In a message dated: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 13:54:21 EST
Jefferson Kirkland said:
Ok, I am looking to install Gnome after finally getting Xwindows
installed. I did the following:
apt-get update
apt-cache search 'gnome' list
Try:
$ apt-cache pkgnames task | grep gnome
and $ apt-cache
In a message dated: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 12:06:35 EST
David Andrew - Sun MDE said:
If everyone top-posted, the thread would be intact, and it would save a
lot of wasted time searching through the message to get the part added
with the new e-mail.
It would also make every e-mail incredibly huge,
Paul,
I am not advocating keeping entire message history, unless absolutlely
needed for context. And I specifically addressed interleaving, with an
added 1-liner as an intro. I can't see how that would add more than a
few bytes to notes.
On the other hand, your message from gnhlug-discuss
In a message dated: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:45:00 EST
David Andrew - Sun MDE said:
Paul,
I am not advocating keeping entire message history, unless absolutlely
needed for context.
Okay, then I mis-understood the point you were trying to make.
And I specifically addressed interleaving, with an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless, AFAIK, all lists managed by MailMan add the following
lines to the header:
X-BeenThere:
X-Mailman-Version:
List-Help:
List-Post:
List-Subscribe:
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
I really like mailing lists that use MailMan and I think
In a message dated: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:58:19 EST
Erik Price said:
If you've ever
been a list manager and inundated with requests from subscribers to
'please unsubscribe me from this list', then you'd quickly come to
appreciate these footers.
It's funny b/c I see these happen all the
In a message dated: 23 Feb 2003 15:08:39 EST
Kenneth E. Lussier said:
the easiest way of doing this would be to use Ximian-Gnome.
Have they fixed this? The last time I tried using Ximian-Gnome on
Debian, if completely fscked up my system. I had to manually remove
all the ximian packages and
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 12:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's funny b/c I see these happen all the time on lists that /do/ offer
the footer.
I do too :) And, as has oft been stated before, and will no doubt be
stated again, technology is not the solution for what is a human
behavioral
My guess is that IBM is first on the hit list? Perhaps the deepest pockets.
Would this case (as they see it) also apply to SUN who supports Unix/Linux
as well. Anyone else on deck?
I see this as a half-hearted attempt to blackmail IBM to settle out of court,
and I think that SCO underestimates IBM
This is not a strategy any business leader would willingly follow and funding
a huge lawsuit against IBM could cost them tens of millions per year.
It could also be a situation like the OSF faced many years ago when Sun
was secretly funding some company (name escapes me) to sue the OSF
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:07:00AM -0500, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
My guess is that IBM is first on the hit list? Perhaps the deepest pockets.
Would this case (as they see it) also apply to SUN who supports Unix/Linux
as well. Anyone else on deck?
I see this as a half-hearted attempt to
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, at 10:07am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My guess is that IBM is first on the hit list? Perhaps the deepest
pockets. Would this case (as they see it) also apply to SUN who supports
Unix/Linux as well. Anyone else on deck?
HP... Red Hat... SuSE... Mandrake... Microsoft...
I have set up a virtual host on my server to access my mail. It is a
Redhat 7.3 box with the following:
squirrelmail 1.2.10
apache 1.3.2
mod_ssl 2.8.12
openssl 0.9.6b
php 4.3
Whenever I log into squirrelmail, the initial page takes forever to load,
up to a minute or more. Once this page has
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 11:22, Derek Doucette wrote:
Whenever I log into squirrelmail, the initial page takes forever to load,
up to a minute or more.
[snip]
Sounds to me like there's a chance that your apache server is trying to
do a reverse lookup on the ip your web browser is coming from.
Cole Tuininga said:
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 11:22, Derek Doucette wrote:
Whenever I log into squirrelmail, the initial page takes forever to
load, up to a minute or more.
[snip]
Sounds to me like there's a chance that your apache server is trying to
do a reverse ... This is just a guess
More collateral damage from the SCO legal action against IBM. I
happen to be a SuSE customer, so I was rather interested in this:
http://linux.box.sk/newsread.php?newsid=817
This article was referenced by Slashdot:
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/10/212241.shtml?tid=143tid=106
Bayard
I don't know how many people read slashdot, but this is a story that hits
close to home. Good news for Linux!!!
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/10/2156202mode=threadtid=106
Regards,
Jeff Kirkland
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 12:55, David Long wrote:
It could also be a situation like the OSF faced many years ago when Sun
was secretly funding some company (name escapes me) to sue the OSF
(can't remember the complaint either). When the lawyers demanded that
the secret source of funding be
18 matches
Mail list logo
