Will a simulation from 4.6.1 continue running fine if I upgrade to 4.6.4?
> Hi GROMACS users,
>
> GROMACS 4.6.4 is officially released. It contains numerous bug fixes, and
> some noteworthy simulation performance enhancements (particularly with
> GPUs!). We encourage all users to upgrade their ins
What does your curve look like? What parameters are you using in the mdp?
How big is your system and what kind of molecules are in there? Providing
this kind of information would help people work out what the problem is.
Then again it may be ok that the minimisation has converged without
reaching
I notice that both papers mention modifications to GROMACS and cite the
following:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16471903
> Following up on Justin's reply I just want to add that, not only is it
> possible, as it has been done before. For instance:
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18214
I think ProDy can do this. It is a python module for analysis of
structures that can be downloaded from http://www.csb.pitt.edu/ProDy/
I'm not sure it can read xtc but you can probably use it after converting
trajectories to pdb.
>> On 10/30/13 11:26 AM, Knapp Bernhard wrote:
>>> Hi users,
>>>
>>>
Yes, I would use the same command to continue the simulation after
stopping with the addition of -cpi
Every time a .cpt is made, the previous one is renamed _prev.cpt so that
you can still get it in case something happened in between the two.
Normally I would use the .cpt but if that doesn't work
You're welcome
On 28 Oct 2013, at 20:03, Pavan Ghatty wrote:
> Aah yes of course. Thanks James.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:16 PM, wrote:
>
>> No this isn't a problem. You can use job names under the -hold_jid flag.
>> As long as you change the job name in the submit script between
>>
No this isn't a problem. You can use job names under the -hold_jid flag.
As long as you change the job name in the submit script between
submissions this isn't a problem. You could have a submit script for job 4
with -N md_job4 and -hold_jid md_job3 then change these to -N md_job5 and
-hold_jid md_
I think nstcalclr would only do something if you have longer range
interactions to calculate (lr means longer than rlist). Therefore
something has be longer than rlist for this to happen.
> Hi there,
>
> I am using gromacs-4.6.1 with this mdp file:
>
> integrator= md; leap-frog int
I usually use -pbc nojump for my protein simulations and this works every
time.
> Dear gromacs users
>
> My system contains DOPC + CHOLESTEROLO + WATER + drug molecules in a
> rectangular box.
>
> I put drug molecule in 2 position: a) drug in the center of bilayer
> membrane, b) drug inside water
Please could I have an account too.
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm writing to let you guys know that we have developed a web-based tool
> MD
> simulation tool for GROMACS. It is a software package primarily developed
> for biological MD and offers a huge amount of possible options and
> settings
> for ta
Hi Tsjerk,
In my opinion, we don't need to develop LEGO specifically for this -
something already exists, which I played with in school. The molymod
pieces (http://www.molymod.com/) already include bendy pieces, which are
the next step on the lego website you advertise.
Best wishes
James
> Hi :)
I suppose there would also be a way of passing do_dssp output on to
make_ndx then you could use the index with g_hbond to count hbonds in each
secondary structure element.
Best wishes
James
> If the goal is to simply count the secondary structure, pass the dssp
> output file through grep "__" dss
12 matches
Mail list logo