[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Personally, I think a lot of this is moot. Using cleartext FTP for
> authenticated access over the public 'net is a really unnecessary risk these
> days.
Tod said in his original post:
: Without the requirement for windows clients I'd just use scp and
: rsync. Oh
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Tod Hagan wrote:
> Is there a daemon I can run besides ftp which has clients which run on
> Windows and Macs to allow password protected access for uploading? This
> isn't for anonymous uploads.
For authenticated file transfers on public networks, I recommend against
plain
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
>>> In fact, some implementations are quite secure, and are always
>>> improving.
>>
>> Name one.
>
> If you can't find one, you shouldn't be running a publicly accessible
> ftp server.
Well, can you name one? :-)
Just about every popular, Open
Tod Hagan wrote:
>
> Is there a daemon I can run besides ftp which has clients which run on
> Windows and Macs to allow password protected access for uploading?
> This isn't for anonymous uploads.
SSH.
> Without the requirement for windows clients I'd just use scp and
> rsync. Oh, for Windows a
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Is there a daemon I can run besides ftp which has clients which run on
> > Windows and Macs to allow password protected access for uploading?
> > This isn't for anonymous uploads.
> ...
> > I hate ftp. The design of
>Is there a daemon I can run besides ftp which has clients which run on
>Windows and Macs to allow password protected access for uploading?
Why not samba for Win, and netatalk for Macs?
I have a server here in the office that has a globally shared
diretory: Samba, AppleShare, NFS, FTP, HTTP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 05:25:04PM -0500, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
> >> In fact, some implementations are quite secure, and are always
> >> improving.
>
> Name one.
If you can't find one, you shouldn't be running a publicly accessible
ftp server. And if you aren't p
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 05:25:04PM -0500, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
> In fact, some implementations are quite secure, and are always
> improving.
Name one.
--
Tod Hagan
Campton, NH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there a daemon I can run besides ftp which has clients which run on
> Windows and Macs to allow password protected access for uploading?
> This isn't for anonymous uploads.
...
> I hate ftp. The design of the protocol itself is OLD, from the early
> 70s -- that's o
Is there a daemon I can run besides ftp which has clients which run on
Windows and Macs to allow password protected access for uploading?
This isn't for anonymous uploads.
Without the requirement for windows clients I'd just use scp and
rsync. Oh, for Windows and Mac rsync clients.
Without the r
10 matches
Mail list logo