On 5/22/07, Dan Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ben Scott wrote:
> Alternative #1:
>
> Stop watching TV. Radical idea, I know, not buying a product you
don't like. :)
>
It's been well over a decade since I've watched television. Do get a lot
more reading done. Does cut down on "water co
Gone. Got an email from someone interested in it.
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
"Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about a more EO (equal offense) quote: "Opinions are like
> assholes: Everybody has one, and they almost always stink!"
Not that I have, or care to perform a proper and scientifically
controlled 'snif test', but do you have any even anecdotal eviden
>
> Not that I have, or care to perform a proper and scientifically
> controlled 'snif test', but do you have any even anecdotal evidence
> that there are any sphincters which do NOT have an undesirable odor
> thereby supporting the 'always' portion of your above statement ?
Go to PubMed (http://w
"Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But how can they allow you do watch it whenever you want, and
>> disallow someone to distribute it for free without paying ANYTHING for
>> it?
>
> I don't necessarily have the answers to their quandaries. I just
> know that I'm not going to pay to no
Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Make sure you check availability, not just a hit for a show.
> Mythbusters, Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood, and Ask This Old House have a
> very poor showing on Netflix, though there are some hits. This Old
> House, New Yankee Workshop, and Good Eats
>
> Why not make the show downloadable for free but sell advertising and
> put the commercials in the show. Sure, they can be ellided, but
> seriously, who's going to bother?
Yah, because writing a program to run the content through and auto-
delete the commercials is so much harder than crackin
On 5/23/07, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How about a more EO (equal offense) quote: "Opinions are like
> > assholes: Everybody has one, and they almost always stink!"
> Not that I have, or care to perform a proper and scientifically
> contr
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 18:49, Dan Jenkins wrote:
> It's been well over a decade since I've watched television. Do get a
> lot more reading done.
I quit is 1987. I don't know how I would find time to fit it back
into my schedule now. It is such a waste of time.
> Does cut down on "water c
On 5/23/07, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Make sure you check availability, not just a hit for a show.
> > Mythbusters, Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood, and Ask This Old House have a
> > very poor showing on Netflix, though there are some hits. T
On 5/23/07, Jim Kuzdrall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I quit is 1987. I don't know how I would find time to fit it back
> into my schedule now. It is such a waste of time.
Statement of fact, instead of opinion apperently. :-P
>Try this some time. Record the sound of your favorite "ed
>
> OMG, Ben!
>
> http://smartflix.com/store/video/300/How-To-Construct-Mines
>
> How to blow yourself up in one simply instructional video! :-)
Is having a link showing you how to get something that describes how
to make a mine better or worse than sending a URL on where to get
torren
On 5/23/07, Travis Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OMG, Ben!
> > http://smartflix.com/store/video/300/How-To-Construct-Mines
> > How to blow yourself up in one simply instructional video! :-)
> Is having a link showing you how to get something that describes how
> to make a mine better or
On 5/23/07, Jim Kuzdrall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not that I am against the populous having their thoughts and desires
centrally controlled. (As Marx would say, "The opiate of the people.")
With out this consumption-driving device, our consumer society would
collapse, devastating my stock
On 5/23/07, Travis Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is having a link showing you how to get something that describes how
> to make a mine better or worse than sending a URL on where to get
> torrent files?
Accidentally blowing oneself up is not considered illegal, and, in
your case Travis, could
On Tuesday, May 22nd 2007 at 14:53 -0400, quoth Thomas Charron:
=>On 5/22/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
=>> On 5/22/07, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
=>> > You where dumb enough to WATCH it? :-) I thought you said
=>> > you vote with your wallet...
=>> I used to
Could we have some on-topic discussions on the list, please?
General tech is fine, too. The state of NH as a place for Linux to
flourish. Enough scatalogical and explosives for a while, please.
--
Ted "Not the Mail Nazi, just play one on the list" Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.te
Is that like "Freedom Fries?"
Anyone tried this?
https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinf
Has anyone got a clue what Red Hat is promoting with the "Global Desktop?"
Just when I thought we were going to see Fedora Core/Extras united, a
clear unified enterprise message out of Red Hat, they zig again.
"Today Red Hat is announcing the upcoming availability of Red Hat Global
Desktop. Globa
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 11:00, Thomas Charron wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Jim Kuzdrall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I quit is 1987. I don't know how I would find time to fit it
> > back into my schedule now. It is such a waste of time.
>
> Statement of fact, instead of opinion apperently. :-P
I asked my buddy that works for RedHat. Cheaper licensing, 2 year life
cycle desktop os.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:43 AM
To: Greater NH Linux User Group
Subject: Hey, How 'bout them Red-Hat
oh yeah, and he pointed me towards
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS8809240318.html
-Original Message-
From: Flaherty, Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:15 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Greater NH Linux User Group
Subject: RE: Hey, How 'bout them Red-Hatters!
I asked my buddy th
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:35 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
> Is that like "Freedom Fries?"
>
> Anyone tried this?
>
> https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
They are pretty nice. I've installed them on my Ubuntu/Feisty laptop by
just unpacking them into ~/.fonts and running fc-cache. Rebooting would
ha
On 5/23/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone got a clue what Red Hat is promoting with the "Global Desktop?"
>
> Just when I thought we were going to see Fedora Core/Extras united, a
> clear unified enterprise message out of Red Hat, they zig again.
>
No ziggin'. Core/Extras mer
After looking at the up and coming 1.8 firmware for the PS3, they
will now allow users to stream media via 'DNLA' enabled devices.
Any idea exactly what this means directly? Is there a way for say,
a MythTV box to be 'DNLA enabled'? Data on the net points to it being
some sort of UPnP device
Paul Lussier writes:
> http://www.smartflix.com
For a while now I have been interested in re-watching a show that used
to be on PBS when I was...younger. It was called "The Mechanical
Universe". It was a physics show that used a lot of computer graphics
to illustrate the mathematical principle
> For a while now I have been interested in re-watching a show
> that used to be on PBS when I was...younger. It was called "The
> Mechanical Universe". It was a physics show that used a lot
> of computer graphics to illustrate the mathematical principles
> behind physics.
Hey! I love The Mec
On 5/23/07, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea exactly what this means directly? Is there a way for say,
> a MythTV box to be 'DNLA enabled'? Data on the net points to it being
> some sort of UPnP device which supports HTTP streaming of content.
> DNLA and Linux searches lead
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:07:34 G.O. wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone got a clue what Red Hat is promoting with the "Global
> > Desktop?"
> >
> > Just when I thought we were going to see Fedora Core/Extras united, a
> > clear unified enterprise message out
On 5/23/07, Flaherty, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked my buddy that works for RedHat. Cheaper licensing, 2 year life
> cycle desktop os.
Sounds like another Linux distribution I once used... I think it was
called "Red Hat Linux" or something like that... ;-)
-- Ben
On May 23, 2007, Ben Scott sent me the following:
> I searched for "DLNA", and Google suggested I might mean "DLNA"
> (Digital Living Network Alliance) instead. A quick Google for "PS3
> DLNA" seemed to indicate Google was right.
>
> Note that I have no idea what any of this is; just reportin
On 5/23/07, Chip Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 23, 2007, Ben Scott sent me the following:
> > I searched for "DLNA", and Google suggested I might mean "DLNA"
> > (Digital Living Network Alliance) instead. A quick Google for "PS3
> > DLNA" seemed to indicate Google was right.
> >
On 5/23/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any idea exactly what this means directly? Is there a way for say,
> > a MythTV box to be 'DNLA enabled'? Data on the net points to it being
> > some sort of UPnP device which supports H
Michael ODonnell writes:
> Hey! I love The Mechanical Universe, with the prof standing
> at the front of the class and mixing his dry (nerdy?) wit into
> the material as he lectures, and all those early animations by
> James Blinn - now *that's* entertainment. I think it's here:
>
> http://w
On 5/23/07, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Chip Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On May 23, 2007, Ben Scott sent me the following:
> > > I searched for "DLNA", and Google suggested I might mean "DLNA"
> > > (Digital Living Network Alliance) instead. A quick Google
On 5/23/07, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MythTV is listed! I wonder if this means in some strange way, PS3's
> will now be able to out of the box use MythTV boxes??
I forgot to add, I also found:
http://www.dlna.org/en/industry/about/dlna_white_paper_2006.pdf
Perhaps uPnP AV is
On 5/23/07, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MythTV is listed! I wonder if this means in some strange way, PS3's
> > will now be able to out of the box use MythTV boxes??
> I forgot to add, I also found:
> http://www.dlna.org/en
Ten attendees made it to the May meeting of the Monadnock Valley Linux
User Group, held as usual on the second Thursday of the month at the
School Administrative Unit #1 offices, Hancock Road, Peterborough.
Bill Freeman presented his thoughts on the Man Page of the Month: dd.
Bill provided two pag
On 23 May 2007 16:57:32 -0400, Kevin D. Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.learner.org/resources/series42.html
>
> Hmm...the last time I tried that site, my computer didn't really deal
> with those videos very well, but now it seems to be almost at the
> point of playing them.
FWIW
39 matches
Mail list logo