Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-14 Thread Abhishek Acharya
Hello Justin Thank you very much for your effort and help. I will try adding new parameter corresponding to the errors. Meanwhile just out of curiosity and possible need, what should be done in case no matching parameters are found for the missing dihedrals? I see that there are 6 fields in the

Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-14 Thread Abhishek Acharya
Hello Justin Thank you very much for your effort and help. I will try adding new parameter corresponding to the errors. Meanwhile just out of curiosity and possible need, what should be done in case no matching parameters are found for the missing dihedrals? I see that there are 6 fields in

Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-14 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/14/13 11:54 AM, Abhishek Acharya wrote: Hello Justin Thank you very much for your effort and help. I will try adding new parameter corresponding to the errors. Meanwhile just out of curiosity and possible need, what should be done in case no matching parameters are found for the missing

Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-14 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/14/13 4:15 PM, Abhishek Acharya wrote: Hello Justin Thank you very much for your effort and help. I will try adding new parameter corresponding to the errors. Meanwhile just out of curiosity and possible need, what should be done in case no matching parameters are found for the missing

Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-12 Thread Abhishek Acharya
Hello Justin. Help would really be appreciated. And yes you are correct and i thought the same. Initially I tried using opls_345B but it didn't work. In fact if I use opls_345B it gives me an additional error. Anyhow here are the relevant files. topology file: # [atoms] 15 ; nr type

Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 6:19 AM, Abhishek Acharya wrote: Hello Justin. Help would really be appreciated. And yes you are correct and i thought the same. Initially I tried using opls_345B but it didn't work. In fact if I use opls_345B it gives me an additional error. Anyhow here are the relevant files.

Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-10 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/9/13 9:50 PM, Abhishek Acharya wrote: Dear Gromacs Users. I generated a topology file of GDP for OPLSAA force field using MKTOP. But on running grompp I got a list of No default Angle types and No default Ryckaert Bell. types error. So this time i manually assigned the appropriate atom

[gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-09 Thread Abhishek Acharya
Dear Gromacs Users. I generated a topology file of GDP for OPLSAA force field using MKTOP. But on running grompp I got a list of No default Angle types and No default Ryckaert Bell. types error. So this time i manually assigned the appropriate atom types by looking up the atomtypes.atp file and