Chad Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Okay, call me slow, but I'm having trouble setting up Public Key
>access to OpenSSH on my RH 7.0 machine.
I'm also having trouble setting up SSH between two machines. At the
moment, it works one way but not the other.
Host "vanzandt" has this:
vanzan
I was hoping to make it to this one but work will be in the way. I was
really looking forward to the information that will be put forth there. Is
there any chance someone w/ a camcorder could video tape the meeting? I
would gladly send them a tape and pay for return postage for a copy.
-Larr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The article says, at one point, "... even the most rabid of Linux advocates
> - and, boy, do some of them get rabid..."
>
>Hey, come on, Bob. Have you been telling them about me? ;-)
>
I didn't have to, your reputation precedes you everywhere.
Bob Sparks
Ne
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Derek Doucette wrote:
> Were on the road to happiness now...
>
> http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/...
The article says, at one point, "... even the most rabid of Linux advocates
- and, boy, do some of them get rabid..."
Hey, come on, Bob. Have you been telling them about
Were on the road to happiness now...
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/Main.asp?SectionID=30&SubSectionID=90&ArticleID=28906
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
In a message dated: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:36:29 EST
Jerry Kubeck said:
>I believe you did have the date wrong Jeff. The meeting is next Wed at
>Martha's (Paul correct me if I am wrong).
Ayup, the fourth Wednesday of every month (or so Jeff Smith keeps
telling me :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
I
Jeff.
We are looking for a calendar to be hosted on the GNHLUG site. The current
one is at one of the SLUG member's server at home (and we really appreciate
it Bob, though I think it is broken again), but I think maybe we need to
put it with the GNHLUG site for quicker response to problems.
I be
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
>> SMB has higher overhead and an incredibly crufty design. But in some cases,
>> SMB can actually be quite a bit faster than NFS. For example, with
>> oplocks, the client can cache file accesses locally, greatly reducing
>> network traffic.
>
> I don't
