[gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield

2012-10-10 Thread Elie M
Dear all, Is the form of the .n2t file (read by x2top to produce the top file) the same for all forcefields? I am using the CHARMM forcefield but I could not find an ffcharmm27.n2t file. Regards Elie -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org

RE: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield

2012-10-10 Thread Elie M
forcefield On 10/10/12 10:35 PM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, Is the form of the .n2t file (read by x2top to produce the top file) the same for all forcefields? I am using the CHARMM forcefield but I could not find an ffcharmm27.n2t file. The .n2t format is universal. Most force

RE: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield

2012-10-10 Thread Elie M
] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield On 10/10/12 11:11 PM, Elie M wrote: Ok. This means that I have to form the .n2t file for the CHARMM field as it is required by x2top. For the OPLSAA field the format was: Copls_1570.000 12.011 4H 0.108 H 0.108 H 0.108 C

[gmx-users] RB parameters for the OPLSAA force field.

2012-10-09 Thread Elie M
Dear all, Does anyone know where I can find reference of how to calculate the RB parameters (C0-C5) for proper dihedrals? I have got some undefined dihedrals in my top file and I am not sure where to start. What kind of information do i need to calculate those parameters? any package that does

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-06 Thread Elie M
to Hydrogen because the symbol is SH?? maybe this is the source of the error and I have to redefine things in the .n2t file? Elie Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:06:34 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/5/12 1:00 PM, Elie M

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-06 Thread Elie M
: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/6/12 1:18 PM, Elie M wrote: This is what I did. For example one of the [bonds] problems is a bond between S and one of the carbons C in the thiophene molecule. In the n2t file. I have added OPLSA_734 S because it si related to all-atom S

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-06 Thread Elie M
it is a bit weird because the bond is there in the file then why it cannot find it? Any suggestions? Elie Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 13:59:10 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/6/12 1:57 PM, Elie M wrote: Yes I just

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-05 Thread Elie M
On 10/4/12 5:56 PM, Elie M wrote: I guess the first parameter of each pair is easy to find. what about kb? k theta?. kb is the force constant isnt it? any reference about a method how to calculate them please? pr anything atht might be of help. Bonded parameters

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-04 Thread Elie M
On 10/3/12 7:48 PM, Elie M wrote: Sorry it seems that those breaks are due to hotmail and not present in the topology. Thanks for your reply. I still have problems...I will tell u briefly and as clear as possible what i did. (1) My top file has the following lines ate first

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-04 Thread Elie M
the source of error be known and corrected? Elie Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:26:04 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/4/12 10:12 AM, Elie M wrote: Hello everyone, Justin, I have repeated the procedures without doing any

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-04 Thread Elie M
Oct 2012 12:25:48 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/4/12 12:13 PM, Elie M wrote: Thanks a lot. I have sorted out the error that occured in the ffoplsaabon.itp; I have commented ; one line which was given the first

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-04 Thread Elie M
-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/4/12 4:22 PM, Elie M wrote: I guess now I get what is happening finally. Correct me if I am wrong. The .top file was produced using an .n2t file (mine was ffoplsaamod.n2t) which was also modified to include atoms

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-03 Thread Elie M
- From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Elie M Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2012 1:39 PM To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp I am a bit confused..I am getting different errors though similar in goal. The error

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-03 Thread Elie M
@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/3/12 10:03 AM, Elie M wrote: Hello Emanuel. First of all thank you for your help. I am sorry if my previous e-mail was a bit confusing. I will tell what I did recently. (1) I removed all the information :molecule type

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-01 Thread Elie M
Thanks for your time and help as always. I will see what I can do about that. Elie Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:38:15 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/1/12 12:38 AM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, Maybe this error has

RE: [gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-10-01 Thread Elie M
to match that .top file or what? and which file should be in the same order of which? Thanks Elie Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:38:15 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error with grompp On 10/1/12 12:38 AM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, Maybe

[gmx-users] Error with grompp

2012-09-30 Thread Elie M
Dear all, Maybe this error has been discussed before; I have checked previous messages on it but i could not resolve it. I have done a modified version of the oplsaa forcefield which I have called ffoplsaamod.n2t. The top file was created successfully. However when I run grompp, I get the

[gmx-users] .itp and .rtp file modifications?

2012-09-29 Thread Elie M
Dear all, I am trying to minimize the energy of a polymer system I have. I have successfully modified the n2t file to include force fields for atoms that were not present. However now I am using grompp before using mdrun (to minimize). However I have a question should the .ITP and .RTP files

[gmx-users] error with x2top.

2012-09-25 Thread Elie M
Dear all, i am trying to convert a .gro file into a top file using .x2top but not all atoms can be assigned forcefields and the code stops with the error: Generating bonds from distances...atom 94Can not find forcefield for atom C-2 with 2 bondsCan not find forcefield for atom S-3 with 0

RE: [gmx-users] error with x2top.

2012-09-25 Thread Elie M
] error with x2top. On 9/25/12 4:28 PM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, i am trying to convert a .gro file into a top file using .x2top but not all atoms can be assigned forcefields and the code stops with the error: Generating bonds from distances...atom 94Can not find forcefield for atom C

RE: [gmx-users] error with x2top.

2012-09-25 Thread Elie M
Yep You are right. I will try my best to change the files accordingly. Thanks Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:05:20 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] error with x2top. On 9/25/12 5:02 PM, Elie M wrote: Thanks for your reply. I guess either

[gmx-users] a quick question (forgot to ask).

2012-09-25 Thread Elie M
. On 9/25/12 5:02 PM, Elie M wrote: Thanks for your reply. I guess either way (x2top or pdb2gmx), I have problems. pdb2gmx is giving the same old error residue 'UNK' is not found in topology residue file whereas strangely enough x2top did not complain and was able to assign

[gmx-users] Missing charges in a .gro file

2012-09-23 Thread Elie M
Dear all, I have created a .GRO file from a PDB file for a polymer. However in the PDB I have positive and negative charges of some ions where as in the produced GRO file these disappear. Are those charged atoms taken into account in the gro file as I will be doing a MD simulation of such

RE: [gmx-users] Missing charges in a .gro file

2012-09-23 Thread Elie M
Thanks for your help. Elie Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:05:14 +0800 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Missing charges in a .gro file From: terrence...@gmail.com To: gmx-users@gromacs.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Elie M elie.mouj...@hotmail.co.uk wrote: Dear all, I have created

[gmx-users] Input/output error in GROMACS

2012-09-20 Thread Elie M
Dear all, I am trying to use editconf to produce a .GRO file from an .XYZ file but I am getting the following error: Program editconf, VERSION 4.0.5Source code file: futil.c, line: 330 File input/output error:S54NONSOLV.xyz.gro Some of the input file is:46S54 NONSOLVATED POLYMERC 5.33751

RE: [gmx-users] use of PRODRG

2012-09-19 Thread Elie M
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 05:23:28 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] use of PRODRG On 9/18/12 10:35 PM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, I have been reading about PRODRG that takes a PDB file as an input and produces topologies compatible

RE: [gmx-users] use of PRODRG

2012-09-19 Thread Elie M
Thanks for your time and help as usual. Elie Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:47:26 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] use of PRODRG On 9/19/12 11:40 AM, Elie M wrote: I don't understand this. PRODRG will be of no use here since you are using

[gmx-users] use of PRODRG

2012-09-18 Thread Elie M
Dear all, I have been reading about PRODRG that takes a PDB file as an input and produces topologies compatible with GROMACS as an output. Can this program be then considered as a solution to the problem of missing residues in GROMACS like LIG? N.B: I am using the OPLSAA force field .I also

RE: [gmx-users] Segmentation fault (core dumped error)

2012-09-15 Thread Elie M
dumped error) On 9/14/12 12:19 AM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, I am trying to study the MD of a Carbon Nanotube interacting with some polymers. and I have some problems in forming the topology files. I have actually two questions and I hope you can help me in that. (1) In an attempt

[gmx-users] energy minimisation of carbon nanotubes.

2012-09-15 Thread Elie M
Dear all, I have a small question regarding energy minimization. I am minimizing a carbon naotube in vaccuo and my (mdp )input file is: ; ; SWNT (10,0) on its own ; Elie Moujaes, SWNT+polymers project ; Energy minimization input file ; cpp =/usr/bin/cpp define

RE: [gmx-users] energy minimisation of carbon nanotubes.

2012-09-15 Thread Elie M
Thank you for your reply and help. Regards Elie Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:32:06 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] energy minimisation of carbon nanotubes. On 9/15/12 12:49 PM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, I have a small question regarding

[gmx-users] Segmentation fault (core dumped error)

2012-09-13 Thread Elie M
Dear all, I am trying to study the MD of a Carbon Nanotube interacting with some polymers. and I have some problems in forming the topology files. I have actually two questions and I hope you can help me in that. (1) In an attempt to form the topology files of CNTs and graphene (using x2top),

[gmx-users] error in producing top file for a structure

2012-09-08 Thread Elie M
Dear all, I am new to GROMACS. I am trying to minimize a structure but first I have to form the pdb file with the correct force field parameters. I am using version 4.0.5 and an OPLSAA force field. The error I am getting is:...Opening library file

RE: [gmx-users] error in producing top file for a structure

2012-09-08 Thread Elie M
...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] error in producing top file for a structure On 9/8/12 4:29 PM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, I am new to GROMACS. I am trying to minimize a structure but first I have to form the pdb file with the correct force field parameters. I

RE: [gmx-users] error in producing top file for a structure

2012-09-08 Thread Elie M
Thanks very much for the help. I will see what I can do about that. Sincerely ELie Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:50:00 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] error in producing top file for a structure On 9/8/12 4:46 PM, Elie M wrote: Thanks