I still like the idea of collecting a reward if I find an exploit, rather
than paying to find out about them.
You. Will. Not. Have. To. Pay. To. Find. Out. About. An. Exploit.
Can we make it any more clear for you, or are you being obtuse on purpose?
I know I don't have
Bayard Coolidge USG ZKO3-3/S20 said:
I don't make this stuff up - don't need to - see the URL yourselves !!
They really need to read the RPM manual, and get rid of those antique
8 floppies...
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/daily/detail/0,1136,375113666,00.html
Pie-sized tar
wait wait wait... redhat is the multi-million dollar company. they shouldve
tested 7.0 to mars and back before selling it to consumers. when i buy a linux
distribution off the shelf, or from the company, I dont expect them to use the
most bleeding edge technology (which is what red hat does in
Every system has bugs, yes... even Red Hat!!!
LOL! I was never asserting Red Hat is perfect! :-)
I'll just say to this that I still use RH, but I'm having serious
second thoughts after the latest release disaster. With the internal and
external beta testing they do, they
Hello list,
In an attempt to provide some *useful* information about DNS server security
to the list, ;-), here is the procedure I use to lock down ISC BIND's named on
a Red Hat Linux 6.2 system. I am reporting on RHL 6.2 because that is what I
use, but a lot of this information applies
Well, now, hold on there a minute, Ben There is something that has
been completely missed here. Everyone keeps harping on the Security
holes big enough to drive a truck through in BIND. Everyone keeps
talking about how fixing BIND would require a complete rewrite, and no
one wants to do that.
I don't make this stuff up - don't need to - see the URL yourselves !!
They really need to read the RPM manual, and get rid of those antique
8 floppies...
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/daily/detail/0,1136,375113666,00.html
Pie-sized tar balls wash up on Hollywood beach
By SUSANNAH
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Thomas Charron wrote:
Erm, I didn't invite anything.. That was my first reply on that entire
thread..
Oops, sorry, I got a mite confused between messages and OPs there.
Conversation as its been heard..
Well, now, hold on there a minute, Ben
If you can hold him back, he is frothing at the bit...
There is something that has
been completely missed here. Everyone keeps harping on the Security
holes big enough to drive a truck through in BIND.
Well, yes it IS a problem, being that it
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Peter Cavender wrote:
It sounds like some supposed Linux supporters, rather than being
flag carriers for new and better software, are merely geriatric Unix
sysadmins who want to ride on the coattails of the movement, and refuse to
aquaint themselves with new software,
If we dismissed every service that has a history of
problems, then we would have nothing. Let's see... We have to get rid of
DHCP, NIS, NFS, etc., and we can't forget about the OS's. There goes
Linux, Solaris, AIX, HP-UX, OSF, yadda yadda yadda..
It is not the _services_ that have the
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
A beautiful link, and totally relevant - courtesy of Microsoft Product
Support Services.
Not exactly
http://www.microsoft.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
Translated we get:
Login as: www.microsoft.com
Password: item=q209354
for the
Peter Cavender said:
For all the talk on this list about people being concerned about system
security, it baffles me why, when it comes to things like BIND, people
justify continuing to use it, and attack alternatives without fully
evaluating them. It reminds me more and more of listening to
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Thomas Charron wrote:
Erm, I didn't invite anything.. That was my first reply on that entire
thread..
Oops, sorry, I got a mite confused between messages and OPs there.
Conversation as its been heard..
Conversation as its been heard, here:
Your preferred
Thought y'all might get a kick out of this link:
http://www.microsoft.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
--
I'm going to graduate on time, no matter how long it takes.
- Senior basketball player at the University of Pittsburgh
Cole Tuininga
Network Admin
Code Energy, Inc
[EMAIL
You have to check this out!
A beautiful link, and totally relevant - courtesy of Microsoft Product
Support Services.
http://www.microsoft.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
--
Seeya,
Paul
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
but I'm really actively
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Tony Lambiris wrote:
(which is what red hat does in _all_ their releases... another reason why
I use debian, you have a stable branch, and an unstable branch)
There is plenty of pre-release quality software in the stable
distribution of Debian. For example, Mozilla M14
In a message dated: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:35:38 EST
Paul Lussier said:
http://www.microsoft.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
Strange, this message was sent this morning at 9:35 and it's just showing up
now at 16:52:34. Something wrong with the list, or is the server just that
busy?
--
Benjamin Scott wrote:
There is no excuse for Red Hat shipping a product that will crash after 3
weeks no matter what system its running on.
Red Hat 7.0 does appear to have been subjected to rather substandard QA
procedures.
On the other hand, I think you might be just a little
A URL can be:
http://user:passwd@host:port/
So it is www.hwnd.net, right?
Karl
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to check this out!
A beautiful link, and totally relevant - courtesy of Microsoft Product
Support Services.
Dana,
Glad you are doing better as well as Bill.
I called him yesterday but he was sleeping. His wife Janet said he was
doing lots better and could be released today or tomorrow. Bill will be
home several weeks recuperating.
I am sure he would appreciate emails to keep him company. His address
Kenneth E. Lussier said:
Well, now, hold on there a minute, Ben There is something that has
been completely missed here. Everyone keeps harping on the Security
holes big enough to drive a truck through in BIND. Everyone keeps
talking about how fixing BIND would require a complete rewrite,
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: djbdns
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Thomas Charron wrote:
I do not like software that tells me to go jump in a lake.
*AHEM* Then perhaps you should start scratching your itch, so to
say.
Hey, you are the one who said that said I should go
Um, some of us aren't debating that BIND has had insecurities in the past. I
do argue that it has a process to find holes. My disagreements are with djb's
philosophy and mistatements and attitude. Yes, the code is well-written (I
did download it). I just don't like people telling me how
Ken == Ken D'Ambrosio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote the following on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:47:59 -0500 (EST)
Ken On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote: In a message dated:
Ken Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:35:38 EST Paul Lussier said:
http://www.microsoft.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
I shouldn't even be getting my hands dirty in this...
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote:
I always use Red Hat's text-mode install. I hate the GUI. But some people
could not get by without it. Choice is the operative factor here. Believe it
Don't forget that in the first
I received this this morning. Thought maybe some of you would enjoy a good
short story.
Jerry
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 23 09:16:12 2001
From: Ratzan, Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: minor linux request
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:14:41
Where: Mount Ida College, 777 Dedham St., Newton Center, Ma 02459
Great Room of the Student Center adjacent to the guard shack.
When: Saturday, March 3, 2001 9:00AM to 5:00PM
What you need to bring:
Your computer, monitor, power strips and your Linux distribution.
cost:It's
FTR, this works with StarOffice 5.1a as well. No WONDER SO is so
damn huge!
-derek
Jeffry Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For those using Star Office 5.2 - not only did they copy the bugs/bloat/bad
help (OK, this qualifies as bloat).
Try it.
jeff
In a message dated: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:05:39 EST
Brian Chabot said:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
A beautiful link, and totally relevant - courtesy of Microsoft Product
Support Services.
Not exactly
http://www.microsoft.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
In a message dated: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:35:38 EST
Paul Lussier said:
http://www.microsoft.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
Firstly, this looks to be more of a bug in MS' site than anything else --
no matter what you put in after the @, it
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Tony Lambiris wrote:
wait wait wait... redhat is the multi-million dollar company.
they shouldve
tested 7.0 to mars and back before selling it to consumers. when i buy a linux
distribution off the shelf, or from the company, I dont expect them to use the
most bleeding
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Derek Martin wrote:
Gee, Derek, that's the first time I've ever seen you speechless. ;-)
Hehe... No, I was going to comment, but decided that it simply isn't worth
the effort, since the whole thread is nothing but one giant
33 matches
Mail list logo
