All,
I admit to not being the most knowledgeable person when it comes to
IMAP, so the fact that I need to ask a few stupid questions comes as
no surprise to me. So, here goes:
I have IMAP (IMAP4rev1 v12.264) running out of inetd on the same
system as sendmail. From the client, I can send and
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I read that the original worm used a fixed seed to generate its
random addresses, but that later varients used a random seed.
Ah, that would explain what I am seeing better. Thanks!
Anyway, just when I thought my analysis
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Karl J. Runge wrote:
Anyway, just when I thought my analysis method was well established
(maybe I could measure how the number of infected systems decreases
with time...) I got deluged with 300 additional port 80 hits this
afternoon!!!
It seems to be a variant (same IIS
Well, I think I can answer your questions:
1) Instead of inetd, why not just leave it up? A portscan'll launch it,
anyway, so you'd best trust the security, no?
2) IMHO, IMAP's folder paradigm is dumb: you can only create folders
*inside* your inbox. Give that a try, and see what
