I got it to work. thanks for the help.
powering on and off the asante box, *then* rebooting the linux
machine, somehow made it so that the printer was responding to the
non-spooling name again. (though now both show up with nbplkup).
thankyou!
cathy
i'm not sure about the hardware kit from staples. Verizon's DSL uses PPoE
which is supported by Linux. I recently helped a client with his DSL
system, and since his Laptop was pretty much DOA, I plugged in my laptop
into his DSL and it came up right away.
DSL comes in several different
Charles Farinella wrote:
I know that everyone is jazzed about Debian, but I'm a little
concerned about the install.
If you want to try out Debian, but don't want to brave the install,
check out Storm Linux. It's Debian with a slick installer. After the
install, just change your apt-sources
To everyone on the list.. may 2001 be your best year yet!
cheers,
J
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Joshua S. Freeman | preferred email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp public key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was visiting my father-in-law over the holidays and, as usual, I wound up
fixing things on his Win95 computer.
He has a space problem on his 2GB C: drive and we traced it down to a
huge amount of "clip art" in one application. He uses that application
a lot and has customized it
The short answer: No.
The long answer:
1)No. Because:
Windoze does not have any concept of symlinks. The binaries call things
from hard-coded places. This is also the reason that you can't just move
a binary from one directory to another. It just isn't a part of the file
system spec.
2) Yes.
I know that everyone is jazzed about Debian, but I'm a little
concerned about the install.
Ben isn't jazzed. :-)
Seriously, the install isn't that bad -- as long as you don't expect to
have everything working perfectly in an hour or so. Debian requires some
tweaking and playing to get
They've solved the KDE/Debian issue (the legality of distributing KDE (GPL)
and QT (QPL) together, since there we license conflicts, not because QT was
not open-source). KDE 2 is in unstable now, so it will be in the next stable.
Someone's got the KDE stuff for potato, outside of Debian.
Michael O'Donnell wrote:
Ken Lussier wrote:
Nortel Contivity Extranet Server 1510:
That, I presume, is the Roman spelling...
That, I presume, is a reference to by bad spelling ;-) However, in this
case, I actually spelled everything correctly. Either that, or Nortel
has spelling issues of
I'd try Debian, but have not found one with KDE2.
Now that the license issues have been cleared up, the new testing
version of Debian ("Woody") officially has KDE2 in it.
If you add the line:
deb http://kde.tdyc.com/ potato kde kde2 contrib rkrusty
into your /etc/apt/sources.list
I think that the only solution you have is to move the applicaiton. There
are utilities you can get to move an entire application to a different
partition. As Ken Lussier mentioned, you can hack the registry, but I think
a good data mover app, would be a bit better. McAfee's Uninstaller can
Hi folks
This
Dec 31 15:12:39 localhost rpc.statd[302]: gethostbyname
error for ^X÷ÿ¿^X÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿b760 8049710
8052c28687465676274736f6d616e797265206520726f7220726f66
just appeared in my syslog. Other than pointing out that my
machine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Dec 31 15:12:39 localhost rpc.statd[302]: gethostbyname error for
^X÷ÿ¿^X÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Y÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^Z÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿^[÷ÿ¿b760 8049710
8052c28687465676274736f6d616e797265206520726f7220726f66
just appeared in my syslog. Other than pointing out that my machine
thinks
Odds are good that you just had someone try to use a buffer overflow
explooit on your machine. What services do you have open? Did your
security log show anything exciting? I'm sure others on here would know
more than I about figuring out
a) What happened, and
b) if you've actually been
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Odds are good that you just had someone try to use a buffer overflow
explooit on your machine. What services do you have open? Did your
security log show anything exciting? I'm sure others on here would know
more than I about figuring out
a) What
Why are you running rpc.statd on a machine on the internet? It's part of
NFS which is a horrible security leakdo a /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs stop
then run ntsysv and disable that and anything else you don't think you
need (aka: just about everything!).
--rdp
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Tom
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Rich Payne wrote:
Why are you running rpc.statd on a machine on the internet?
'Cuz I don't know any better!! I have turned off the things I know about.
I also have _Maximun Linux Security_, I guess I need to read it too.
It's part of
NFS which is a horrible security
This looks more like a remote format string vulnerability than the work
of a rootkit. rpc.statd has several format string vulnerabilities. The
give-away is the long HEX string preceeded by unreadable characters. The
unreadable characters are the formatted string that statd accepts as
input, and
18 matches
Mail list logo
