Re: [gmx-users] BUG in angular removal part??

2011-04-27 Thread David van der Spoel
+0200 From: David van der Spoel Subject: Re: [gmx-users] BUG in angular removal part?? To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Message-ID: <4db7b6b4.5090...@xray.bmc.uu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 2011-04-26 19.38, Xiaohu Li wrote: Hi, gromacs develope

Re: [gmx-users] BUG in angular removal part??

2011-04-27 Thread Xiaohu Li
: Re: [gmx-users] BUG in angular removal part?? To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Message-ID: <4db7b6b4.5090...@xray.bmc.uu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 2011-04-26 19.38, Xiaohu Li wrote: Hi, gromacs developers, It seems that there is a bug regardi

Re: [gmx-users] BUG in angular removal part??

2011-04-26 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2011-04-26 19.38, Xiaohu Li wrote: Hi, gromacs developers, It seems that there is a bug regarding the angular moment removal. This may not be very important for many users since most of them are doing PBC where it is irrelevant, but if you are doing cluster or if you really care the angular mo

[gmx-users] BUG in angular removal part??

2011-04-26 Thread Xiaohu Li
Hi, gromacs developers, It seems that there is a bug regarding the angular moment removal. This may not be very important for many users since most of them are doing PBC where it is irrelevant, but if you are doing cluster or if you really care the angular momentum like I do(I want the ang