Re: Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2

2002-07-06 Thread plussier
In a message dated: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 19:46:58 EDT "Bayard R. Coolidge" said: >But, I do believe that when an employer issues you a piece of gear, they >have the right to tell you what you can/will run on it and have the >expectation that you will follow that edict. The flip side of that They ar

"OS choice" or "Keep your dirty mitts off my desktop" (was: Re:Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2)

2002-07-06 Thread Paul Iadonisi
On Sat, 2002-07-06 at 19:19, Ben Boulanger wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Btw, while I'm inefficiently doing the job using tools I'm not overly familiar > > with 'because you said so', I'll also be looking elsewhere for employment with > > a company who values efficiency

Re: Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2

2002-07-06 Thread Bayard R. Coolidge
Well, having come from a wierd environment where UNIX (and a certain other well-known nearly quarter-century old proprietary operating system) were barely tolerated by the Corporate Management that was 1500+ miles away and who thought Windows was the Cat's Meow, I can sympathize with both sides of

Re: Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2

2002-07-06 Thread Ben Boulanger
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Btw, while I'm inefficiently doing the job using tools I'm not overly familiar > with 'because you said so', I'll also be looking elsewhere for employment with > a company who values efficiency of dictatorial and mindless rules without a decent > unde

Re: Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2

2002-07-06 Thread John Abreau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > So, why is it people are "forced" to use Windows? I really think > it's gotten to the point that you can use Linux if you want to with > out too much trouble. Barring the requirement of a very specialized > application that must be run under Windows, anyone who sa

Re: Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2

2002-07-06 Thread John Abreau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I was "forced to use Windows" for about 1 day at my current job. I > thought about the cygwin route and got so far as getting it > installed and running X. But then I began to realize I missing > things I needed, like perl, so I'd install perl. Then something els

Re: Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2

2002-07-06 Thread plussier
In a message dated: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 17:36:27 EDT Tom Rauschenbach said: >Sometimes some of that "talk" is company policy. Often when people say that >they are 'forced" to use Windows, they don't mean that that need Windows for >some reason or other, they mean that they are forced to use Wind

Re: Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2

2002-07-06 Thread Tom Rauschenbach
On Saturday 06 July 2002 h:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:05:32 EDT > > > So, why is it people are "forced" to use Windows? I really think > it's gotten to the point that you can use Linux if you want to with > out too much trouble. Barring the requiremen

Re: Open SSH for Red Hat 6.2

2002-07-06 Thread plussier
In a message dated: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:05:32 EDT John Abreau said: >When I'm forced to use Windows, I like to install cygwin, which includes >OpenSSH and has an XFree86 add-on. In the past, before I tried cygwin, >I would have recommended SecureCRT for Windows users; now I'd be >tempted to offe

RE: decent dial-up providers in Andover, MA?

2002-07-06 Thread numberwhun
Suzanne, When my wife and I were living in Plaistow, NH, we had to go with dial-up for a while. There is a company called 'BiznessOnline'. They had a connection in Haverhill, Ma. I connected right at the high end of 56K every time. They are $17.95 unmetered. They don't require a credit card