Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-13 Thread Kavyashree M
Ok... I will try other options. Thanks Kavya On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > On 7/13/12 12:05 PM, Kavyashree M wrote: >> >> Its 50ns 25000 frames. the xtc file is 695MB. it has 16GB RAM. So will >> that be insufficient? I have previously run other analysis which u

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-13 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 7/13/12 12:05 PM, Kavyashree M wrote: Its 50ns 25000 frames. the xtc file is 695MB. it has 16GB RAM. So will that be insufficient? I have previously run other analysis which used to take huge memory, for eg. covariance analysis, in a system with much lesser memory even though CPU usage was l

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-13 Thread Kavyashree M
Its 50ns 25000 frames. the xtc file is 695MB. it has 16GB RAM. So will that be insufficient? I have previously run other analysis which used to take huge memory, for eg. covariance analysis, in a system with much lesser memory even though CPU usage was low the job used to finish. But in this case i

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-13 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 7/13/12 11:50 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: Dear users, Its the continuation of the question I asked yesterday, Inorder to reduce the memory usage during g_saltbr calculations i got the trajectory of only protein, and tpr file without water and was able to successfully run it. But unfortunately t

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-13 Thread Kavyashree M
Dear users, Its the continuation of the question I asked yesterday, Inorder to reduce the memory usage during g_saltbr calculations i got the trajectory of only protein, and tpr file without water and was able to successfully run it. But unfortunately this again got stopped at 36ns as it had stopp

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Kavyashree M
Dear Sir, Thank you It worked :). a very usefull suggestion. But it did not promt to choose any option. I used index file. Thank you Kavya On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > On 7/12/12 8:31 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: >> >> Ok may be i need to specify an index file. I wi

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 7/12/12 8:31 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: Ok may be i need to specify an index file. I will try that. And regarding the WARNING: this .tpx file is not fully functional. I hope it will work fine enough to finish g_saltbr calculation? In principle, you should be prompted to choose a default grou

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Kavyashree M
Ok may be i need to specify an index file. I will try that. And regarding the WARNING: this .tpx file is not fully functional. I hope it will work fine enough to finish g_saltbr calculation? Thanks Kavya On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Kavyashree M wrote: > I read that. but while executing tpb

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Kavyashree M
I read that. but while executing tpbconv i did not see where i can specify that i do not want solvent? Thanks Kavya On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > On 7/12/12 8:15 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: >> >> Dear Sir, >> >> I had a problem again during g_saltbr calculation it n

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 7/12/12 8:15 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: Dear Sir, I had a problem again during g_saltbr calculation it needs .xtc and .tpr file, I can reduce the .xtc file to have only protein but .tpr file will have water also in it. inorder to generate new tpr file without water using grompp, i need topolog

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Kavyashree M
Dear Sir, I had a problem again during g_saltbr calculation it needs .xtc and .tpr file, I can reduce the .xtc file to have only protein but .tpr file will have water also in it. inorder to generate new tpr file without water using grompp, i need topology file without water .. so do you suggest me

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Kavyashree M
Thanks :). will check whether it makes it faster. On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > On 7/12/12 6:38 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: >> >> Dear Sir, >> >> That is true as the number of the frames increased the >> memory had almost reached 95% but still it has been in >> 95% si

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 7/12/12 6:38 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: Dear Sir, That is true as the number of the frames increased the memory had almost reached 95% but still it has been in 95% since long and CPU usage drops down to 1.5 -2 % but in many cases i have seen that still it will run (off course slowly) and finis

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Kavyashree M
Dear Sir, That is true as the number of the frames increased the memory had almost reached 95% but still it has been in 95% since long and CPU usage drops down to 1.5 -2 % but in many cases i have seen that still it will run (off course slowly) and finish. But this was too long. So any suggestions

Re: [gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 7/12/12 4:51 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: Dear Gromacs users, I was running the saltbridge calculations for a dimeric protein simulation using g_saltbr, But its taking very long time, almost four days still its not completed. Could anyone has suggestion regarding this issue? I am using the same

[gmx-users] g_saltbr speed

2012-07-12 Thread Kavyashree M
Dear Gromacs users, I was running the saltbridge calculations for a dimeric protein simulation using g_saltbr, But its taking very long time, almost four days still its not completed. Could anyone has suggestion regarding this issue? I am using the same system - Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.4