Quoting Jeff Kinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:09:38PM -0500, Ben Boulanger wrote:
> > Ya know, I said my part. I put my .02 in... but I just can't sit here
> and
> > listen to this anymore. Here's what it comes down to: You ARE in IP
> > Space of known open relays. You AR
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:09:38PM -0500, Ben Boulanger wrote:
> Ya know, I said my part. I put my .02 in... but I just can't sit here and
> listen to this anymore. Here's what it comes down to: You ARE in IP
> Space of known open relays. You ARE in known residential space. You ARE
> paying
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Derek Martin wrote:
> This doesn't at all address my point, which is that if
> AT&T/Comcast/whoever they are today doesn't see fit to take action
> against me for violating my TOS, what business is it of AOL?
> Furthermore and more importantly, as Rob points out, outgoing SMTP
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 04:52 PM, Bill Sconce wrote:
Philosophical: elmininating the possibility that the vendor of my
favorite package may go out of business, leaving me stranded; or
reposition a product, leaving me stranded; or someday require an
expensive upgrade in order that I may c
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 16:52, Bill Sconce wrote:
> Honest to goodness neat: Python, beyond question. Python has
> (I believe) changed the professional life of almost everyone who
> has learned how to use it.
So Bill,
How about a talk about Python for an upcoming meeting?
r
> -Bill
> wh
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:31:43 +
Jon Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The object of thistalk is to not only talk about the philosophical
> things that excites me, but honest to goodness "neat" programs.
Philosophical: elmininating the possibility that the vendor of my
favorite package may go
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Derek Martin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:26:11PM -0500, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> > > Last time I checked, Comcast's "business" rate is more than twice their
> > > residential rate yet still suffers from the same "
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 13:22, Rob Lembree wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 12:26, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 12:38, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > > Quoting Ben Boulanger's email of Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:23:55 -0500 (EST
> > > > If AOL says 'no
> > > > direct mail from this IP Space' b
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 12:26, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 12:38, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > Quoting Ben Boulanger's email of Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:23:55 -0500 (EST):
> >
> > > If AOL says 'no
> > > direct mail from this IP Space' because there's a known issue with it, I
> > > think
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:26:11PM -0500, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
>
> While I agree with this whole-heartedly, the only way to change it is
> with money. Take your business elsewhere, ad when Comcast, or whom ever
> wants to know why, tell them exactly why. I dumped MediaOne (might have
> been A
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 12:38, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> Quoting Ben Boulanger's email of Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:23:55 -0500 (EST):
>
> > If AOL says 'no
> > direct mail from this IP Space' because there's a known issue with it, I
> > think they're doing the right thing. To ignore the problem only makes i
11 matches
Mail list logo
