified group?
In particular, I'm looking to calculate the covariance matrix, as specifed
in the Karplus paper (Proteins: Vol 11:205-217, 1991), where
Hi ,
I'd like to use g_covar to calculate the average structure of a
trajectory. But at the moment, I'm not interested in any of the eig.
value/vector data (which takes a considerable amount of time to
calculate).
Was wondering: Is there a way to suppress the eig. value/vector/covar
matrix
>
> Maybe it should be obvious, but (a) why are you constraining two
> distances, and (b) are you sure your constraints aren't going to muck
> with the internal degrees of freedom for the ligand? I would think one
> would like to pull the ligand out of the receptor along some
> particular directio
ensions of the box? (which are 6 6 6). The dimensions
are irrespective of the centering of the box, right?
[I know this seems a little trivial. I'd like to have my molecule
centered at 0 0 0, b/c I'll be collecting coordinates later and it'll just
make my math easier.]
>
using editconf.
> Arneh Babakhani wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using editconf to center my sytem about the origin (0 0 0). No
>> problem there.
>>
>> But then when I use genbox to solvate the resulting structure, the
>> solvent
>> is offset (no
Hi,
I'm using editconf to center my sytem about the origin (0 0 0). No
problem there.
But then when I use genbox to solvate the resulting structure, the solvent
is offset (not centered about 0 0 0). Is there a way to correct this?
Arneh
___
gmx-us
Hi,
In editconf, there's an option -center which allows you to place the
geometrical center of your molecular at a desired location.
I was wondering, is there an analogous option for the placement of the
center of mass of a molecule?
Thanks,
Arneh
__
Why not do a steered MD or umbrella sampling, where you start with the
ligand in the binding pocket (in its correct conformation) and gradually
pull it out. If done correctly, you should get a nice PMF.
> Hello!
> I need to calculate the free energy of complex formation between protein A
> and li
g the ends of the axes (in your case, one C in one group and one O in
the other) and the option -z, and it'll dump out a file of the angle those axes
make with the z-axis. Don't be put off by the way it appears to be designed
for helices.
- Original Message
From: Arneh Babakha
ing custom made analysis tools :)
Alternatively, you could output the coordinates for the C and O using
g_traj and use a script to calculate the angles with the z-axis, in
case it's a single bond you're interested in.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On 7/13/07, Arneh Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hi,
Looking through the gmx tools . . . was wondering, which tool would one
use (if such a tool exists) to measure the fluctuation of a user-defined
angle in a trajectory.
For instance, I want to measure the angle defined by a carbonyl vector
(a vector going through a C=O bond) in my molecul
Ok,
So since there are no LJ on H in SPC/E,
should we eliminate the line the line:
XeH 1 1.992e-03 2.775e-06
to be more consistent???
David van der Spoel wrote:
Morgan Lawrenz wrote:
Hi all, I am doing umbrella sampling on 2 Xenon atoms in a solvated
3 nm
box, with the at
You have to collect all of the pdo files into one directory (and so you'll
have to rename them if they all have identical names). Then zip them
using gzip: gzip *.pdo
Then you can use the g_wham code, something like:
g_wham *.gz -bins 1000 -temp 300 -auto
>> Hey Mark,
>> Appreciate y
Great thanks, I had no idea such a tool existed.
Also, if we're doing Xenon in water (spc) simulations, we have to
parameterize the nonbonded interactions between OW and Xe, and H and Xe,
right? That parameterization doesn't already exist, or does it?
David van der Spoel wro
Hi GMX community,
We're doing some MD involving Xenon atoms. For our parameterization, we
obtained sigma and epsilon (over kB) values of 3.975 Ang. and 214.7 K,
from the following JCP reference:
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JCPSA600012014006674
Ahh yes, you're right. The script is in the right directory, but for
some reason it keeps reverting back to my home directory. I threw in a
cd line to fix it. Thanks for the help!
Arneh
Mark Abraham wrote:
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing an awkward error. I
Hi,
I'm experiencing an awkward error. I created an analysis script to
calculate some RMSDs (I've pasted the script below).
When I try to run the script, I get an error. The following is the
output.
Option Filename Type Description
---
Hello,
I'd like to use g_density to obtain a density distribution plot. Now,
I'd like to place the center of that distribution on the zero of the
horizontal axis. How do I so using g_density? From reading the
manual, I see there's an option, "-center", which should do the trick.
But I've
o a beta server that will generate
topology files consistent with the 43a1 FF.
Cheers Mitch
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 17:48 -0800, Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hi , I'd like to build a topology of a Drug. I'm aware of the PRODRG
website.
But if my understanding is correct, on this website,
Hi , I'd like to build a topology of a Drug. I'm aware of the PRODRG
website.
But if my understanding is correct, on this website, you can only build
using one forcefield (GROMOS87).
How does one build a topology using a different force field (say for
instance, oplsaa)? Is there a simple w
Hi, I was wondering if there's a way to read in only part of a pdo file,
when using g_wham? For instance, I only want the first half of my pdo
file. Does g_wham have any options that allow you to read in only the
first half, or do I have to go in and delete the second half in the pdo
file?
Hello, I was wondering if someone could provide a brief explanation of
the -tol option (for setting the tolerance) in the g_wham tool. What
exactly is this "tolerance", of what? (I couldn't find anything in the
manual, nor the mailing list. If someone could point me in the right
direction, I
Diane,
how big is the transmembrane part of your protein?
Diane Fournier wrote:
Hi gmx-users
I am trying to set up an ED experiment with the low resolution
structure of a membrane protein in the hope of generating NMR-like
structures. >From what I have read until now, I know that I should
C. Next time it may be better to center
your system at the box center.
Best,
Tsjerk
On 9/21/06, Arneh Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting a quirky result from my minimization of my system (which
consists of a small peptide in a membrane, solvated).
Whe
Hi,
I'm getting a quirky result from my minimization of my system (which
consists of a small peptide in a membrane, solvated).
When I look at the trr of the minimization (or the outputted structure
after minization), I notice that my membrane has been inverted, and
there are 4 copies of
Great, thanks Chris!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to build some lipids around a peptide. Can I do so using
genconf? (I know genconf can be used to build a membrane. I'm
asking if genconf can be used to build a membrane around a solute,
like a transmembrane protein?)
"around"? No.
I'
Dear GMX Users,
I'd like to build some lipids around a peptide. Can I do so using
genconf? (I know genconf can be used to build a membrane. I'm asking
if genconf can be used to build a membrane around a solute, like a
transmembrane protein?)
I'm also aware of the make_hole tool. My que
Hi everyone, quick question about g_msd,
When I execute: g_msd -f FullMD1.trr -s FullMD1.tpr -n
ForDiffusion.ndx -o test -lateral z
At the end, the following is outputted in my terminal:
D[ Protein] 0.1207 (+/- 0.0847) 1e-5 cm^2/s
My index file only contains one group, labeled Protein
another node, the wrong ppa file was read.
So the moral of the story is: When running AFM pulling in parallel, make
sure that the names following "-pi" and "-po" differ! (something like,
"-pi PeptidePull -po ExtraPeptidePull).
Thanks!
Arneh
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hi
GXM Users,
I'm trying to execute some AFM pulling. My index file contains two
groups, [TopPeptide] and [DMPC]. I execute grompp, then when I try
to execute mdrun:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SteeredMD]$ mdrun -s SMD-01.tpr -o SMD-01 -c
AfterSMD-01 -e SMD-01 -g SMD-01 -pi PeptidePull.
Hello GMX Users,
I have some specific questions about the constrained MD run options, as
explained on page 116 (in the Special Topics section) of the GMX manual.
1. Regarding "constraint_direction = "What exactly is the meaning
of the 3 values inputted here? Does 1.0 0.0 0.0 mean
Hello,
I have a small peptide that I'd like to solvate with glycerol (instead
of water). I couldn't find a .gro and .itp file for glycerol in the top
directory. I was wondering if anyone has such files and would be
willing to share them?
In looking at the other solvent .gro files (i.e. spc
Thanks. In GMX, is there a tool for integrating the mean force from an
ensemble of configurations (in order to obtain the pmf)? Or does one
have to do that by other means?
Thanks,
Arneh
David van der Spoel wrote:
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hello,
Can someone please describe the general
Hello,
Can someone please describe the general procedure for PMF (potential of
mean force) calculations using GROMACS? Is there an analysis tool for
this (I didn't see one), or a combination of tools? (Please note: I'm
not asking for details. I'm just seeking a general method for
calculatin
Hello GMX users,
(this may be more of a tcsh question, but here goes anyway).
I'm trying to write a script to go through some trajectories and
calculate hbonding. It looks like this:
#!/bin/tcsh
foreach number (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11)
g_hbond -f ../../FullMD/FullMD$number.trr -s
..
Thanks, I'll give it a shot . . .
Arneh
Mark Abraham wrote:
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Sure . . . was just wondering if I could do it with an option in GMX
. . . would be a lot easier to implement in the analysis scripts that
I already have.
Well I've never used Matlab, but I Googl
Sure . . . was just wondering if I could do it with an option in GMX . .
. would be a lot easier to implement in the analysis scripts that I
already have.
Thanks,
Arneh
David Mobley wrote:
You could write a little MATLAB function to strip the headers...
On 6/27/06, Arneh Babakhani <[EM
Hello,
Is there an option I can use (with the various analysis tools) to
prevent the output of the header information, when producing an xvg
file? (In other words, to produce a data file, containing strictly the
data). This is for plotting purposes in MATLAB.
Thanks,
Arneh
Hi Carsten, thanks for the reply, good question.
I can run it fine on as much as 4 processors, but nothing beyond that.
Any idea why?
Arneh
Carsten Kutzner wrote:
Hi Arneh,
do you have the same problem on less processors? Can you run on 1, 2
and 4
procs?
Carsten
Arneh Babakhani wrote
Hi All,
Ok, I've successfully created the mpi version of mdrun. Am now trying to
run my simulation on 32 processors. After processing with grompp and the
option -np 32, I use mdrun with the following script (where CONF is the
input file, NPROC is the number of processors):
/opt/mpich/intel/bin/
Hi, I was having this same problem. I tried running like this:
/opt/mpich/intel/bin/mpirun -v -np $NPROC
-machinefile \$TMPDIR/machines ~/gromacs-mpi/bin/mdrun -np $NPROC -s
$CONF -o $CONF -c After$CONF -e $CONF -g $CONF >& $CONF.job
mpirun with the -v option (I'm not exactly sure what that
to a missing LAM library:
---
error while loading shared libraries: liblamf77mpi.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
---
So make shure that this library can be found, probably in
/path-to-lam-installation/lib
Hope that helps,
Carsten
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hello
Sunjoo, is there a particular reason why you want to you anisotropic
pressure coupling? (I recently tried this myself, on a DMPC bilayer).
Some of the key membrane physical properties (like thickness, area per
lipid, order parameters) were distorted and did not agree with
experimental evidence.
Hello, in the GMX manual, on page 117, it states:
afm rate1 =
afm rate2 =
The rate at which the spring moves in *nm/ps* for each group.
In my ppa file, I specify:
* afm rate1 = 1*
But in the log file of my mdrun, it states:
Pull rate: 1.00e+00 *nm/ns*. Force constant: 1.00e+03 k
Hello, on this note, I'm having issues configuring and installing the
mpi enabled mdrun. (see below). I keep getting a strange error:
checking size of int... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof
(int), 77
I've pasted the output below, and I've attached the config.log for
reference. I'm rea
So what does config.log tell you? Which test program does not compile?
To be honest, I can't tell what's going on in config.log (I've pasted it
below). I see a 'failed program' message with respect to confdefs.h ,
but I saw this during the configuration without mpi enabled (and it
worked f
Hi Francisco, was wondering if you ever resolved this issue? I too am
trying to install gromacs mpi on our cluster, but have had no luck. I
get the following error in the configure step:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gromacs-3.3.1]$ ./configure --enable-mpi
--prefix=/home/ababakha/gromacs-3.3.1
checkin
-g ResMD1 > & ResMD1.job &"
Beniamino
Arneh Babakhani ha scritto:
grompp -f ResMD1.mdp -c ../Heating/AfterHeatup.gro -p NoBadWater.top
-o ResMD1 ;
mpirun -np 4 mdrun -s ResMD1.tpr -o ResMD1 -c AfterResMD1 -e ResMD1
-g ResMD1 > & ResMD1.job &
Mark Abraham wrote:
Arneh
grompp -f ResMD1.mdp -c ../Heating/AfterHeatup.gro -p NoBadWater.top -o
ResMD1 ;
mpirun -np 4 mdrun -s ResMD1.tpr -o ResMD1 -c AfterResMD1 -e ResMD1 -g
ResMD1 > & ResMD1.job &
Mark Abraham wrote:
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hello, I'm having a similar problem, although my OS
Hello, I'm having a similar problem, although my OS sees all 4 of my
processors just fine.
When I run mpirun -c 4 mdrun . . .
all 4 of my processors are running, but only at 50% each. Furthermore,
in present working directory, I see several backed up files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] TEMP]$ ls
After
parameters files an atom
definition files (.rtp)
Arneh Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*Hello, I'm getting the following warning when running grompp:*
processing coordinates...
Warning: atom names in ../BuildInitialStructure/NoBadWater.top and
../BuildInitialStructure/NoB
x27;m more
than willing to attach my gro and top file, so you can see them in their
entirety.
thanks,
Arneh
David van der Spoel wrote:
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
*Hello, I'm getting the following warning when running grompp:*
processing coordinates...
Warning: atom names in ../BuildI
Hello, I'm getting the following warning when running grompp:
processing coordinates...
Warning: atom names in ../BuildInitialStructure/NoBadWater.top and
../BuildInitialStructure/NoBadWater.gro don't match (HW2 - OW)
Warning: atom names in ../BuildInitialStructure/NoBadWater.top and
../BuildI
Can you use this freezegroups function during a minimizaiton? (say if
you wanted to minimize solvent around your protein, while keeping the
protein fixed?)
David van der Spoel wrote:
Soren Enemark wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
what you need to do is:
1. create an index file (.ndx) with the groups t
for the next carbon
down.
--- Arneh Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Alan, great, thanks, I suspected something like
that.
Then, is there a way to calculate the Scd order
parameters for these
carbons, given that there are no explicit
hydrogens???
Arneh
Alan Dodd wrote:
The
either side of each
carbon to place the hydrogens, and hence calculate the
order parameter.
--- Arneh Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello,
Now with the g_order bug fixed (see bugzilla #84) ,
I'm trying to
calculate the orderparameters for 13 carbon atoms of
the the sn2 chain
Hello,
Now with the g_order bug fixed (see bugzilla #84) , I'm trying to
calculate the orderparameters for 13 carbon atoms of the the sn2 chain
(carbons 2B thru 2N) of a DMPC membrane. So I create an index file,
make a group for each type of carbon, then run g_order.
The groups in the inde
FYI, the bug in g_order has been resolved, see:
http://bugzilla.gromacs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
for details.
Sukit Leekumjorn wrote:
Dear GMX users,
I have encounter some problem with g_order in Gromacs3.3.1. I noticed
that tetrahedral order parameter has been added to the new version and
for
The bug in g_order has been resolved, see:
http://bugzilla.gromacs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hello GROMACS community,
I was wondering if somebody could walk me through the process of
calculating lipid order parameters (for a DMPC membrane), using the
g_order analysis tool
Hello,
Can anyone describe the general procedure for SMD in GROMACS? (i.e. how
you designate which atoms are to be pulled, in what direction, and by
what force).
Thanks,
Arneh
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.o
As have I. Very well, I have submitted a bugzilla (#84),
Arneh
Sukit Leekumjorn wrote:
Concerning the problem with g_order in Gromacs 3.3.1.
I did try fixing the problem as suggested, however, I could not get it
to work. In the mean time, I just use g_order from 3.3 version.
Sukit
Arneh
Hi Pedro, thank you for your prompt reply.
I'm attempting to do what you suggested.
1). I create an index file, called sn2.ndx, which contains 14 groups,
one group for each carbon type in the chain (labeled C2A, C2B, . . . C2N).
2) I then try to execute the following command:
g_order -f Ful
Prof. Van Der Spoel,
Regarding your suggestion here: Where exactly are lines 579 and 580
that one must modify? (I'm having this same error)
Thanks,
Arneh
David van der Spoel wrote:
Sukit Leekumjorn wrote:
Dear GMX users,
I have encounter some problem with g_order in Gromacs3.3.1. I
no
Hello GROMACS community,
I was wondering if somebody could walk me through the process of
calculating lipid order parameters (for a DMPC membrane), using the
g_order analysis tool?
I've got a 5 ns trajectory and would like to make one of the classic
order parameter plots:
i.e.
On the y-axis: the
Hello GROMACS community,
I was wondering if somebody could walk me through the process of
calculating lipid order parameters (for a DMPC membrane), using the
g_order analysis tool?
I've got a 5 ns trajectory and would like to make one of the classic
order parameter plots:
i.e.
On the y-axis
Hello,
Would the following be a reasonable way to implement semiisotropic
pressure coupling, for a 128 DMPC membrane:
; Pressure coupling is on
Pcoupl = berendsen
pcoupltype = semiisotropic
tau_p = 1.0 1.0
compressibility = 4.5e-5 1.0e-30
ref_p = 1.0 1.0
[I'm not asking whether this will prod
Great, thank you very much, will try it out,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I have a solvated membrane and I want to extend the z dimension and add new
waters there, this is what I do. The script could be modified to get rid of new
waters in any x/y/z dimensions (around line 41 of the script).
1.
Thanks for the input. Is there a way to restrict the water from a
certain space (in other words, to confine it a certain location)?
Thanks,
Arneh
David van der Spoel wrote:
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hello all,
How do you remove unwanted waters (or how do you prevent genbox from
placing
Hello all,
How do you remove unwanted waters (or how do you prevent genbox from
placing unwanted waters) after you solvate by genbox?
This problem was posted once before,
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2005-December/018997.html
but it doesn't seem like it was resolved. Is there an
this was the problem. I had the bloody inclusion files switched around!
Thanks for your help!
Arneh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
appologies, CA is valid. Did you include lipid.itp before including dmpc.itp?
I can't see what the problem is. Send your full commands and your top file.
_
Hi, thank you for your input. I did that. Now I'm getting this error.
---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: toputil.c, line: 61
Fatal error:
Atomtype 'CA' not found!
---
This d
Hi, I'm trying to include the files dmpc.itp and lipid.itp , so that
pdb2gmx will recognize it when building my membrane toplogy.
Where exactly do I place the statement:
#include "dmpc.itp"
#include "lipid.itp"
???
I tried placing it in ffG43a2x.itp (that's the forcefield I'm using).
But I
Hello, I'm experiencing the exact same problem, when trying to do some
restrained molecular dynamics of a small peptide in a water box. Have
you had any luck in trouble-shooting this? (I've pasted my mdp file
below, for your reference). Also running Gromacs 3.3.1
Arneh
title = ResMD
warnings
Thank you for your input, I fixed it. You need to include:
define = -DFLEXIBLE
in the mdp file.
Arneh
Mark Abraham wrote:
Arneh Babakhani wrote:
Hello,
*When trying to do CG minimization, I keep getting the following error:*
Converted 0 out of 0 CUBICBONDS to morse bonds for
Hello,
When trying to do CG minimization, I keep getting the following
error:
Converted 0 out of 0 CUBICBONDS to morse bonds for mol 8
processing coordinates...
double-checking input for internal consistency...
ERROR: can not do Conjugate Gradients with constraints (12309)
There were 3 warni
Dear GROMACS users,
Is it possible to run a minimization (or MD) with some atoms fixed, in
GROMACS?
Thanks,
Arneh
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe r
Hello,
I'm a new GROMACS user. Just a simple question: Can I use GROMACS to
build a small peptide (6 residues), de novo? If so, how do I do this?
Thanks,
Arneh
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/li
90 matches
Mail list logo