A light turnout (three of us!), but a highly productive evening.
As promised we cross-reviewed the magazines the attendees use
the most. There was no formal poll, but from memory:
o Linux Format (expensive, but more than one of us has
installed a product for the first evaluation from the
I'm finally fed up with adelphia email service. They have enough space but
limit the inbox to 1000 messages even though there is still 90% free space
available.
Does anyone have an available gmail invitations or would recommend yahoo or
hotmail email?
thanks,
-pete
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sending a gmail invite your way. gmail is great, it's my favorite of
every one i've tried
-chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm finally fed up with adelphia email service. They have enough space but
limit the inbox to 1000 messages even though there is still 90% free space
available.
Does
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 07:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm finally fed up with adelphia email service. They have enough
> space but limit the inbox to 1000 messages even though there is
> still 90% free space available.
>
> Does anyone have an available gmail invitations or would recomme
Thanks to all the gmail invites...
-pete
Cole Tuininga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 07:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm finally fed up with adelphia email service. They have enough
> > space but limit the inbox to 1000 messages even though there is
> > sti
That said, considering that gmail keeps archives of all messages, I'd
put some thought into how comfortable you are with having somebody else
keep a copy of your email. Personally, I only ever use my gmail account
for public mailing lists I'm on.
And who's to say that any email on any server is
but google's motto is "don't be evil". they wouldn't read my e-mail, right?
haha i do wonder if one day I'll do a google search and see one of my
e-mails show up.
-chris
Cole Tuininga wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 07:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm finally fed up with adelphia ema
On 7/6/06, Travis Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And who's to say that any email on any server isn't archived for who
knows how long...
Indeed. It's a fair bet it is. Google isn't the only operator that
performs backups of their systems. And besides, the NSA keeps a copy
of everything for y
***
Dartmouth-Lake Sunapee Linux Users Group
http://www.dlslug.org/
***
The next regular monthly meeting of the DLSLUG will be held:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 13:43, Ben Scott wrote:
Indeed. It's a fair bet it is. Google isn't the only operator that
performs backups of their systems. And besides, the NSA keeps a copy
of everything for you, too. ;-)
So next time I lose a mail disk I should file a FOIA request with the
NSA? :)
On Jun 30, 2006, at 18:52, Ben Scott wrote:
Well, since you bring it up, Firefox's "Extensions" are very similar
to ActiveX in this regard. Both will auto-download programs to your
computer.
One difference worth noting is there aren't websites (statistically, at
least) that require a Firefo
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:33:08PM -0400, Tom Faska wrote:
> If you have not seen it yet go to http://www.qmail.org/ for information
> on QMail. Another very useful site is http://www.lifewithqmail.org/.
>
> I switched from QMail to Postfix several years ago but may still
> remember enough to h
On 7/6/06, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, since you bring it up, Firefox's "Extensions" are very similar
to ActiveX in this regard. Both will auto-download programs to your
computer.
One difference worth noting is there aren't websites (statistically, at
least) that require a
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:42:09PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2006, at 13:43, Ben Scott wrote:
>
> > Indeed. It's a fair bet it is. Google isn't the only operator that
> >performs backups of their systems. And besides, the NSA keeps a copy
> >of everything for you, too. ;-)
>
>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:42:09PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2006, at 13:43, Ben Scott wrote:
> > Indeed. It's a fair bet it is. Google isn't the only operator that
> > performs backups of their systems. And besides, the NSA keeps a copy
> > of everything for you, too. ;-)
>
>
On 7/6/06, Jeff Kinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So next time I lose a mail disk I should file a FOIA request with the
NSA? :)
Hmm, We know you're joking, but...
Yah, why bother with all these expensive tapes and hard disks and
such, when you can just let the NSA handle your backups for y
--- Begin Message ---
When the US brought antitrust suit against IBM, IBM had more antitrust
lawyers than the justice department had lawyers of any kind. :-|
(This is a real, genuine fact!) :-|
I have a strict rule. I let IBM's lawyers worry about their domain, and
I worry about everything el
I've looked everywhere. What happened to gasp, the gnu assembler macro
processor? Did they stop making it? It used to be in its own rpm and then
the latest thing I found on the web is that it used to be part of
binutils. Gone. Anyone know where my gasp went?
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit
Gasp is considered 'obsolete'. The bintuils-gasp is the only remnant of it, for applications that require it.On 7/6/06, Steven W. Orr <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I've looked everywhere. What happened to gasp, the gnu assembler macro
processor? Did they stop making it? It used to be in its own rpm
Gasp is considered 'obsolete'. The bintuils-gasp is the only remnant of
it, for applications that require it.
Ok, I'll ask the obvoius follow-up question -- obsoleted by what?
What do use instead if we want to code Assembler with a F/LOSS tool-chain?
--
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thursday, Jul 6th 2006 at 22:22 -0400, quoth Thomas Charron:
=> Gasp is considered 'obsolete'. The bintuils-gasp is the only remnant of
=>it, for applications that require it.
It just doesn't make any sense. I know that with the advent of pipelining,
writing assembler is less and less sensib
21 matches
Mail list logo
