Peter Cavender said:
> >One other nit (for me) with djbdns - I went to the web site, looked all
> >through it, downloaded both the tarball and the documentation tarball,
> >untarred & went through every piece I could. For the life of me, I can't find
> >a license. This, of course, explains why i
>One other nit (for me) with djbdns - I went to the web site, looked all
>through it, downloaded both the tarball and the documentation tarball,
>untarred & went through every piece I could. For the life of me, I can't find
>a license. This, of course, explains why it's not in Debian (no
>redist
From: "Paul Lussier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: djbdns (was: Heads up for named?)
> In a message dated: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:16:39 EST
> "Thomas Charron" said:
> >*AHEM* Then perhaps you should start scratching your itch, so to
say.
> >:-)
&g
One other nit (for me) with djbdns - I went to the web site, looked all
through it, downloaded both the tarball and the documentation tarball,
untarred & went through every piece I could. For the life of me, I can't find
a license. This, of course, explains why it's not in Debian (no
redistr
In a message dated: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:16:39 EST
"Thomas Charron" said:
>*AHEM* Then perhaps you should start scratching your itch, so to say.
>:-)
Well, technically he doesn't have one, since he's using BIND :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing not
From: "Benjamin Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greater NH Linux Users' Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 9:28 PM
Subject: djbdns (was: Heads up for named?)
> > It *does* support TCP, if you really think you need it:
> Th
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Peter Cavender wrote:
> It seems you didn't really look at djbdns too carefully, but just gave it
> a quick and cursory bashing, based on misunderstandings of both the
> software and the RFCs.
I'm really not interested in getting into a flamewar about this. Suffice it
to s
