> On 12/14/05, Travis Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Turns out there's ProBIND2, and it's SWEET.
>
> You might mention *why*... :-)
A couple of reasons Travis didn't mention include:
The configuration files generated by ProBIND are always checked before
they're pushed. That said, if any err
When: December 21, 2005 7:00PM (6:30 for Q&A)
Topic: Beowulf: The Latest Scoop
Moderator: Kurt Keville,
Systems Administrator, MIT Clinical Research Center
Location: MIT Building E51 Room 315
Kurt talks about his Beowulf work and about the SuperComputing
conference. Kurt has been involved
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/14/05, Travis Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Turns out there's ProBIND2, and it's SWEET.
>
> You might mention *why*... :-)
>
> (Yes, I know I could Google for it myself, and research it, and all
> that. But: Travis has already done (at least
On Dec 14, 2005, at 8:21 PM, Travis Roy wrote:
Well, for us (us being Colospace) it works well. We have a large
number of domains, and right now we do it by hand, we edit
named.conf, zone files, master and slaves, all by hand. This
centralized config will save us a TON of time.
Not to pic
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/14/05, Travis Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Turns out there's ProBIND2, and it's SWEET.
>
> You might mention *why*... :-)
And you might also include a URL. As Ben mentioned, sure, we could
google for it, or look on freshmeat, but if you can, w
> On Dec 14, 2005, at 8:21 PM, Travis Roy wrote:
> Not to pick on you in particular, Travis, as much to make a general
> point: you say you have a "large" number of domains, and I'd be
> curious as to the order of magnitude, just to get the big picture.
For what it's worth, this is great even if y
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:40:54AM -0500, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> Who: Ben the-one-and-only Scott
> What: DNS/BIND, and whatever else enters Ben's mind.
> Where: Martha's Exchange
> When: Thursday (that's *this* Thursday),
>December 15; 6:00 for grub, 7:30 for meeting
> How: Direction
I just wanted to post for sure that I'll be at the meeting tonight. I
don't remember who keeps track of that, so I'm just posting it to the
list...
-N
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/
Not to pick on you in particular, Travis, as much to make a general
point: you say you have a "large" number of domains, and I'd be curious
as to the order of magnitude, just to get the big picture.
just under 900 zone files, including reverse zones.
Managing by hand is a PITA
On Dec 15, 2005, at 09:00, Neil Schelly wrote:
It doesn't matter what you consider large. Including reverse
lookup zones, when I implemented this, I think I managed 2 views with
about 10 zones in one and about 20 in the other.
Does it grok views? That is, when adding/changing/deleting an a
> On Dec 15, 2005, at 09:00, Neil Schelly wrote:
>
>> It doesn't matter what you consider large. Including reverse
>> lookup zones, when I implemented this, I think I managed 2 views with
>> about 10 zones in one and about 20 in the other.
>
> Does it grok views? That is, when adding/changing/de
Hi,
Planning on attending this evening if all goes well...
Mike
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gn
Hi All,
This is a rather odd question, and I'm not even sure that it is possible, but
I'll give it a try. I need to figure out a way to maintain a session through a
NAT box when the client changes the IP address. So, the situation looks like
this:
Clients--> iptables/NAT
Hi All,
This is a simple one I am replacing a Windows AD Domain controller with a
Samba PDC and LDAP. I have Samba and LDAP set up using a different windows
domain name so that I can test things out. However, I want to pre-poulate the
Samba PDC with machine accounts, users, etc. while the W
Without wasting too much effort, can't you just put a few objects in your
new directory and then try to change it's domain to yet a third unused
domain and see what happens? It sounds doable, but I wouldn't try doing
something like that without a dry run first.
-N
> Hi All,
>
> This is a simple
On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The clients IP address can change from, say, 192.168.0.3 to 192.168.0.54 (or
> any other
> address, I'm just making these up), but the session to the server needs to be
> maintained.
I don't think that is possible with "off the shelf"
Now why didn't I think of that?? (oh, right, because I work for a startup
moving a million miles a minute without time to think of the obvious :-)
Thanks,
Kenny
-- Original message --
From: "Neil Schelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Without wasting too much effort, can
-- Original message --
From: Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 12/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The clients IP address can change from, say, 192.168.0.3 to 192.168.0.54
> > (or
> any other
> > address, I'm just making these up), but the
Well. I have to say, Ben's discussion of DNS was truly enlightening. I
learned a lot about DNS -- there were things I hadn't known that I now do,
and things I thought I knew, that I now know I didn't.
In other words, it was a good discussion.
For those who weren't in attendance, though, it's di
19 matches
Mail list logo
