On 11/3/13 6:20 AM, kiana moghaddam wrote:
Dear Justin
Further to your previous email, I want to calculate free energy for DNA-ligand
interaction. According to your answer, for more sensitive calculations like free
energy simulations and normal modes, emtolshould be lower than 1. As
I
On 11/2/13 3:38 PM, kiana moghaddam wrote:
Hi GMX Users
I 'm running MD Simulation for DNA-ligand interaction. I ran energy
minimization with emtol=10, 100 and 250 in 1 steps (steepest descent
followed by the conjugate gradient algorithm). The lowest value for energy
obtained for
Actual text input / output would be a good idea here. What is the actual
output when you try to run it the second time?
Catch ya,
Dr. Dallas Warren
Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics
Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3010
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 4:18 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Energy minimization problem with Double precision
andmpi
Josiah Zayner wrote
Josiah Zayner wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 4:18 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Energy minimization problem with Double precision
andmpi
Josiah
I managed to install mdrun_d from CVS and the problem is fixed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Josiah Zayner
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 1:05 PM
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] Energy minimization problem with Double
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 4:36 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Energy minimization problem with Double precision
andmpi
Josiah Zayner wrote:
I
Hi Arun,
You have to get your methods straight.., and be more clear in the
phrasing of your question.
I am trying to simulate a surfactant-water
system(also contains some co-surfactants). Surfactant is a cationic
surfactant with chloride as counterion. And the
19 apr 2007 kl. 03.45 skrev Venky Krishna:
Hi George,
I usually delete/move the molecules reported to have high force
values in the minimization steps. A better thing would be to start
with a box which has sufficient intermolecular distance again by
deleting molecules which are very
Thanks guys for your replies. The problem is that the potential energy
is too low: it can't be true I think. Also, the high force means that
the system is not really stable (at least the atom influenced by this
force is not!). And yes I defined flexible for the water molecules.
I don't know if
George Abadir wrote:
Thanks guys for your replies. The problem is that the potential energy
is too low: it can't be true I think. Also, the high force means that
the system is not really stable (at least the atom influenced by this
force is not!). And yes I defined flexible for the water
Hi George,
I usually delete/move the molecules reported to have high force
values in the minimization steps. A better thing would be to start
with a box which has sufficient intermolecular distance again by
deleting molecules which are very close to each other (use the
g_mindist program)
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:21:35 -0400 (EDT)
Robson P. S. Peguin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to simulate an interfacial system using
Gromacs. My simulation box has water in one side and
hydrofluorocarbon in the other side. This system was
successfully tested using DL-POLY
13 matches
Mail list logo